journal article·2017-05

Influence of Fibre Treatment on the Characteristics of Buriti and Ramie Polyester Composites

Alessandra Lavoratti, Daiane Romanzini, Sandro C. Amico, Ademir J. Zattera

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 25· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Natural fibres have recently attracted interest due to their beneficial characteristics such as low cost and biodegradability. This work aims to characterise in natura, washed and alkali-treated buriti and ramie fibres and to evaluate the influence of the chemical treatments in the mechanical and dynamic mechanical performances of their composites produced by resin transfer moulding (RTM). Fibres were cut to 45 mm in length, washed in distilled water and treated with 2, 5 and 10 wt.% sodium hydroxide solutions. The chemical composition of the washed fibres was not altered. The 2 wt.% NaOH solution increased the flexural strength of polyester/ramie composites by 70%, and improved the impact performance of the alkali-treated polyester/buriti composites. The polyester/ramie composites exhibited superior dynamic mechanical properties and better adhesion at the fibre/matrix interface, and the morphology of buriti limited the fibre wettability during the RTM processing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

*Post-graduate Program in Engineering of Processes and Technologies (PGEPROTEC), Technology and Polymer Materials Processes Group (NTPOL), University of Caxias do Sul (UCS), Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil

Post-graduate Program in Mining, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (PPGEM), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Santos R.S. · Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. · 2010 · 41 · 492
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-373-7.00014-710.1016/B978-1-78242-373-7.00014-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.04010.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.08610.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.086 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.00510.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.007 ↗
9. 10.1002/app.1046010.1002/app.10460 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.023 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.03810.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.038 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10570-013-0094-110.1007/s10570-013-0094-1 ↗
13. Ornaghi H.L. · Cellulose Chem. Technol. · 2016 · 50 · 15
14. 10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00059-X10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00059-X ↗
15. 10.1080/15583724.2014.97112410.1080/15583724.2014.971124 ↗
16. 10.1590/S1516-1439201200500005010.1590/S1516-14392012005000050 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.008 ↗
18. 10.1177/073168441245998210.1177/0731684412459982 ↗
19. 10.1177/089270570707889610.1177/0892705707078896 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.08.03510.1016/j.matlet.2009.08.035 ↗
21. 10.1002/app.3852410.1002/app.38524 ↗
22. Ndazi B.S. · Bioresources · 2007 · 3 · 126710.15376/biores.3.4.1267-1277 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.031 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.04810.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.048 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.02910.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.029 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.02910.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.029 ↗