Rain erosion-resistant coatings for wind turbine blades: A review
Source abstract
Abstract
Wind blades are the most expensive parts of wind turbines made from fibre-reinforced polymer composites. The blades play a critical role on the energy production, but they are prone to damage like any other composite components. Leading edge (LE) erosion of the wind turbine blades is one of the common damages, causing a reduction in the annual energy production especially in offshore wind turbine farms. This erosion can be caused by rain, sand and flying solid particles. Coating the blade against erosion using appropriate materials can drastically reduce these losses and hence is of great interest. The sol–gel technique is a convenient method to manufacture thin film coatings, which can protect the blades against the rain erosion, while having negligible effect on the weight of the blades. This article provides an extensive review of the liquid erosion mechanism, water erosion testing procedures and the contributing factors to the erosion of the LE of wind turbine blades. Techniques for improving the erosion resistance of the LE using carbon nanotubes and graphene nano-additives are also discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Icing and De-icing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering & Environment, Kingston University London, London, UK
School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, London, UK
LYN Coatings Ltd, Gillingham, UK
Haydale Composite Solutions Ltd, Leicestershire, UK
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Somani S, Koenig H. KPMG, https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/sg/pdf/2016/11/Global-Trends-in-Renewable-Energy.pdf (accessed 04 September 2018).
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/3/03300110.1088/0964-1726/24/3/033001 ↗
3. Fiore G · 2016
4. 10.1088/0957-0233/19/12/12200110.1088/0957-0233/19/12/122001 ↗
5. Larsen F
6. 10.1088/0022-3727/46/38/38300110.1088/0022-3727/46/38/383001 ↗
7. 10.1002/1099-1824(200001/03)3:1<1::AID-WE28>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/1099-1824(200001/03)3:1<1::AID-WE28>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
8. Martino J. Power-eng.com, http://www.power-eng.com/articles/print/volume-118/issue-3/features/advancements-in-wind-turbine-technology-improving-efficiency-and-reducing-cost.html (2014, accessed 12 December 2017).
9. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.35.100303.11064110.1146/annurev.matsci.35.100303.110641 ↗
10. 10.3390/ma1010115210.3390/ma10101152 ↗
11. 10.1177/0309524X1770686210.1177/0309524X17706862 ↗
12. 10.3390/ma1011128510.3390/ma10111285 ↗
13. 10.3390/en1009142010.3390/en10091420 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.00210.1016/j.renene.2017.09.002 ↗
15. 10.1002/we.164910.1002/we.1649 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma1010114610.3390/ma10101146 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.09.01610.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.09.016 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.wear.2009.02.00910.1016/j.wear.2009.02.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.08.01310.1016/j.compfluid.2016.08.013 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.wear.2015.01.07910.1016/j.wear.2015.01.079 ↗
21. Sun & Wind Energy. Eradicating blade damage, http://www.sunwindenergy.com/wind-energy/eradicating-blade-damage (2014, accessed 02 January 2019).
22. Rempel L · Wind Systems Mag · 2012 · 22
23. 10.1016/j.wear.2018.07.00810.1016/j.wear.2018.07.008 ↗
24. Kithil R. Lightningsafety.com. Louisville: National Lightning Safety Institute, http://www.lightningsafety.com/nlsi_lhm/wind_blade_damage.pdf (2008, accessed 12 January 2018).
25. 10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.04310.1016/j.renene.2018.04.043 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.14610.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.146 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.00810.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.008 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41598-017-04282-810.1038/s41598-017-04282-8 ↗
29. 10.5194/wes-3-729-201810.5194/wes-3-729-2018 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.12.00610.1016/j.jweia.2016.12.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.12.00710.1016/j.jweia.2016.12.007 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.06.02210.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.06.022 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.10.02410.1016/j.anucene.2015.10.024 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.03.01610.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.03.016 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.07.03910.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.07.039 ↗
36. Heymann F. · 1992 · 221
37. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.11.02210.1016/j.wear.2006.11.022 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11661-013-2180-210.1007/s11661-013-2180-2 ↗
39. 10.1007/BF0298429210.1007/BF02984292 ↗
40. DeCorso S · Am Soc Test Mater Proc · 1964 · 64 · 782
41. 10.1179/bct.2000.99.1.110.1179/bct.2000.99.1.1 ↗
42. 10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.00052510.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.000525 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.12.05810.1016/j.wear.2010.12.058 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.03910.1016/j.wear.2006.12.039 ↗
45. 10.1016/0043-1648(81)90257-X10.1016/0043-1648(81)90257-X ↗
46. Wasley RJ · 1973
47. 10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.03610.1016/j.renene.2015.02.036 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.wear.2011.02.02310.1016/j.wear.2011.02.023 ↗
49. Tobin E
50. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.04.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2011.04.001 ↗
51. 10.1021/cm001257z10.1021/cm001257z ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.04110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.041 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.11810.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.118 ↗
54. 10.1016/0043-1648(95)07187-310.1016/0043-1648(95)07187-3 ↗
55. 10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00191-X10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00191-X ↗
56. Ikohagi T.
57. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.02510.1016/j.wear.2012.12.025 ↗
58. Heymann FJ.
59. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.06.01510.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.06.015 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10971-004-5779-310.1007/s10971-004-5779-3 ↗
61. 10.1155/S1023621X0300004610.1155/S1023621X03000046 ↗
62. 10.1007/BF0027161510.1007/BF00271615 ↗
63. 10.1016/0022-3093(90)90171-H10.1016/0022-3093(90)90171-H ↗
64. 10.1016/S1359-0286(00)00009-710.1016/S1359-0286(00)00009-7 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.cis.2007.12.00610.1016/j.cis.2007.12.006 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.04510.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.045 ↗
67. 10.1016/B978-0-85709-211-3.00005-410.1016/B978-0-85709-211-3.00005-4 ↗
68. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01322-010.1016/S0040-6090(01)01322-0 ↗
69. Introduction to sol-gel, http://www.ceramics.mmat.ubc.ca/introduction.html (2006, accessed 1 November 2017).
70. 10.1021/nl015614w10.1021/nl015614w ↗
71. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.04310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.043 ↗
72. Attia S · J Mater Sci Technol · 2002 · 18 · 211
73. Kickelbick G · 2007
74. 10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.00610.1016/j.wear.2004.09.006 ↗
75. 10.1063/1.32535710.1063/1.325357 ↗
76. 10.1149/1.208556310.1149/1.2085563 ↗
77. 10.1002/pen.1037310.1002/pen.10373 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.14610.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.146 ↗
79. 10.1007/s13726-016-0440-x10.1007/s13726-016-0440-x ↗
80. 10.1023/A:100866090910810.1023/A:1008660909108 ↗
81. Aegerter M · 2017 · 1
82. 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00682-210.1016/S0040-6090(97)00682-2 ↗
83. 10.1016/0257-8972(88)90181-810.1016/0257-8972(88)90181-8 ↗
84. ASTM D3359-02 · 2002
85. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.08110.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.081 ↗
86. 10.1021/ie500620r10.1021/ie500620r ↗
87. Ketonen M · 2011
88. 10.3390/coatings703003710.3390/coatings7030037 ↗
89. 10.1039/C5NR01354B10.1039/C5NR01354B ↗
90. 10.1108/0305612121122230910.1108/03056121211222309 ↗
91. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0368910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03689 ↗
92. 10.1038/363603a010.1038/363603a0 ↗
93. 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
94. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-39310.1186/1556-276X-9-393 ↗
95. 10.1021/ar010164010.1021/ar0101640 ↗
96. Dresselhaus M, Dresselhaus G, Saito RC. Physics of carbon nanotubes. 1995; 33(7): 883–891.10.1016/0008-6223(95)00017-8 ↗
97. 10.1134/S107036321102011310.1134/S1070363211020113 ↗
98. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
99. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/27571410.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275714 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.01910.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.019 ↗