journal article·2025-06-13Open access

Melt Spinning of Thermoplastic Polyurethane-Based Bulk Ionofibers Filled with Carbon Nanotubes

Claude Huniade, Aurélie Cayla, Tariq Bashir, Nils-Krister Persson

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 7· Issue 11

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Ionotronic textiles or i-textiles offer in-air electrochemical applications and sensing due to their ionic character, mimicking phenomena of organisms. To manufacture different i-textiles with unique functions and characteristics, it is necessary to have a range of ionically conductive textile fibers or ionofibers to choose from. However, their means of production are not sufficiently explored to provide knowledge that meets the fabric manufacturing needs. For a textile application, surface functionalization is usually explored as a convenient way to build upon an already known textile material. In contrast, bulk functionalization allows for superior production rate, versatility, and durability. Additionally, the use of the synergy between ionic liquids and carbon nanotubes is seldom explored. Therefore, in this study, melt spinning is investigated regarding the use of an ionic liquid (IL) initially without and ultimately with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for the tailoring of the electrical and mechanical properties of ionofibers. Based on thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) elastomers, IL-containing pellets are prepared using 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate (EMIm OTf) at different weight ratios. About the melt-spun monofilaments, their extrusion temperatures, their morphology through scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray, their fiber conductivity through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry, and their tensile properties are investigated. An optimum of the ratios of IL and CNTs is observed for the melt-spinning process, which results in fiber conductivities within the range of 10 –2 μS cm dtex –1 . Compared to a monofilament melt-spun with no IL and a CNT weight ratio above percolation threshold, the fiber conductivity is twice higher due to its intricate segregated network. Thus, this industrial textile-compatible process offers an alternative within the development of ionotronic fabrics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polymeric E-textiles, The Swedish School of Textiles

University of Borås

University of Lille, ENSAIT, ULR 2461 - GEMTEX - Génie et Matériaux Textiles

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme · Erling-Perssons Stiftelse · EuroEAP Society

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/admt.20210169210.1002/admt.202101692 ↗
2. 10.1002/mame.20240021710.1002/mame.202400217 ↗
3. Cayla A. · 2023 · 1310.1515/9783110670776-002 ↗
4. 10.1039/C7RA02215H10.1039/C7RA02215H ↗
5. 10.1038/s41586-021-03295-810.1038/s41586-021-03295-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.02310.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.023 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.10610.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.106 ↗
8. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.151.4310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.151.43 ↗
9. 10.1002/pen.2172710.1002/pen.21727 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.005 ↗
11. Ferreira A · 2010
12. 10.1177/002199831037890510.1177/0021998310378905 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.01210.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.012 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2012.03.02110.1016/j.synthmet.2012.03.021 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.017 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1102018710.3390/polym11020187 ↗
17. 10.3390/polym1103043510.3390/polym11030435 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.108228910.1126/science.1082289 ↗
19. Fritzsche J. · 2011 · 19310.1533/9780857091390.1.193 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.71310.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.713 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20160597310.1002/adma.201605973 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0189810.1021/acs.iecr.2c01898 ↗
23. Morton W. E. · 2008 · 27410.1533/9781845694425.274 ↗
24. 10.1007/S40037-016-0256-610.1007/S40037-016-0256-6 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.09.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2010.09.014 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.007 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1304059010.3390/polym13040590 ↗
28. Feller J.-F. · 2018 · 24810.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10006-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.02.02210.1016/j.snb.2009.02.022 ↗
30. 10.1002/advs.20230085710.1002/advs.202300857 ↗
31. 10.1002/celc.20210010810.1002/celc.202100108 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12494710.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124947 ↗