journal article·2024-07-27

Design and Analysis of a Terahertz Metasurface-Based Refractive Index Sensor for Hemoglobin Detection With Behaviour Prediction Using Polynomial Regression

Jacob Wekalao, Ngaira Mandela, Jonas Muheki, Adeeb Zaid

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Terahertz technology and applications · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Tariq Z, Qadeer MI, Anjum I, Hano C, Anjum S (2023) Thalassemia and nanotheragnostics: advanced approaches for diagnosis and treatment. Biosensors 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios1304045010.3390/bios13040450 ↗
2. Garcia-Casal MN, Dary O, Jefferds ME, Pasricha SR (2023) Diagnosing anemia: Challenges selecting methods, addressing underlying causes, and implementing actions at the public health level. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1524(1):37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.1499610.1111/nyas.14996 ↗
3. Zhang L et al (2024) Comprehensive review of solid tumor bone marrow metastasis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.10424810.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104248 ↗
4. Shahrabi S, Saki N, Safa M, Pezeshki SMS (2023) Complete blood count test in rheumatology: not just a screening test. Clin Lab 69(6):1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2022.22101210.7754/Clin.Lab.2022.221012 ↗
5. Khodadadi R et al (2024) An integrated centrifugal microfluidic strategy for point-of-care complete blood counting. Biosens Bioelectron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2023.11578910.1016/j.bios.2023.115789 ↗
6. Doeleman MJH, Esseveld A, Huisman A, de Roock S, Tiel Groenestege WM (2023) Stability and comparison of complete blood count parameters between capillary and venous blood samples. Int J Lab Hematol 45(5):659–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.1408010.1111/ijlh.14080 ↗
7. Choukem SP et al (2020) Evaluation of the accuracy of two point-of-care haemoglobin meters used in sub-Saharan African population: A cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01371-x10.1186/s12872-020-01371-x ↗
8. Gong AK, Backenstose B (1999) Evaluation of the Hb-Quick®: A portable hemoglobinometer. J Clin Monit Comput 15(3–4):171–177. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100994660342210.1023/A:1009946603422 ↗
9. Adam I, Ahmed S, Mahmoud MH, Yassin MI (2012) Comparison of HemoCue ®hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan. Diagn Pathol 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-3010.1186/1746-1596-7-30 ↗
10. Pinto C, Parab J, Naik G (2020) Non-invasive hemoglobin measurement using embedded platform. Sens Bio-Sensing Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2020.10037010.1016/j.sbsr.2020.100370 ↗
11. Cheung A, Tu L, Macnab A, Kwon BK, Shadgan B (2022) Detection of hypoxia by near-infrared spectroscopy and pulse oximetry: a comparative study. J Biomed Opt 27(7). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.27.7.07700110.1117/1.jbo.27.7.077001 ↗
12. Al-Halawani R, Charlton PH, Qassem M, Kyriacou PA (2023) A review of the effect of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy. Physiol Meas 44(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/acd51a10.1088/1361-6579/acd51a ↗
13. Vitorino R, Barros AS, Guedes S, Caixeta DC, Sabino-Silva R (2023) Diagnostic and monitoring applications using near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy in cancer and other diseases. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.10363310.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103633 ↗
14. Moses JC, Adibi S, Wickramasinghe N, Nguyen L, Angelova M, Islam SMS (2024) Non-invasive blood glucose monitoring technology in diabetes management: review. mHealth. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-23-910.21037/mhealth-23-9 ↗
15. Singh AK, Mittal S, Das M, Saharia A, Tiwari M (2023) Optical biosensors: a decade in review. Alex Eng J 67:673–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.04010.1016/j.aej.2022.12.040 ↗
16. Malik S et al (2023) Nanomaterials-based biosensor and their applications: A review. Heliyon 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1992910.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19929 ↗
17. Wilkirson EC et al (2023) Affinity-based electrochemical sensors for biomolecular detection in whole blood. Anal Bioanal Chem 415(18):3983–4002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04627-510.1007/s00216-023-04627-5 ↗
18. Dey S, Dolci M, Zijlstra P (2023) Single-molecule optical biosensing: recent advances and future challenges. ACS Phys Chem Au 3(2):143–156. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c0006110.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00061 ↗
19. Chandra P (2023) Personalized biosensors for point-of-care diagnostics: from bench to bedside applications. Nanotheranostics 7(2):210–215. https://doi.org/10.7150/ntno.8148510.7150/ntno.81485 ↗
20. Kuznetsov AI et al (2024) Roadmap for optical metasurfaces. ACS Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c0045710.1021/acsphotonics.3c00457 ↗
21. Chen MK et al (2021) Principles, functions, and applications of optical meta-lens. Adv Opt Mater 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.20200141410.1002/adom.202001414 ↗
22. Li A, Singh S, Sievenpiper D (2018) Metasurfaces and their applications. Nanophotonics 7(6):989–1011. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2017-012010.1515/nanoph-2017-0120 ↗
23. Mascaretti L et al (2023) Designing metasurfaces for efficient solar energy conversion. ACS Photonics 10(12):4079–4103. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c0101310.1021/acsphotonics.3c01013 ↗
24. Saifullah Y, He Y, Boag A, Yang GM, Xu F (2022) Recent progress in reconfigurable and intelligent metasurfaces: a comprehensive review of tuning mechanisms, hardware designs, and applications. Adv Sci 9(33). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20220374710.1002/advs.202203747 ↗
25. Patel SK et al (2020) Graphene-Based Highly Sensitive Refractive Index Biosensors Using C-Shaped Metasurface. IEEE Sens J 20(12):6359–6366. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.297657110.1109/JSEN.2020.2976571 ↗
26. Jain PK, Lee KS, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA (2006) Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: Applications in biological imaging and biomedicine. J Phys Chem B 110(14):7238–7248. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp057170o10.1021/jp057170o ↗
27. Zhang S et al (2021) Metasurfaces for biomedical applications: Imaging and sensing from a nanophotonics perspective. Nanophotonics 10(1):259–293. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-037310.1515/nanoph-2020-0373 ↗
28. Abbaszadeh A, Rash-Ahmadi S (2024) A surface plasmon resonance sensor based on photonic crystal fiber composed of magnesium fluoride and graphene layers to detect aqueous solutions. Opt Quantum Electron 56(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-06853-210.1007/s11082-024-06853-2 ↗
29. Razaq A, Bibi F, Zheng X, Papadakis R, Jafri SHM, Li H (2022) Review on graphene-, graphene oxide-, reduced graphene oxide-based flexible composites: from fabrication to applications. Materials 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1503101210.3390/ma15031012 ↗
30. Smith AT, LaChance AM, Zeng S, Liu B, Sun L (2019) Synthesis, properties, and applications of graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide and their nanocomposites. Nano Mater Sci 1(1):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.00410.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.004 ↗
31. Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2017) Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 90:75–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 ↗
32. Jiříčková A, Jankovský O, Sofer Z, Sedmidubský D (2022) Synthesis and applications of graphene oxide. Materials 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1503092010.3390/ma15030920 ↗
33. Mbayachi VB, Ndayiragije E, Sammani T, Taj S, Mbuta ER, Ullah Khan A (2021) Graphene synthesis, characterization and its applications: A review. Res Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2021.10016310.1016/j.rechem.2021.100163 ↗
34. Liu J, Bao S, Wang X (2022) Applications of graphene-based materials in sensors: a review. Micromachines 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1302018410.3390/mi13020184 ↗
35. Catania F et al (2021) A review on recent advancements of graphene and graphene-related materials in biological applications. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 11(2):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1102061410.3390/app11020614 ↗
36. Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6(3):183–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat184910.1038/nmat1849 ↗
37. Wekalao J, Albargi HB, Patel SK, Jalalah M, Almawgani AHM (2024) Terahertz optical ultrasensitive glucose detection using graphene and silver surface plasmon resonance metasurfaces for biomedical applications. Plasmonics 123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-024-02278-510.1007/s11468-024-02278-5 ↗
38. Patel SK, Parmar J, Katkar V (2022) Ultra-broadband, wide-angle plus-shape slotted metamaterial solar absorber design with absorption forecasting using machine learning. Sci Rep 12(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14509-y10.1038/s41598-022-14509-y ↗
39. Chen YS, Huang CH, Pai PC. Seo J, Lei KF (2023) A review on microfluidics-based impedance biosensors. Biosensors 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios1301008310.3390/bios13010083 ↗
40. Patel SK et al (2022) Graphene based highly sensitive refractive index sensor using double split ring resonator metasurface. Opt Quantum Electron 54(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-03600-310.1007/s11082-022-03600-3 ↗
41. Wekalao J, Patel SK, Anushkannan NK, Alsalman O, Surve J, Parmar J (2023) Design of ring and cross shaped graphene metasurface sensor for efficient detection of malaria and 2 bit encoding applications. Diam Relat Mater 139(August):110401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.11040110.1016/j.diamond.2023.110401 ↗
42. Wekalao J, Alsalman O, Natraj NA, Surve J, Parmar J, Patel SK (2023) Design of graphene metasurface sensor for efficient detection of COVID-19. Plasmonics 123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01946-210.1007/s11468-023-01946-2 ↗
43. Aliqab K, Wekalao J, Alsharari M, Armghan A, Agravat D, Patel SK (2023) Designing a graphene metasurface organic material sensor for detection of organic compounds in wastewater. Biosensors 13(8):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios1308075910.3390/bios13080759 ↗
44. Wekalao J, Patel SK, Alsalman O, Surve J, Anushkannan NK, Parmar J (2023) Waterborne bacteria detecting highly sensitive graphene metasurface based cost-efficient and efficient refractive index sensors. Plasmonics, 123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01983-x10.1007/s11468-023-01983-x ↗
45. Patel SK, Wekalao J, Alsalman O, Surve J, Parmar J, Taya SA (2023) Development of surface plasmon resonance sensor with enhanced sensitivity for low refractive index detection. Opt Quantum Electron 55(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05265-y10.1007/s11082-023-05265-y ↗
46. Alsalman O, Wekalao J, Arun Kumar U, Agravat D, Parmar J, Patel SK (2023) Design of split ring resonator graphene metasurface sensor for efficient detection of brain tumor. Plasmonics 123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-02002-910.1007/s11468-023-02002-9 ↗
47. Wekalao J et al (2023) Graphene-based THz surface plasmon resonance biosensor for hemoglobin detection applicable in forensic science. Plasmonics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-02146-810.1007/s11468-023-02146-8 ↗
48. Almawgani AHM, Wekalao J, Patel SK, Alzahrani A, Gumaih HS, Armghan A (2024) Optimization of graphene-based square slotted surface plasmon resonance refractive index biosensor for accurate detection of pregnancy. Plasmonics 123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-024-02290-910.1007/s11468-024-02290-9 ↗
49. Aliqab K, Wekalao J, Alsharari M, Armghan A, Agravat D, Patel SK (2023) Designing a graphene metasurface organic material sensor for detection of organic compounds in wastewater. Biosensors 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios1308075910.3390/bios13080759 ↗
50. Aliqab K, Wekalao J, Alsharari M, Armghan A, Agravat D, Patel SK (2023) Designing a graphene metasurface organic material sensor for detection of organic compounds in wastewater. Biosensors 13(8):1806739. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios1308075910.3390/bios13080759 ↗
51. Wekalao J, Alsalman O, Patel H, Manvani R, Patel SK (2024) Swift detection of heavy metals in water by encoded graphene–gold-metasurface sensor. vol 56, no7. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-07140-w10.1007/s11082-024-07140-w ↗
52. Patel SK, Wekalao J, Albargi HB, Jalalah M, Almawgani AHM (2024) Design and simulation of metasurface ‑ enhanced graphene biosensors for cancer biomarker detection. Plasmonics 123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-024-02224-510.1007/s11468-024-02224-5 ↗
53. Wekalao J, Alsalman O, Shobhit RM (2024) Graphene biosensor design based on glass substrate for forensic detection of illicit drugs. Opt Quantum Electron. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-06690-310.1007/s11082-024-06690-3 ↗
54. Muheki J, Wekalao J, Albargi HB, Jalalah M, Almawgani AHM (2024) A graphene gold metasurface inspired surface plasmon resonance sensor designed for terahertz applications in sensing and detection of heavy metals in water10.1007/s11468-024-02273-w ↗
55. Wekalao J, Arun Kumar U, Hasan B, Jalalah M, Almawgani AH, Armghan A (2024) Graphene and gold metasurface-based terahertz surface plasmon resonance sensor for explosive detection. Plasmonics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-024-02229-010.1007/s11468-024-02229-0 ↗
56. Almawgani AHM, Wekalao J, Patel SK, Alzahrani A, Gumaih HS (2024) Design and development of a split ring resonator and circular disc metasurface based graphene / gold surface plasmon resonance sensor for illicit drugs detection. Plasmonics 123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-024-02306-410.1007/s11468-024-02306-4 ↗
57. Jadeja R, Surve J, Parmar T, Patel SK, Al-Zahrani FA (2023) Detection of peptides employing a THz metasurface based sensor. Diam Relat Mater 109675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2022.10967510.1016/j.diamond.2022.109675 ↗
58. Patel SK, Surve J, Parmar J (2022) Detection of cancer with graphene metasurface-based highly efficient sensors. Diam Relat Mater 129(September):109367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2022.10936710.1016/j.diamond.2022.109367 ↗
59. Nashaat D, Elsadek HA, Abdallah E, Elhenawy H, Iskander MF, Communication A (2009) Using metamaterial structures. Technology 1:7–10
60. Patel SK et al (2022) Encoding and tuning of THz metasurface-based refractive index sensor with behavior prediction using XGBoost regressor. IEEE Access 10:24797–24814. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.315438610.1109/ACCESS.2022.3154386 ↗
61. Patel SK, Surve J, Parmar J, Natesan A, Katkar V (2023) Graphene-based metasurface refractive index biosensor for hemoglobin detection: machine learning assisted optimization. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 22(2):430–437. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2022.320123710.1109/TNB.2022.3201237 ↗
62. Parnianifard A, Chaudhary S, Mumtaz S, Wuttisittikulkij L, Imran MA (2023) Expedited surrogate-based quantification of engineering tolerances using a modified polynomial regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 66(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03493-010.1007/s00158-023-03493-0 ↗
63. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) Linear methods for regression. pp 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/b94608_310.1007/b94608_3 ↗
64. James GM, Paulson C, Rusmevichientong P (2013) Penalized and Constrained Regression
65. H. de-Graft Acquah, (2010) Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of an asymmetric price relationship. J Dev Agric Econ 2(1):001–006
66. Seraj A et al (2022) Cross-validation. In: Handbook of HydroInformatics: Volume I: Classic Soft-Computing Techniques, pp 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821285-1.00021-X10.1016/B978-0-12-821285-1.00021-X ↗
67. Tibshirani R (2011) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: A retrospective. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 73(3):273–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00771.x10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00771.x ↗