journal article·2014-01

Bulk Density Reduction of Injection Molded Thermoplastic Foams via a Mold Design Approach

Ahmad Zia Ahmadzai, Amir Hossein Behravesh

Cellular Polymers· Volume 33· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigates the inter-relationships amongst processing parameters and mold design and their effects on relative density of injection molded foams. The limitation in lowering the overall bulk density of polymeric foams is one of the main drawbacks in injection foaming process. A sheet mold with a rectangular cavity was designed and manufactured which, includes an overflow channel connected with the main cavity via a secondary gate, the size of which was varied in this research. The effects of three parameters including chemical blowing agent weight percentage, gate width, and part thickness on reduction of relative density were investigated. Full factorial test experiments were applied in this research work. The results were used to determine the optimum conditions in terms of low foam bulk density and high cell density. The results showed that enhanced cell structure can be achieved at a larger part thickness and adjusting the secondary gate to an optimum thickness. The conclusions revealed that part thickness and secondary gate width were the most influential factors on reduction of relative density and part weight.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box: 14115-143, Jalaal-e- Al-e- Ahmad Exp. Way, Tehran, Iran

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. ThroneJ.L. Thermoplastic Foams, p. 465, Sherwood Publishers, Ohio (1996).
2. Osswald T.A. · 2001
3. Klempner D. · 2004
4. Lee S. · 2007
5. 10.1002/pen.2084410.1002/pen.20844 ↗
6. Ahmadi A.A. · Plast. Rubb. Process. Appl. · 1985 · 5 · 35
7. Phannschmidt O. · Proceedings of SPE ANTEC · 1999 · 2100
8. 10.1177/0021955X0404028010.1177/0021955X04040280 ↗
9. Hwang S.S. · Proceedings of SPE ANTEC 2005 · 776
10. 10.1177/02624893060250020210.1177/026248930602500202 ↗
11. 10.1177/0021955X0707904310.1177/0021955X07079043 ↗
12. 10.1177/0021955X0708804410.1177/0021955X07088044 ↗
13. 10.1177/02624893090280060310.1177/026248930902800603 ↗
14. 10.14314/polimery.2009.56410.14314/polimery.2009.564 ↗
15. 10.14314/polimery.2011.23210.14314/polimery.2011.232 ↗
16. 10.1177/02624893060250010110.1177/026248930602500101 ↗
17. 10.1177/02624893040230040110.1177/026248930402300401 ↗
18. 10.1021/bk-1997-0669.ch00810.1021/bk-1997-0669.ch008 ↗
19. Behravesh A.H. · American Chemical Society, Polymer Preprints, Division of Polymer Chemistry. · 1996 · 37 · 767
20. BehraveshA.H., ParkC.B., and VenterR.D., Extrusion of Low-Density Microcellular HIPS Foams Using CO2 In Cellular and Microcellular Materials. 1996; KumarV., and SealerK.A., eds. ASME, New York, pp. 47–64.
21. 10.1002/pen.2156510.1002/pen.21565 ↗
22. Mahmoodi M. · Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2010 · 116 · 334610.1002/app.31839 ↗
23. 10.1177/02624893080270060110.1177/026248930802700601 ↗
24. 10.1177/02624893020210060310.1177/026248930202100603 ↗
25. 10.1177/02624893050240050310.1177/026248930502400503 ↗
26. Chen S.C. · Proceedings of SPE ANTEC 2007 · 699
27. 10.1002/pen.1001310.1002/pen.10013 ↗
28. 10.1080/0360255060061176810.1080/03602550600611768 ↗
29. From Lee J. · Inter. Poly. Proc. · 2011 · 429
30. 10.1002/047178658610.1002/0471786586 ↗