journal article·2026-03-13Open access

Visible-Light-Active Starch/Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Metalloporphyrin Films Enable Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Water

Bruna M. Rodrigues, Jaqueline F. de Souza, Paulo R. de Souza, Ricardo B. da Silva, Klaus Krambrock, João F. C. Silva Costa, Bernardo A. Iglesias, André R. Fajardo

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The widespread occurrence of pharmaceutical residues in aquatic environments demands robust, reusable, and solar-activated photocatalytic materials that are capable of operating under mild conditions. In this work, we developed biobased Starch/PVA thin films incorporating meso -tetra(phenyl)porphyrin ( TPP ) and its Zn(II) complex ( ZnTPP ) as heterogeneous photocatalysts for the degradation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ibuprofen (IBU). The porphyrins were immobilized in situ within a citric acid cross-linked Starch/PVA network, yielding hybrid materials with well-defined structural, thermal, and photophysical properties. Comprehensive spectroscopic, thermal, and morphological analyses confirmed the successful incorporation of the porphyrins and revealed distinct polymer–porphyrin interactions, with ZnTPP promoting higher surface roughness and enhanced accessibility to catalytic domains. Under visible-light irradiation, the Starch/PVA/ ZnTPP films exhibited markedly superior photocatalytic activity, achieving up to 93% removal of pharmaceuticals under optimized conditions. Mechanistic studies employing EPR spectroscopy and radical scavengers demonstrated that superoxide radical anion (O 2 •– ) is the predominant reactive oxygen species driving degradation, while swelling, spectroscopic, and topographical analyses correlated catalyst performance with polymer-network hydration and the porphyrin microenvironment. Photocatalytic efficiency was strongly influenced by operational parameters, with optimal activity at neutral pH, intermediate pollutant concentrations, and low catalyst mass. Importantly, the films displayed exceptional operational stability, maintaining their photocatalytic performance over at least 15 consecutive reuse cycles under both artificial white-light and natural sunlight irradiation. Together, these results position the Starch/PVA/ ZnTPP films as a promising, low-cost, and environmentally compatible platform for the visible-light-driven degradation of pharmaceutical contaminants. The combination of renewable polymer matrices, tailored photophysical behavior, and outstanding reusability underscores the potential of this hybrid material as a practical and scalable technology for sustainable water remediation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratório de Bioinorgânica e Materiais Porfirínicos (LBMP), Departamento de Química

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

Departamento de Física

Departmento de Física

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)

Departamento de Química

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Laboratório de Tecnologia e Desenvolvimento de Compósitos e Materiais Poliméricos (LaCoPol)

Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel)

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.10020610.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100206 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.13544410.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135444 ↗
3. 10.3390/hydrobiology202002610.3390/hydrobiology2020026 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.08410.1016/j.cej.2017.03.084 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.11305710.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.113057 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jece.2024.11307310.1016/j.jece.2024.113073 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.14305610.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143056 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.13778410.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.137784 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10843210.1016/j.jece.2022.108432 ↗
10. 10.1039/D4CY00092G10.1039/D4CY00092G ↗
11. 10.1021/ACSOMEGA.5C0254210.1021/ACSOMEGA.5C02542 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.procir.2018.01.00310.1016/j.procir.2018.01.003 ↗
13. 10.3390/ph1704043710.3390/ph17040437 ↗
14. 10.3390/MOLECULES2805209710.3390/MOLECULES28052097 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsomega.5c0191610.1021/acsomega.5c01916 ↗
16. 10.1039/p2984000211110.1039/p29840002111 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.12076810.1016/j.saa.2021.120768 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoso.2024.10137110.1016/j.nanoso.2024.101371 ↗
19. 10.3389/fchem.2018.0037810.3389/fchem.2018.00378 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1386-1425(02)00279-210.1016/S1386-1425(02)00279-2 ↗
21. 10.1021/ic051086610.1021/ic0510866 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.14639210.1016/j.foodchem.2025.146392 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.11762710.1016/j.foodres.2025.117627 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.01810.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.018 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2022.10337810.1016/j.vibspec.2022.103378 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.14326310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143263 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.05410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.054 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.optmat.2023.11452710.1016/j.optmat.2023.114527 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.saa.2024.12467510.1016/j.saa.2024.124675 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.13909810.1016/j.jcis.2025.139098 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.02.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.02.012 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.14057310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140573 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13556010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135560 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13335810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133358 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.10410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.104 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.10085510.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100855 ↗
37. 10.1039/D3RA03927G10.1039/D3RA03927G ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1422493610.3390/polym14224936 ↗
39. 10.1007/s13201-020-1162-y10.1007/s13201-020-1162-y ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12089410.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120894 ↗
41. 10.3390/molecules2815587610.3390/molecules28155876 ↗
42. 10.3390/ma1606248010.3390/ma16062480 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0022-0728(97)00463-410.1016/S0022-0728(97)00463-4 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.08.02110.1016/j.carbpol.2004.08.021 ↗
45. 10.3390/gels704024910.3390/gels7040249 ↗
46. 10.1039/D3RA07825F10.1039/D3RA07825F ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.00410.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.004 ↗
48. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb03322.x10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb03322.x ↗
49. 10.1039/9781849730877-0000110.1039/9781849730877-00001 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0748-5514(86)80071-X10.1016/S0748-5514(86)80071-X ↗
51. 10.1016/S0891-5849(87)80033-310.1016/S0891-5849(87)80033-3 ↗
52. 10.1248/cpb.26.257210.1248/cpb.26.2572 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.12.30310.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.12.303 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41598-025-19788-910.1038/s41598-025-19788-9 ↗
55. 10.1007/s13201-015-0367-y10.1007/s13201-015-0367-y ↗
56. 10.1038/s41598-025-22099-810.1038/s41598-025-22099-8 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0871710.1021/acsomega.3c08717 ↗
58. 10.1021/ie049855110.1021/ie0498551 ↗
59. 10.1039/C9RA07310H10.1039/C9RA07310H ↗
60. 10.1039/D2RA06124D10.1039/D2RA06124D ↗
61. 10.3390/MOLECULES2903061110.3390/MOLECULES29030611 ↗
62. 10.3390/polym1507173810.3390/polym15071738 ↗
63. 10.3762/bjoc.16.8310.3762/bjoc.16.83 ↗
64. 10.1002/ange.20221113210.1002/ange.202211132 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jece.2024.11506510.1016/j.jece.2024.115065 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.01810.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.018 ↗
67. 10.1007/s10924-019-01436-910.1007/s10924-019-01436-9 ↗
68. 10.1039/D3RA07868J10.1039/D3RA07868J ↗