Deep Learning for Determination of Properties of Semidilute Polymer Solutions
Source abstract
Abstract
The ability to predict polymer solution viscosity is essential for polymer characterization and processing. Here, we use a synergistic approach combining the scaling theory of polymer solutions and convolutional neural network (CNN) models to obtain system-specific parameters and describe semidilute solution viscosity in the unentangled and entangled solution regimes. The scaling approach relies on the existence of a characteristic microscopic length scale─the solution correlation length (correlation blob size) ξ─which uniquely defines macroscopic solution properties. It is based on a relationship between the solution correlation length ξ = lg ν / B and the number of monomers g per correlation volume for polymers with the monomer projection length l . The system-specific set of parameters B g, B th, and 1 in the corresponding solution regime with the scaling exponent ν = 0.588, 0.5, and 1, respectively. Applying two CNN models, we obtained the sets B g and B th from the solution specific viscosity, η sp, as a function of concentration, c, and weight-average degree of polymerization, N w . The CNN was trained on theoretically generated datasets converted to sparse images representing the normalized specific viscosity η sp / N w ( cl 3 ) 1/(3ν–1) in the unentangled Rouse regime. The trained CNN was utilized in automated data analysis of the solution viscosity of polystyrene, poly(ethylene oxide), poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(acrylonitrile- co -itaconic acid), cellulose, sodium hyaluronate, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, cellulose tris(phenyl carbamate), xanthan gum, galactomannan, and sodium κ-carrageenan in water, organic solvents, and ionic liquids. This approach produced values of the B -parameters with mean absolute percentage differences of less than 6% from the corresponding values determined by the manual data analysis. The B -parameters are then used to obtain the packing number P e defining the onset of entanglements in polymer solutions and to describe semidilute solution viscosity as a function of concentration and N w .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Ionic liquids properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3290, United States
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260-1660, United States
Funding
Division of Materials Research
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Pennington, J.; Socher, R.; Manning, C. D. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation; EMNLP, 2014, pp 1532–1543.10.3115/v1/D14-1162 ↗
2. Mikolov, T.; Chen, K.; Corrado, G.; Dean, J. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space, 2013. arXiv:1301.3781. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.
3. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b0047610.1021/acscentsci.9b00476 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0035810.1021/acs.jcim.9b00358 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0291310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02913 ↗
6. Otsuka, S.; Kuwajima, I.; Hosoya, J.; Xu, Y.; Yamazaki, M. In PoLyInfo: Polymer Database for Polymeric Materials Design; 2011 International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies, 7–9 Sept. 2011, 2011; pp 22–29.10.1109/EIDWT.2011.13 ↗
7. 10.29173/istl241810.29173/istl2418 ↗
8. Polymer Property Predictor and Database. https://pppdb.uchicago.edu/.
9. 10.1038/s41578-021-00282-310.1038/s41578-021-00282-3 ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.1c0818110.1021/jacs.1c08181 ↗
11. 10.1039/D2DD00100D10.1039/D2DD00100D ↗
12. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b0022810.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00228 ↗
13. 10.1021/cr200066h10.1021/cr200066h ↗
14. 10.1002/aisy.20220024310.1002/aisy.202200243 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.03410.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.034 ↗
16. 10.1039/D1ME00160D10.1039/D1ME00160D ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.abc621610.1126/sciadv.abc6216 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c0074910.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00749 ↗
19. 10.1021/acscentsci.2c0038210.1021/acscentsci.2c00382 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.9b0802810.1021/jacs.9b08028 ↗
21. 10.1107/S160057672000055210.1107/S1600576720000552 ↗
22. 10.1088/1361-6528/acd25a10.1088/1361-6528/acd25a ↗
23. 10.1039/C9SC03766G10.1039/C9SC03766G ↗
24. 10.1038/s41524-021-00542-410.1038/s41524-021-00542-4 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c0038510.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00385 ↗
26. 10.1021/acspolymersau.2c0005310.1021/acspolymersau.2c00053 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0281010.1021/acs.macromol.0c02810 ↗
28. 10.1021/acspolymersau.1c0002810.1021/acspolymersau.1c00028 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0181410.1021/acsapm.1c01814 ↗
30. Szegedy, C.; Vanhoucke, V.; Ioffe, S.; Shlens, J.; Wojna, Z. Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision, 2015. arXiv:1512.00567. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.00567.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
31. Simonyan, K.; Zisserman, A. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition, 2014. arXiv:1409.1556. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556.
32. 10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
33. 10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.54110.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 ↗
34. 10.1021/ma00233a02310.1021/ma00233a023 ↗
35. 10.1021/ma00077a03610.1021/ma00077a036 ↗
36. 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90294-610.1016/0022-2836(80)90294-6 ↗
37. 10.1021/bm005579810.1021/bm0055798 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0215710.1021/acs.macromol.0c02157 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11588610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115886 ↗
40. 10.1021/ma030204a10.1021/ma030204a ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0117110.1021/acs.macromol.6b01171 ↗
42. 10.1007/BF0070847510.1007/BF00708475 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp804167n10.1021/jp804167n ↗
44. 10.1122/1.499004910.1122/1.4990049 ↗
45. 10.1122/1.355303210.1122/1.3553032 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.12.01410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.12.014 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)80772-710.1016/S0008-6215(00)80772-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/0144-8617(94)90142-210.1016/0144-8617(94)90142-2 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c0284810.1021/acs.jpcb.1c02848 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.01410.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.014 ↗
51. 10.1007/BF0133387810.1007/BF01333878 ↗
52. 10.1002/pol.1976.18014020910.1002/pol.1976.180140209 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00078-910.1016/S0960-8524(98)00078-9 ↗
54. 10.1021/ma000613w10.1021/ma000613w ↗
55. Rubinstein M. · 2007
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.267410.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2674 ↗
57. 10.1021/ma00187a03710.1021/ma00187a037 ↗
58. 10.1021/ma00196a03110.1021/ma00196a031 ↗
59. 10.1021/ma00212a02810.1021/ma00212a028 ↗
60. 10.1021/ma800521g10.1021/ma800521g ↗
61. 10.1021/ma035550710.1021/ma0355507 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c0103110.1021/acs.jcim.1c01031 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.patter.2021.10022510.1016/j.patter.2021.100225 ↗
64. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0745310.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07453 ↗
65. 10.1021/acsestwater.1c0046610.1021/acsestwater.1c00466 ↗
66. Paszke, A.; Gross, S.; Massa, F.; Lerer, A.; Bradbury, J.; Chanan, G.; Killeen, T.; Lin, Z.; Gimelshein, N.; Antiga, L.; Desmaison, A.; Köpf, A.; Yang, E.; DeVito, Z.; Raison, M.; Tejani, A.; Chilamkurthy, S.; Steiner, B.; Fang, L.; Bai, J.; Chintala, S. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library, 2019. arXiv:1912.01703. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01703.
67. Kingma, D. P.; Ba, J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, 2014. arXiv:1412.6980. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.
68. Akiba, T.; Sano, S.; Yanase, T.; Ohta, T.; Koyama, M. Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework, 2019. arXiv:1907.10902. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10902.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
69. 10.1021/jp806893a10.1021/jp806893a ↗
70. 10.1021/ma50004a04210.1021/ma50004a042 ↗
71. 10.1021/ma00144a02410.1021/ma00144a024 ↗
72. 10.1021/ma901404g10.1021/ma901404g ↗
73. 10.1021/ma00076a02810.1021/ma00076a028 ↗
74. 10.1021/ci100050t10.1021/ci100050t ↗