journal article·2022-05-13

Unraveling the Effect of Nondrug Spacers on a True Drug-Polymer and a Comparative Study of Their Antimicrobial Activity

Shaifali Sartaliya, Vijayendran Gowri, Vianni Chopra, Himadri Shekhar Roy, Deepa Ghosh, Govindasamy Jayamurugan

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 4· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Several studies have been conducted on the polymerization of drug units using spacers or other polymeric units. In order to study the importance of spacers in drug-polymers, we designed polymers with and without spacers. As a proof of concept, herein, we present a comparative study on the efficacy of antibacterial activity using a polymeric biocide (PB) C0P1 having no spacer (0%) and two other PBs with varied spacer content (C2P2:29%, C10P3:53%). We considered C0P1 as a potential new type of PB generated from a widely used fluoroquinolone antibiotic, ciprofloxacin 1, by a simple self-condensation activation with thionyl chloride. Monomer 2 (formylated methyl ester of 1) was polymerized with ethylenediamine (C2) and 1,10-diaminodecane (C10) to provide C2P2 and C10P3, respectively. The trend for minimum inhibitory concentration study against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was observed as 1 > C0P1 > C2P2 = C10P3>> 2. Furthermore, after coating on nylon threads, the nonspacer polymer C0P1 showed an enhanced zone of inhibition (ZOI) than monomer 1 as well as the spacer polymers owing to its superior coating ability and sustained drug release capabilities. Thus, this study clearly states that the bioefficacy of a drug-polymer could be retained and enhanced in the absence of nonbioactive spacer units.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial agents and applications · Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, Manauli PO, Mohali, Punjab 140306, India

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization
2. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.02110.1016/j.cell.2020.08.021 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0121410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01214 ↗
4. 10.1039/D0CS01026J10.1039/D0CS01026J ↗
5. 10.1038/s41579-020-0395-y10.1038/s41579-020-0395-y ↗
6. 2001
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Healthcare Safety Network. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event, January 2021. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf.
8. Siegel, J. D.; Rhinehart, E.; Jackson, M.; Chiarello, L. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health-care settings, 2006. www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/mdro/index.html/MDROGuideline2006.pdf (Accessed July 24, 2021).10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.006 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.257.5073.106410.1126/science.257.5073.1064 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c0063510.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00635 ↗
11. 10.1038/nrd220110.1038/nrd2201 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-018-03325-610.1038/s41467-018-03325-6 ↗
13. 10.1038/nature1704210.1038/nature17042 ↗
14. 10.3390/ijms2011274710.3390/ijms20112747 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.06010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.060 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0016310.1021/acs.biomac.0c00163 ↗
17. Hedrick, J. L.; Yang, Y. Y.; Yang, C. Antimicrobial polycarbonates for multidrug resistant bacteria. U. S. Patent US10995177B2, 2021.
18. 10.1039/b509097k10.1039/b509097k ↗
19. 10.1021/am505024p10.1021/am505024p ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.5b0623910.1021/acsami.5b06239 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.6b0074810.1021/acsami.6b00748 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0297010.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02970 ↗
23. 10.1080/15583724.2016.122313110.1080/15583724.2016.1223131 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.005 ↗
25. 10.1039/C8PY00012C10.1039/C8PY00012C ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0045810.1021/acs.biomac.8b00458 ↗
27. 10.1039/c2ra01297a10.1039/c2ra01297a ↗
28. 10.1038/nrmicro144110.1038/nrmicro1441 ↗
29. 10.1002/slct.20180376910.1002/slct.201803769 ↗
30. 10.1128/CMR.2.4.37810.1128/CMR.2.4.378 ↗
31. Drug Information online. See, www.drugs.com
32. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00003-X10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00003-X ↗
33. 10.2147/IJN.S5497110.2147/IJN.S54971 ↗
34. 10.1002/ange.20171303610.1002/ange.201713036 ↗
35. 10.1021/bm049383+10.1021/bm049383+ ↗
36. 10.1016/j.tet.2005.08.03110.1016/j.tet.2005.08.031 ↗
37. 10.1039/C1CC15210F10.1039/C1CC15210F ↗
38. Turos, E.; Anderson, B. E.; Cormier, R. S.; Thomas, J. C.; Kapolka, R. J.; Roma, G. Activity of New N-acylated Ciprofloxacin Derivatives Against Faculative Intracellular Bacteria. US Patent US8143398B1, March 27, 2012.
39. 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2108-2115.200410.1128/AAC.48.6.2108-2115.2004 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11095-017-2250-z10.1007/s11095-017-2250-z ↗
41. 10.1021/bm900410a10.1021/bm900410a ↗
42. 10.1039/C8BM01228H10.1039/C8BM01228H ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.01.05210.1016/j.ejmech.2016.01.052 ↗
44. 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-pwtkb10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-pwtkb ↗
45. 10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.00144110.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.001441 ↗
46. 10.1021/cc800112410.1021/cc8001124 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.02.01210.1016/j.ijggc.2017.02.012 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b0291710.1021/acs.orglett.9b02917 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.03.00110.1016/j.tetlet.2008.03.001 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.6b0016110.1021/acsami.6b00161 ↗
51. 10.1002/pmic.20090033810.1002/pmic.200900338 ↗
52. Gogra A. B. · J. Am. Sci. · 2010 · 6 · 78
53. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.07.05210.1016/j.ejmech.2011.07.052 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14165210.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141652 ↗
55. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03244.x10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03244.x ↗
56. 10.1093/jac/dkm51910.1093/jac/dkm519 ↗
57. 10.1080/14760584.2018.148859010.1080/14760584.2018.1488590 ↗
58. 10.1039/C4OB02110J10.1039/C4OB02110J ↗
59. 10.2165/00003495-198835040-0000310.2165/00003495-198835040-00003 ↗