journal article·2022-01Open access

The effects of drilling parameters on thrust force, temperature and hole quality of glass fiber reinforced polymer composites

Khurshid Malik, Faiz Ahmad, Woo Tze Keong, Ebru Gunister

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation of the drilling performance of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite based on the thrust force, temperature, and delamination factor (at entry and exit of the hole). High-speed steel (HSS), solid carbide (SC), and solid carbide Balinit® Helica coated (SCBH) twist tools were used for the drilling process. Other drilling parameters were high spindle speeds (12,000, 15,000, and 18,000 rpm), feed rate (300, 500, and 700 mm/min), and laminate thickness (3, 5, and 7 mm). ANOVA and response surface methodology were developed to examine the drilling process based on input and output parameters. Results showed that delamination was observed in the form of matrix debonding, uncut fibers, and fiber pull-out. The best drilling performance was achieved by the SC and SCBH tool at a low feed rate (300 rpm) and high speed (18,000 rpm), and high laminate thickness (7 mm).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Perak, Malaysia

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Ungku Omar, Perak, Malaysia

Department of Basic Sciences, Istanbul Galata University, Istanbul, Turkey

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10426914.2011.57786510.1080/10426914.2011.577865 ↗
2. 10.1063/5.007259810.1063/5.0072598 ↗
3. 10.1177/002199831038154010.1177/0021998310381540 ↗
4. 10.1177/073168440708757010.1177/0731684407087570 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma706425810.3390/ma7064258 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.007 ↗
7. 10.1007/s12034-009-0013-010.1007/s12034-009-0013-0 ↗
8. 10.1177/073168441244465310.1177/0731684412444653 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11666510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116665 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.011 ↗
11. 10.1177/073168441038627110.1177/0731684410386271 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.05010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.050 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00170-009-2440-x10.1007/s00170-009-2440-x ↗
14. 10.1080/10910344.2011.57980210.1080/10910344.2011.579802 ↗
15. 10.1155/2018/862989410.1155/2018/8629894 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831772810910.1177/0021998317728109 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10697310.1016/j.measurement.2019.106973 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.07910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.079 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.04310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.043 ↗
20. 10.12989/sem.2020.73.6.63110.12989/sem.2020.73.6.631 ↗
21. 10.1080/23311916.2019.170698110.1080/23311916.2019.1706981 ↗
22. Jayabal S · Indian J Eng Mater Sci (Ijems) · 2010 · 17 · 463
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.594-595.66110.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.594-595.661 ↗
24. 10.1080/10426914.2020.176525210.1080/10426914.2020.1765252 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199832094714310.1177/0021998320947143 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00170-017-1369-810.1007/s00170-017-1369-8 ↗
27. Kar KK · 2016
28. 10.1007/978-0-387-68619-610.1007/978-0-387-68619-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.02910.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.029 ↗
30. 10.1177/002199830934530910.1177/0021998309345309 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.10010.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.100 ↗
32. 10.1177/002199831247221810.1177/0021998312472218 ↗
33. 10.1177/002199831038154010.1177/0021998310381540 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.06810.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.068 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.02310.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.023 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.18510.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.185 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.12710.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.127 ↗
38. 10.1177/002199831245160910.1177/0021998312451609 ↗
39. 10.1080/15440478.2020.187062410.1080/15440478.2020.1870624 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10555210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105552 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.006 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.01510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.015 ↗
43. Kishore R · J Adv Prod Eng Manangement · 2009 · 4 · 37
44. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.05.00410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.05.004 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.12610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.126 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.02010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.020 ↗
47. Murthy B · J Res J Recent Sci · 2012 · 2277 · 2502
48. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.27810.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.278 ↗
49. 10.1109/ICMET.2010.559849710.1109/ICMET.2010.5598497 ↗
50. Liu D, Chen W, Chen Z. Study of thrust force and torque in drilling carbon fibre reinforced plastics(CFRP) using twist drill brazed diamond. In: 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics CAR 2010, 6–7 March 2010, pp. 44–47.10.1109/CAR.2010.5456801 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.01610.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.016 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.00110.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001 ↗
53. 10.1177/002199830809045610.1177/0021998308090456 ↗
54. Pantawane P · Int Journal Applied Engineering Research · 2011 · 2 · 448
55. Balzers OO. BALINIT® HELICA: Gives Your Drills that Extra Twis, https://www.oerlikon.com/ecomaXL/files/oerlikon_HQ002EN (accessed 14 01 2022).
56. 10.1080/10426914.2020.176525210.1080/10426914.2020.1765252 ↗
57. 10.1201/b1955910.1201/b19559 ↗
58. 10.1002/adem.20040002510.1002/adem.200400025 ↗
59. 10.1007/s12034-011-0359-y10.1007/s12034-011-0359-y ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2005.11.00510.1016/j.ijrmhm.2005.11.005 ↗