Molecular Weight Blending of Poly(ethylene succinate) for Enhanced Performance of Solid Polymer Electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) based on biodegradable polyesters present a promising alternative to conventional polymers, yet their ionic conductivity remains a challenge. Herein, we propose a molecular weight blending strategy to fabricate high-performance SPEs using poly(ethylene succinate) (PES). By incorporating low-molecular-weight PES 10k (10 kg·mol –1 ) into a high-molecular-weight PES 104k (104 kg·mol –1 ), we synergistically enhance segmental mobility for ion transport while maintaining mechanical integrity for freestanding membranes. The optimized blend (PES 60 @SPE, 60 wt % PES 104k ) exhibits a significantly improved ionic conductivity of 1.62 × 10 –5 S·cm –1 at 70 °C, a high lithium ion (Li + ) transference number of 0.91, and an extended electrochemical stability window up to 5.3 V vs Li + /Li. These enhancements are attributed to the increased amorphous content and reduced crystallinity confirmed by WAXD and DSC. When assembled into Li//LiFePO 4 full cells, the PES 60 @SPE enables superior rate capability and exceptional cycling stability with 99.0% capacity retention after 100 cycles at 0.1 and 70 °C. Furthermore, molecular weight information analysis reveals that the in situ degradation of PES during cycling, particularly pronounced in the blended system, contributes to long-term performance by dynamically refreshing the electrolyte structure. This work provides a facile and effective molecular weight engineering approach for developing sustainable, high-performance SPEs for solid-state lithium–metal batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of New Energy and Materials
China University of Petroleum
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mser.2018.10.00410.1016/j.mser.2018.10.004 ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20170265710.1002/aenm.201702657 ↗
3. 10.1149/2.0021514jes10.1149/2.0021514jes ↗
4. 10.1039/C9NR05670J10.1039/C9NR05670J ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-019-08767-010.1038/s41467-019-08767-0 ↗
6. 10.1038/451652a10.1038/451652a ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-020-19991-410.1038/s41467-020-19991-4 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20250053110.1002/adfm.202500531 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat482110.1038/nmat4821 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-019-09061-910.1038/s41467-019-09061-9 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0192610.1021/acsomega.2c01926 ↗
12. 10.3389/fenrg.2014.0002510.3389/fenrg.2014.00025 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.10287610.1016/j.ensm.2023.102876 ↗
14. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1519390710.3390/polym15193907 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.00910.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00114-310.1016/S0167-2738(98)00114-3 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5TA03471J10.1039/C5TA03471J ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.02210.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.022 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13634210.1016/j.electacta.2020.136342 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.1c1700210.1021/acsami.1c17002 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20140207310.1002/aenm.201402073 ↗
23. 10.3389/fenrg.2021.72673810.3389/fenrg.2021.726738 ↗
24. 10.1039/C6TA02621D10.1039/C6TA02621D ↗
25. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.02910.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.029 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0836910.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08369 ↗
28. 10.1039/C6CP00757K10.1039/C6CP00757K ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20242116010.1002/adfm.202421160 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10469010.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104690 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.3c1209410.1021/jacs.3c12094 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.01710.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.017 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0917610.1021/acsnano.4c09176 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.partic.2023.04.00210.1016/j.partic.2023.04.002 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23574210.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235742 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10687810.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106878 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.040 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23227110.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232271 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10749910.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107499 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12552710.1016/j.polymer.2022.125527 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.03.02010.1016/j.ensm.2021.03.020 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.08.00510.1016/j.mattod.2021.08.005 ↗
43. 10.3390/nano1323302710.3390/nano13233027 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0452110.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04521 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20200039910.1002/adma.202000399 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10569810.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105698 ↗
47. 10.1002/adma.20240958710.1002/adma.202409587 ↗
48. 10.1002/batt.20200025410.1002/batt.202000254 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.006 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.02810.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.028 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.11693510.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116935 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsami.5c1428710.1021/acsami.5c14287 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.10306610.1016/j.ensm.2023.103066 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16401310.1016/j.cej.2025.164013 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.10017310.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100173 ↗
56. 10.1002/smll.20251348810.1002/smll.202513488 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11296510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.112965 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11106710.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.111067 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0329910.1021/acsaem.1c03299 ↗
60. 10.1002/adfm.20250519710.1002/adfm.202505197 ↗
61. 10.1039/C8TA08875F10.1039/C8TA08875F ↗
62. 10.1002/adma.20230468610.1002/adma.202304686 ↗