journal article·2021-06

Nondestructive health monitoring techniques for composite materials: A review

M Senthilkumar, TG Sreekanth, S Manikanta Reddy

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 29· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Structural health monitoring is the process of acquisition and analyzing technical data obtained from structures to determine the present condition of the structure and residual life. Composites have been widely in use because of their low weight and better mechanical properties compared to conventional metals. They are more prone to damage during cyclic loading and the impact of foreign objects. So, usage of the nondestructive techniques is important to detect such damage in composites at the beginning stage itself, which further helps to avoid catastrophic failure. Many review articles are discussing a single nondestructive technique to monitor the health of the structure, but a single technique is not sufficient in most of the cases. This review is focused on the most commonly used nondestructive health monitoring techniques such as acoustic emission, vibration testing, ultrasonic testing, infrared thermography, and shearography to detect and characterize the damage in composite structures used in aerospace, automotive, and marine applications. The comparison among the techniques also has been presented in this review.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Production Engineering, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

References (95)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1098/rspa.2007.183410.1098/rspa.2007.1834 ↗
2. 10.1002/9781118985960.meh11010.1002/9781118985960.meh110 ↗
3. 10.1177/14777606160320010110.1177/147776061603200101 ↗
4. Jollivet T · 66 · 746
5. 10.1177/002199830203600751210.1177/0021998302036007512 ↗
6. 10.1016/B978-0-12-409605-9.00005-210.1016/B978-0-12-409605-9.00005-2 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-0-85729-284-110.1007/978-0-85729-284-1 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.006 ↗
9. 10.1155/2018/826029810.1155/2018/8260298 ↗
10. 10.1177/1748006X1774277710.1177/1748006X17742777 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.03410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.034 ↗
12. 10.1002/047009286610.1002/0470092866 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.10.00210.1016/j.ymssp.2006.10.002 ↗
14. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, et al. Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA13070-MS, 1996.10.2172/249299 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.02610.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.026 ↗
16. 10.2172/105563610.2172/1055636 ↗
17. 10.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00079-610.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00079-6 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00087-810.1016/S0266-3538(02)00087-8 ↗
19. 10.1533/9780857090928.2.19310.1533/9780857090928.2.193 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.032 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.02410.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/0963-8695(94)90007-810.1016/0963-8695(94)90007-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.023 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.012 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.05.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.05.009 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.01510.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.015 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.008 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.013 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.03.01110.1016/j.apacoust.2018.03.011 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.046 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.016 ↗
33. 10.1177/089270571557364910.1177/0892705715573649 ↗
34. 10.1590/1679-7825172210.1590/1679-78251722 ↗
35. Finotti RP · 199 · 3314
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:2(384)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:2(384) ↗
37. 10.1016/0016-0032(91)90023-V10.1016/0016-0032(91)90023-V ↗
38. 10.12989/sem.2005.19.1.02110.12989/sem.2005.19.1.021 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.003 ↗
40. 10.1006/jsvi.2002.511910.1006/jsvi.2002.5119 ↗
41. Mahieddine C · 149 · 02015
42. Malekjafarian A · Shock Vib · 2015 · 2015
43. 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.00310.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.025 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0997-7538(02)01228-710.1016/S0997-7538(02)01228-7 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.020 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.05.00310.1016/j.jsv.2013.05.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.05410.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.054 ↗
49. Salawu OS · 933
50. 10.1177/109963620706724110.1177/1099636207067241 ↗
51. Li H · Int J Innov Comput Inf Control · 2005 · 1 · 625
52. 10.1115/1.130312110.1115/1.1303121 ↗
53. Boyes W. Instrumentation reference book. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2009, pp. 567–592.
54. Scottish School of Non-Destructive Testing. Walt Boyes instrumentation reference book. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010, pp. 567–592.10.1016/B978-0-7506-8308-1.00031-0 ↗
55. 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00067-010.1016/S1359-8368(99)00067-0 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.010 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.014 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.13910.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.139 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.07.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.07.002 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.14310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.143 ↗
61. 10.5545/sv-jme.2010.17010.5545/sv-jme.2010.170 ↗
62. 10.1177/109963621245686110.1177/1099636212456861 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.001 ↗
64. Thompson RB, Begum S. NDT techniques: ultrasonic in reference module in materials science and materials engineering. 2017, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.02684-9.10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.02684-9 ↗
65. 10.3390/app908162810.3390/app9081628 ↗
66. Kersemans M · Multidiscip Digital Publish Instit · 2018 · 2 · 554
67. Segreto T · 2018 · 45
68. 10.3390/s14071230510.3390/s140712305 ↗
69. Wiecek B. · 686
70. Cheng L · J Sens · 2012 · 7
71. 10.1007/978-1-4471-1995-1_110.1007/978-1-4471-1995-1_1 ↗
72. 10.1108/0003559971018319910.1108/00035599710183199 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.09.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2010.09.002 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.021 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.053 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.01.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.01.013 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.proche.2012.06.02410.1016/j.proche.2012.06.024 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.006 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.004 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.010 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.12010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.120 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.005 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.03.00410.1016/j.materresbull.2014.03.004 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.032 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.005 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.09.00510.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.09.005 ↗
87. Avdelidis NP · 8013 · 80131310.1117/12.887403 ↗
88. Srinivas K · 12 · 7
89. 10.1016/j.mser.2005.04.00110.1016/j.mser.2005.04.001 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.07.01210.1016/j.ndteint.2005.07.012 ↗
91. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00109-410.1016/S0263-8223(00)00109-4 ↗
92. 10.1243/095441098153210810.1243/0954410981532108 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.07.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2011.07.007 ↗
94. Jefferson AJ, Arumugam V, Dhakal H. Repair of polymer composites: methodology, techniques, and challenges. Cambridge: Woodhead, 2018, p. 127.
95. 10.1243/030932498151289610.1243/0309324981512896 ↗