Experimental Studies of Stiffness Degradation and Dissipated Energy in Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite under Fatigue Loading
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, tensile and compressive properties and fatigue performances of laminated glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite under constant amplitude sinusoidal load control at frequency of 5 Hz and at room temperature were investigated for three different types of loading: tension-tension at R=0.1 and 0.5, reverse loading tension-compression at R=-1 and compression-compression at R=2 and 10 in the fibre and normal-to-fibre directions. From these series of tests, the corresponding S-N diagrams were obtained. The dynamic stiffness during fatigue loading showed classical degradation of the GFRP laminates. It was observed that the dynamic modulus decreased with time, and the hysteresis loop area changed with some distortion according to the loading conditions. Finally hysteresis loops throughout fatigue testing were examined, and the variation of energy dissipated per cycle throughout the specimen lifetime was quantified. It was demonstrated that the dissipated energy during the fatigue lifetime is dependent on R-ratio and fibre orientation. However, in majority of the cases, the energy dissipated per cycle near the end of the fatigue lifetime increases as a result of an increase in the area captured by hysteresis loops.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Kingston University London, SW15 3DW, UK
Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult (ORE), Blyth, Northumberland, NE24 1LZ, UK
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0266-3538(85)90088-010.1016/0266-3538(85)90088-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00084-610.1016/S0142-1123(01)00084-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.03810.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.038 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.02.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2007.02.008 ↗
5. 10.1039/C5NR01354B10.1039/C5NR01354B ↗
6. 10.1177/073168440934465210.1177/0731684409344652 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.01210.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.012 ↗
8. 10.2514/3.5091210.2514/3.50912 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00142-610.1016/S0263-8223(97)00142-6 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00090-510.1016/S1359-835X(96)00090-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.020 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12206-012-0526-010.1007/s12206-012-0526-0 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.402969110.1115/1.4029691 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00052-610.1016/S1359-835X(03)00052-6 ↗
15. ASTM E739-91, “Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life (SN) and strain-life (eN) fatigue data,” (2004).
16. 10.1533/9781855738577.1.310.1533/9781855738577.1.3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.028 ↗
18. Schulte K. · Sixth International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCMVI) · 1987
19. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00194-310.1016/S0142-1123(01)00194-3 ↗
20. 10.1520/STP34323S10.1520/STP34323S ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00082-910.1016/S0266-3538(02)00082-9 ↗
22. Brøndsted P. · Polymeric composites—expanding the limits. Proceedings of the 18th Risø International Symposium on Materials Science, Risø International Laboratory · 1997
23. 10.1007/978-1-84996-181-310.1007/978-1-84996-181-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.57910.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.579 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.021 ↗