Effect of Graphite and Carbon Black Fillers on the Processability, Electrical Conductivity and Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene-Based Bipolar Plates
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the hybrid effect between graphite and carbon black in a polypropylene (PP) matrix, based on optical microscopy. PP sheets filled with various types of carbon black and graphite were prepared, and the effects of fillers on the flowability, electrical conductivity and mechanical properties were investigated. The effects of three kinds of carbon black with different specific surface areas (65, 770, 1400 m 2 /g) on the increase of conductivity in the polypropylene (PP) matrix were compared. The best performance was observed when the carbon black with the highest specific surface was used; therefore it was used for preparing the hybrid-filled (graphite – carbon black) materials by melt blending. Optical microscopic studies proved that the carbon black exerted not only a direct but also an indirect influence on the conductivity and on the mechanical properties of the hybrid composites, as it influenced the distribution of graphite significantly. At lower graphite contents the material became more flexible because of the better dispersion of graphite, but at higher carbon black contents the stiffness increased significantly.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Polymer Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Műegyetem rkp. 3, Hungary
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.310.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.3 ↗
2. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.3710.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.37 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.08.00510.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.08.005 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.074 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.09710.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.097 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.03610.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.036 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.02.01710.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.02.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.014 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.065 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.09610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.096 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.041 ↗
12. Stauffer D. · 1994
13. 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.05610.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.056 ↗
14. Derieth T. · J. New Mat. Elect. Syst. · 2008 · 11 · 21
15. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.11.01310.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.11.013 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.04910.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.049 ↗
19. 10.1002/pen.2017710.1002/pen.20177 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0304-3886(99)00041-810.1016/S0304-3886(99)00041-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.04410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.044 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.02910.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.029 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.10610.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.106 ↗