journal article·2021-06

Effect of particle size, fiber content, and surface treatment on the mechanical properties of maple-reinforced LLDPE produced by rotational molding

Fatima Ezzahra Hanana, Denis Rodrigue

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 29· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, composites based on linear low-density polyethylene and maple wood fibers with and without surface treatment with maleated polyethylene (MAPE) were prepared by dry blending, followed by rotomolding to study the effect of particle size, fiber content, and surface treatment. From the samples produced, a complete characterization of the morphological and mechanical properties was performed. The results obtained showed that MAPE surface treatment improved the fiber–matrix interface quality, which improved the homogeneity, the thermal stability, and the mechanical properties of the composites. The results showed that the effect of particle size was significant as the tensile modulus increased by 7%, 40%, and 73% for 125–250, 250–355, and 355–500 µm at 30 wt% of maple fibers. The tensile strength also increased by 114% at the same fiber loading (30 wt%) when the particle size increased from 125–250 µm to 355–500 μm. Finally, the impact strength with 355–500 µm particles was 52% higher than for 125–250 µm particles at 30 wt%
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Wood Treatment and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and CERMA, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
3. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351::AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351::AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
4. 10.1163/15685540778210657310.1163/156855407782106573 ↗
5. Torres FG · Polym Compos · 2004 · 12 · 110.1177/096739110401200101 ↗
6. Mahfoudh A. Étude de la production et de la caractérisation de composites bio-plastiques [A study on the production and characterization of polymer biocomposites) . MSc Thesis, Laval University, Canada, 2013.
7. Kabir MM · 94
8. Lee KY · 24
9. 10.1080/09276440.2016.118455610.1080/09276440.2016.1184556 ↗
10. 10.1177/09673911180260040410.1177/096739111802600404 ↗
11. 10.1002/mame.20070031510.1002/mame.200700315 ↗
12. 10.1177/073168440607252610.1177/0731684406072526 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.2431410.1002/pen.24314 ↗
14. 10.1080/09276440.2016.114416310.1080/09276440.2016.1144163 ↗
15. Verdaguer A
16. Raymond A
17. 10.1007/s00107-005-0072-x10.1007/s00107-005-0072-x ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2057810.1002/pc.20578 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.004 ↗
21. 10.1002/j.1941-9635.2015.tb01960.x10.1002/j.1941-9635.2015.tb01960.x ↗
22. Crawford RJ · 1997
23. 10.1080/03602559.2014.97705310.1080/03602559.2014.977053 ↗
24. Ameh AO · Leonardo Elect J Pract Technol · 2015 · 26 · 65
25. 10.1002/app.3526410.1002/app.35264 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.01610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.016 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10973-010-0836-310.1007/s10973-010-0836-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.02710.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.027 ↗
29. Raymond A
30. 10.1177/073168441037877910.1177/0731684410378779 ↗
31. Raj R
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.003 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00107-011-0531-510.1007/s00107-011-0531-5 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2331610.1002/pc.23316 ↗
35. 10.1080/00914037.2011.61733810.1080/00914037.2011.617338 ↗
36. 10.1177/002199831143567510.1177/0021998311435675 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2015910.1002/pc.20159 ↗
38. 10.14314/polimery.2011.37510.14314/polimery.2011.375 ↗