journal article·2021-07

Effects of defects and functional groups on graphene and nanotube thermoset epoxy-based nanocomposites mechanical properties using molecular dynamics simulation

Mahmoud Haghighi, Ali Khodadadi, Hossein Golestanian, Farshid Aghadavoudi

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 29· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

In this article, several thermoset epoxy-based nanocomposites are simulated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Epoxy resin with 75% crosslinking ratio is modeled first and its properties are used as the matrix material mechanical properties. The effects of defects and functional groups on carbon nanotube- and nanographene-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites are investigated. To achieve our goals, various types of defects and functional groups are created on graphene and nanotube in the MD models. The defects consist of Stone–Wales, vacancy, and Adatom. In addition, functional groups consist of O, OH, COOH, and NH 2 . Mechanical properties of nanocomposites are determined and compared. Moreover, nanocomposites consisting of continuous and short reinforcements are modeled to investigate the effects of reinforcement length on nanocomposite mechanical properties. Numerical results show that defects and functional groups reduce the elastic modulus of the nanofillers and nanocomposites in continuous nanofiller-reinforced epoxy. However, in nanocomposites consisting of short nanofillers, defects and functional groups have mixed effects on nanocomposite mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr Branch, Isfahan, Iran

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/095440621878191010.1177/0954406218781910 ↗
2. 10.1177/095440621987876010.1177/0954406219878760 ↗
3. 10.1177/095440621770609610.1177/0954406217706096 ↗
4. 10.1177/0967391111019004-51910.1177/0967391111019004-519 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.07810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.078 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2318210.1002/pc.23182 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.00110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.02110.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.021 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.12210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.122 ↗
11. Aghadavoudi F · Int J Adv Design Manuf Technol · 2016 · 9 · 137
12. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.05010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.050 ↗
13. 10.1177/073168441667774510.1177/0731684416677745 ↗
14. 10.1177/002199831662897310.1177/0021998316628973 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1872-5805(14)60131-110.1016/S1872-5805(14)60131-1 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.005 ↗
18. 10.1177/089270571668491810.1177/0892705716684918 ↗
19. 10.1177/184798041882103710.1177/1847980418821037 ↗
20. 10.1177/09673911160240020810.1177/096739111602400208 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2455710.1002/pc.24557 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2401410.1002/pc.24014 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.00410.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.004 ↗