Detection of Voids in Carbon/Epoxy Laminates and Their Influence on Mechanical Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Defects, such as voids and delaminations, may significantly reduce the mechanical performance of components made of composite laminates. Distributed voids and porosity are generated during composite processing and are influenced by prepreg characteristics as well as by curing cycle parameters. On the basis of rheological and thermal analyses, as well as observations of laminates produced by different processing conditions, curing pressure appears the most influent factor affecting the void content. This work compares different methods for void analysis and quantitative evaluation (ultrasonic scan, micro-computed tomography, acid digestion, SEM image analysis) evidencing their applicative limitations. Carbon/epoxy laminates were produced in autoclave or oven by vacuum bag technique, using different processing conditions, so that void contents ranging from 0% to 7% volume were obtained. Effects of porosity over laminates mechanical performances are analysed. The results of tensile and compressive tests are discussed, considering the effect that different curing cycles have over void content as well as over fibre/resin fraction. Interlaminar strength, as measured by short beam shear tests, which is a matrix-dominated property, exhibits a reduction of failure strength up to 25% in laminates with the highest void content, compared to laminates with no porosity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy
Dipartimento di Meccanica, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy
Technologies Lab Non-metallic Materials Science, AgustaWestland, 21017 Cascina Costa VA, Italy
NDI Unit, AgustaWestland, 21017 Cascina Costa VA, Italy
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.290276710.1063/1.2902767 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.1007510.1002/pc.10075 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00012-910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00012-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00157-910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00157-9 ↗
5. 10.1016/0263-8223(94)90044-210.1016/0263-8223(94)90044-2 ↗
6. Makeev A. · Proc. 26th ICAF Symp. · 2011 · 119
7. 10.1177/002199831142961810.1177/0021998311429618 ↗
8. 10.1177/09673911150230040110.1177/096739111502300401 ↗
9. Kastner J. · 2nd Int. Symp. on NDT in Aerospace · 2010
10. 10.1177/002199830810422910.1177/0021998308104229 ↗
11. Chu T. · Proc. of the 2001 Soc. for Experim. Mech. (SEM) Ann. Conf. · 2001 · 571
12. 10.1784/insi.46.11.681.5228010.1784/insi.46.11.681.52280 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0056601210.1007/BF00566012 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60028-510.1016/S1005-0302(11)60028-5 ↗
16. 10.1515/SECM.2002.10.2.7710.1515/SECM.2002.10.2.77 ↗
17. Hexcel Hexply ® 6376 175 °C Curing Epoxy Matrix — Material Safety Data Sheet, 2007, http://www.hexcel.com
18. Hexcel Hexply ® 6376 175 °C Curing Epoxy Matrix — Technical Data Sheet, 2007, http://www.hexcel.com
19. 10.1177/002199830809823410.1177/0021998308098234 ↗
20. ClementsL.L., Fiber Composite Materials, in Metals Handbook, vol.9 - Metallography and Microstructures, 9th ed., pp. 587–597, ed. ASM, Materials Park OH, USA (1985).
21. BakerA., DuttonS., and KellyD., Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures, cap. 5, p. 127, 2 nd ed. AIAA, Reston VA, USA (2004).
22. 10.1007/978-94-011-1264-210.1007/978-94-011-1264-2 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.75009030810.1002/pc.750090308 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70385-510.1016/S0065-2156(08)70385-5 ↗