Characterization of mechanical and thermal properties of esterified lignin modified polypropylene composites filled with chitosan fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
A comparative study was performed on the use of esterified alkaline lignin (AAL) and esterified organosolv lignin (AOSL) as the interfacial modifying agent to improve the properties of polypropylene-chitosan composites. Chitosan was chemically modified through a reaction with the esterified lignin in an alcohol medium. The composites were prepared using an internal mixer and hot-pressed method. Both modified chitosan showed a different chemical structure upon modification with the esterified lignins as confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra. With a lower molecular weight, the AOSL attachment on the chitosan surface resulted in more efficiency in decreasing hydrophilic characters. Tensile tests showed the increased tensile strength by 32.15% and 26.43% for AOSL-modified composites and AAL-modified composites as compared with the unmodified composites. Overall, the AOSL was superior in improving the mechanical strength and thermal stability of the composites, while the AAL exhibited the most apparent enhancement in ductility and crystallization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Medan Area, Medan, Indonesia
Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Medan Area, Medan, Indonesia
Department of Polymer and Textile Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Kuantan, Malaysia
Funding
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of Indonesia for research
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10582210.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105822 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107149 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.09010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.090 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2472610.1002/pc.24726 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.05410.1016/j.jece.2017.11.054 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.04010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.040 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.06910.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.069 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2542610.1002/pc.25426 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.27010.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.270 ↗
11. 10.1080/0360255100368181210.1080/03602551003681812 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60139-610.1016/S1672-6529(14)60139-6 ↗
13. 10.1007/s42235-019-0016-510.1007/s42235-019-0016-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.01210.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.01610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12225410.1016/j.polymer.2020.122254 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12221-014-0800-010.1007/s12221-014-0800-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.030 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.07210.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.072 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.07.00710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.07.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.02410.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.024 ↗
22. Ren D · J Appl Polym Sci · 2016 · 133 · 4419
23. 10.1007/978-3-642-74065-7_1710.1007/978-3-642-74065-7_17 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.03.01810.1016/j.jiec.2016.03.018 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.023 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tca.2015.04.00710.1016/j.tca.2015.04.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.01610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.016 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.00610.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.006 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10771710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107717 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10973-006-8077-110.1007/s10973-006-8077-1 ↗