Molecular Mechanisms of Stress Development in Polysaccharide Films: Insights for Biopolymer Design in Cosmetic Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
The transition from synthetic polymers to biobased polysaccharides in cosmetic formulations requires an understanding of the fundamental physical and chemical properties that govern their performance. In this study, we investigated six polysaccharides and a reference synthetic polymer by measuring key properties including glass transition temperature, crystallinity, viscosity, elastic modulus, and concentration evolution during drying. These measurements enabled the development of a quantitative model that accurately predicts the final mechanical stresses arising in polysaccharide films during the drying process. We demonstrated how crystallinity and viscosity influence stress development, providing mechanistic insights into film mechanics and their interactions with substrates such as skin for cosmetic applications. This approach is based on fundamental polymer physics and can be extended to other film-forming systems to support the integration of sustainable biopolymers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Microencapsulation and Drying Processes · Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Stanford University
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
BASF Personal Care and Nutrition GmbH
Funding
Stanford University · National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2016.09.00810.1016/j.cogsc.2016.09.008 ↗
2. 10.1038/s43017-021-00223-210.1038/s43017-021-00223-2 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0029310.1021/acs.macromol.7b00293 ↗
4. 10.1038/ncb0908-101510.1038/ncb0908-1015 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.gsf.2017.07.00710.1016/j.gsf.2017.07.007 ↗
6. 10.1080/1040923009116919510.1080/10409230091169195 ↗
7. 10.1179/1743284713Y.000000050310.1179/1743284713Y.0000000503 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aba497910.1126/science.aba4979 ↗
9. 10.1088/2515-7639/ac4ee510.1088/2515-7639/ac4ee5 ↗
10. Gawade R. P. · 2020 · 54510.1016/B978-0-12-816808-0.00017-2 ↗
11. Lochhead R. Y. · 2017 · 17110.1016/B978-0-12-802005-0.00013-6 ↗
12. 10.1111/ics.1279710.1111/ics.12797 ↗
13. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad29210.1093/pnasnexus/pgad292 ↗
14. 10.1039/D5SM00406C10.1039/D5SM00406C ↗
15. 10.1002/app.1979.07023031910.1002/app.1979.070230319 ↗
16. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990725)73:4<553::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990725)73:4<553::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
17. 10.1515/npprj-2020-005210.1515/npprj-2020-0052 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12046510.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120465 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0312410.1021/acs.langmuir.1c03124 ↗
20. 10.1080/15376494.2022.215663810.1080/15376494.2022.2156638 ↗
21. Khoury R. · 2016 · 251
22. 10.1073/pnas.131171811010.1073/pnas.1311718110 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.4203510.1002/app.42035 ↗
24. 10.3390/cosmetics1202007610.3390/cosmetics12020076 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00557.x10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00557.x ↗
26. 10.1111/ics.1265610.1111/ics.12656 ↗
27. 10.1023/A:102088680263210.1023/A:1020886802632 ↗
28. 10.1098/rspa.1909.002110.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11588610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115886 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.10844610.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108446 ↗
31. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11862410.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118624 ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20180851810.1002/adfm.201808518 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10570-023-05353-y10.1007/s10570-023-05353-y ↗
35. 10.3389/fphy.2021.71186010.3389/fphy.2021.711860 ↗
36. 10.1557/PROC-356-54710.1557/PROC-356-547 ↗
37. 10.1002/app.3813210.1002/app.38132 ↗
38. 10.1039/D1SM01343B10.1039/D1SM01343B ↗
39. 10.1017/S095679252300006210.1017/S0956792523000062 ↗
40. 10.1021/ma00097a00910.1021/ma00097a009 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.07.06010.1016/j.polymer.2011.07.060 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c0135610.1021/acs.biomac.2c01356 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0268-005X(00)00020-510.1016/S0268-005X(00)00020-5 ↗
44. Berkey, C.; Mehling, A.; Suckert, A.; Dierker, M.; Riedel, H.; Koch, J.; Guo, Y.; Crotogino, J.; Albers, T.; Dauskardt, R. H. Exploiting Ingredient Interactions to Deliver Optimal Performance of Skin-Care Formulations. In IFSCC ; 2022.
45. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.13505310.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135053 ↗
46. 10.1007/s00253-020-11073-110.1007/s00253-020-11073-1 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11356-013-2103-110.1007/s11356-013-2103-1 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20241309610.1002/adma.202413096 ↗
49. 10.3390/biomedicines909123510.3390/biomedicines9091235 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11779410.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117794 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.11643110.1016/j.foodres.2025.116431 ↗