Sisal fiber reinforced polyethylene terephthalate composites; Fabrication, characterization and possible application
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of thermoplastics (TPs) for natural fiber composites is restricted to commodity ones like polypropylene and polyethylene However, using engineered TPs such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) will benefit from its technical and economic advantages. The research aims to characterize injection molded PET composites reinforced with sisal fibers treated differently. Polyethylene terephthalate composites containing 40 wt.% of untreated, alkaline-treated, and alkali/acetylation treated sisal fibers were prepared using compounding and injection molding processes and then characterized. It has been found that production of sisal-PET composites by compounding and injection molding has been shown to be possible. Thermal damage to sisal fiber was noticed during composite production. Based on the thermogravimetric analysis analysis, a net weight loss (excluding water loss) of 11.1%–14.0% was observed at the operating temperatures of the two processes. The addition of 40 wt.% of sisal to the PET matrix improved the tensile modulus by 137%. Further improvement by 179% was observed when alkali-treated sisal fiber was used. The combined alkali/acetylation treatment of sisal yields more enhancement by 233%. This is a significant advancement because modulus is the most influential parameter during the design and service of an engineering product. Generally, compared to the raw sisal composite (RSC) the interfacial, mechanical, thermal, and water absorption properties of the alkali treated sisal composite (Al-SC) and alkali/acetylated sisal composite (Al-ASC) specimens recorded an improvement. Relative to the natural fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites that were commercialized in the automotive industry, the produced sisal–PET composites resulted in a considerable improvement of 66.6%–190% in flexural strength and by 110.5%–410.0% in flexural modulus, depending on sisal fiber treatment and the composite to be compared. Thus, the studied composites can be recommended for various parts of automobiles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Tribology and Wear Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bahir Dar University
Clausthal University of Technology
Funding
The German Academic Exchange Service · DAAD · MoE of Ethiopia
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/073168440910446510.1177/0731684409104465 ↗
2. 10.1177/152808371665446810.1177/1528083716654468 ↗
3. Halip JA, Hua LS, Ashaari Z, et al. Effect of treatment on water absorption behavior of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Mechanical and physical testing of biocomposites, fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites. Elsevier Ltd, 2018, pp. 141–156.
4. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
5. 10.1177/152808371983285110.1177/1528083719832851 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-810.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-8 ↗
7. 10.1021/bk-2014-1175.ch00910.1021/bk-2014-1175.ch009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
9. 10.1177/152808371880136610.1177/1528083718801366 ↗
10. 10.1515/9783110574432-00810.1515/9783110574432-008 ↗
11. 10.1201/9781315152967-110.1201/9781315152967-1 ↗
12. 10.1177/073168440707553610.1177/0731684407075536 ↗
13. 10.1177/09673911160240071510.1177/096739111602400715 ↗
14. Adhikari M. Natural fibre composites for injection moulding, 2012, pp. 1–96.
15. Aimé Sylvain FT. Elaboration and Characterization of Pet-Hemp Fiber Composites for Thermoforming Applications. UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC, 2016.
16. 10.1002/978047066032410.1002/9780470660324 ↗
17. 10.1590/0104-1428.172210.1590/0104-1428.1722 ↗
18. 10.1002/mame.20130000810.1002/mame.201300008 ↗
19. 10.1177/073168441880202210.1177/0731684418802022 ↗
20. 10.1177/089270571983800010.1177/0892705719838000 ↗
21. 10.3390/jcs204006610.3390/jcs2040066 ↗
22. 10.1177/152808372094424010.1177/1528083720944240 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.1228510.1002/app.12285 ↗
24. Farsi M. Thermoplastic matrix reinforced with natural fibers: a study on interfacial behavior. Some Crit Issues Inject Molding, Intech, 2012.
25. 10.1177/096739111988004610.1177/0967391119880046 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10825410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108254 ↗
27. 10.1177/152808372092477410.1177/1528083720924774 ↗
28. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.5010.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.50 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00170-110.1016/S0266-3538(01)00170-1 ↗
30. Moigne NL Otazaghine B Corn S et al. Surfaces and interfaces in natural fibre reinforced composites fundamentals modifications and characterization. In: Navard P CEMEF CNRS/Mines ParisTech SA (eds) SPRINGER BRIEFS IN MOLECULAR SCIENCE; BIOBASED POLYMERS. Springer Nature; 2017 pp. 1–149.
31. 10.1007/BF0072150310.1007/BF00721503 ↗
32. 10.1177/073168441772558410.1177/0731684417725584 ↗
33. 10.1177/152808372094261410.1177/1528083720942614 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-3-642-17370-7_2210.1007/978-3-642-17370-7_22 ↗
35. 10.1177/152808371876992610.1177/1528083718769926 ↗
36. 10.3390/polym1202047510.3390/polym12020475 ↗
37. 10.1007/s12221-012-1300-810.1007/s12221-012-1300-8 ↗
38. Thyavihalli Girijappa YG, Mavinkere Rangappa S, Parameswaranpillai J, et al. Natural fibers as sustainable and renewable resource for development of eco-friendly composites: a comprehensive review. Front Mater 2019; 6(September): 1–14.10.3389/fmats.2019.00226 ↗
39. 10.1177/152808371880420710.1177/1528083718804207 ↗
40. 10.1177/152808371880420310.1177/1528083718804203 ↗
41. Antony S, Cherouat A, Montay G. Effect of fibre content on the mechanical properties of hemp fibre woven fabrics/polypropylene composite laminates. Polym Polym Compos 2021; 29(9): S790–S802.
42. Singh JIP, Singh S, Dhawan V, et al. Flax fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites for non-structural engineering applications: effect of molding temperature and fiber volume fraction on its mechanical properties. Polym Polym Compos 2021; 29(9): S780–S789.
43. 10.1177/089270571140184610.1177/0892705711401846 ↗
44. Sonmez M Alexandrescu L Niţuică M et al. Layered composites based on recycled PET/Functionalized Woven Flax Fibres. RAN 2017: 4–5.10.11159/icnnfc17.144 ↗
45. 10.1186/2193-1801-2-62910.1186/2193-1801-2-629 ↗
46. ASTM D 5229. Standard test method for moisture absorption properties and equilibrium conditioning of polymer matrix composite materials. Annu B ASTM Stand 2004; 92(March).
47. 10.1088/1757-899X/764/1/01204410.1088/1757-899X/764/1/012044 ↗
48. 10.1007/s11043-012-9175-z10.1007/s11043-012-9175-z ↗
49. 10.1177/00219983760100010110.1177/002199837601000101 ↗
50. 10.1177/07316844860050020510.1177/073168448600500205 ↗
51. Taib MNAM, Julkapli NM. Dimensional stability of natural fiber-based and hybrid composites. Mechanical and physical testing of biocomposites, fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites. Elsevier Ltd, 2018, pp. 61–79.
52. 10.1038/s41598-018-37146-w10.1038/s41598-018-37146-w ↗
53. 10.3390/polym1012133810.3390/polym10121338 ↗
54. 10.3390/ma1306132710.3390/ma13061327 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.005 ↗
56. 10.1177/168781401666425810.1177/1687814016664258 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jrras.2015.06.00410.1016/j.jrras.2015.06.004 ↗
58. 10.1088/1757-899X/368/1/01201410.1088/1757-899X/368/1/012014 ↗
59. 10.1590/S1516-1439201000030002210.1590/S1516-14392010000300022 ↗
60. Neher B, Gafur MA, Al-Mansur MA, et al. Investigation of the surface morphology and structural characterization of Palm Fiber Reinforced Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (PF-ABS) composites. Mater Sci Appl 2014; 05(06): 378–386.
61. 10.1177/002199831560204910.1177/0021998315602049 ↗