journal article·2003-01Open access

Influence of Polyether Copolymer Configuration on Polyurethane Reaction: A Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Wu Suen, Jennifer Percy, Shaw L. Hsu, Igor A. Kaltashov, Howard D. Stidham

Cellular Polymers· Volume 22· Issue 1

Abstract

Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry has been applied to obtain the molecular weight distribution of two polyether copolymers containing ethylene oxide and propylene oxide units. The measured molecular weights and their distributions were surprisingly different from the expected. Based upon the natural isotopic abundance, it was possible to provide a quantitative description of the number of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide units as a function of molecular weight. Important information on composition drift and heterogeneity can be obtained from the 3-D bivariate deconvolution of the mass spectra. As the molecular weight of a random copolymer increased, the ethylene oxide content also increased. A copolymer system with a narrow molecular weight distribution did not necessarily have a narrow composition distribution. These results provide information at the molecular level regarding the hydrophilicity of these copolymers used in polyurethane formulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications · Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polymer Science and Engineering Department and Materials Research Science and Engineering Center

Chemistry Department, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Oertel G. · 1994
2. 10.1002/app.1988.07035030510.1002/app.1988.070350305 ↗
3. ArtaviaL. D., MacoskoC. W., PriesterR. D.Jr., ShrockA. K., and TurnerR. B., in Polyurethanes World Congress, Nice, France, 1991, pp 509.
4. 10.1122/1.55016310.1122/1.550163 ↗
5. Herrington R. · 1997
6. 10.1021/ma951120810.1021/ma9511208 ↗
7. 10.1177/0021955X940300040910.1177/0021955X9403000409 ↗
8. 10.1021/ma00179a05510.1021/ma00179a055 ↗
9. 10.1021/ma00193a01710.1021/ma00193a017 ↗
10. 10.1002/app.1983.07028061810.1002/app.1983.070280618 ↗
11. 10.1177/0021955X810170060410.1177/0021955X8101700604 ↗
12. 10.1177/0021955X810170060210.1177/0021955X8101700602 ↗
13. Tabor R. L. · SPI 34th Ann. Tech/Mark Conf. · 1992 · 514
14. YontzD. J., Ph D Thesis, University of Massachusetts, 1999.
15. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199812)36:17<3065::AID-POLB7>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199812)36:17<3065::AID-POLB7>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
16. 10.1021/ma000454g10.1021/ma000454g ↗
17. 10.1007/978-94-011-2924-410.1007/978-94-011-2924-4 ↗
18. 10.1177/0021955X820180050210.1177/0021955X8201800502 ↗
19. 10.1021/ma961683z10.1021/ma961683z ↗
20. 10.1021/ma961804v10.1021/ma961804v ↗
21. 10.1002/rcm.129007111310.1002/rcm.1290071113 ↗
22. 10.1021/ma952015110.1021/ma9520151 ↗
23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199610)10:13<1668::AID-RCM703>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199610)10:13<1668::AID-RCM703>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
24. 10.1021/ma970710y10.1021/ma970710y ↗
25. 10.1021/ma961314310.1021/ma9613143 ↗
26. 10.1021/ma951639410.1021/ma9516394 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma981594h10.1021/ma981594h ↗
28. 10.1021/ma00117a02810.1021/ma00117a028 ↗
29. 10.1021/ma980821c10.1021/ma980821c ↗
30. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2787(1999)18:5<309::AID-MAS2>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1098-2787(1999)18:5<309::AID-MAS2>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
31. 10.1021/ac971240910.1021/ac9712409 ↗
32. 10.1016/S1044-0305(98)00003-810.1016/S1044-0305(98)00003-8 ↗
33. Peebles L. H. · 1971 · 331
34. CooperA. R., 1989, Determination of Molecular Weight, John Wiley & Sons, 103, pp 520.
35. 10.1021/ja01863a06610.1021/ja01863a066 ↗
36. 10.1021/ma60020a00610.1021/ma60020a006 ↗
37. Schulz G. V. Z. · Physical Chemistry · 1939 · 43 · 25
38. 10.1063/1.174673810.1063/1.1746738 ↗