Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Nanofiber Membranes by Electrospinning: Engineering Features and Cytocompatibility
Source abstract
Abstract
Organic–inorganic (O/I) hybrid fibrous scaffolds represent a cutting-edge attempt for replicating the extracellular matrix (ECM) in tissue engineering. This study introduces an O/I hybrid composed of borosilicate-calcium elements incorporated with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) using an eco-friendly, in situ sol–gel process. The purpose of this research was to electrospin this hybrid composition into nanofibrous mats and investigate the impact of the electrospinning parameters on membrane properties. Critical electrospinning parameters (distance, flow rate, and voltage) were optimized to refine spinning behavior and assess their influence on fiber’s morphology and diameter, being optimal conditions were achieved with a distance of 12 cm, a flow rate between 125 and 150 μL·h –1, and a voltage in the range of 14–17 kV. Based on these conditions, two scaffolds with different fiber diameters (∼65 and 116 nm) were fabricated and compared. A homogeneous distribution of the inorganic phase inside the PCL matrix was successfully achieved, and the presence of hydrogen-bonding interactions between the polymer and the silica network was confirmed. Mechanical properties were improved by the introduction of borosilicate compositions, while the scaffold with the thinnest fibers presented the higher Young’s modulus and tensile strength. Contrary to polymer membrane control, the fibrous O/I hybrid showed a hydrophilic character, with distinct wetting properties depending on fiber diameter. In vitro acellular studies proved superior degradability and bioactivity of the hybrids, confirmed by surface apatite formation, compared with the neat PCL membrane. Higher cell proliferation was exhibited by the hybrids and the best cytocompatibility was favored by the lower fiber diameter. This sustainable, interdisciplinary approach to material design strengthens the development of green, next-generation materials with potential for bionanohybrid applications, particularly for tissue engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CICECO─Materials Institute of Aveiro, Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering
University of Aveiro
LAQV/REQUIMTE, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Manuel Pereira da Silva, 4200-393 Porto, Portugal
Funding
Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.00410.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 ↗
2. 10.1002/admt.20220172310.1002/admt.202201723 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsapm.4c0034410.1021/acsapm.4c00344 ↗
4. 10.3390/jfb302043210.3390/jfb3020432 ↗
5. 10.3390/app1016553010.3390/app10165530 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.11084110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110841 ↗
7. 10.1039/d2tb02089k10.1039/d2tb02089k ↗
8. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0154610.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01546 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.10139610.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101396 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.02.02510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.02.025 ↗
11. 10.1021/la102845k10.1021/la102845k ↗
12. 10.1002/app.4557810.1002/app.45578 ↗
13. 10.1088/2043-6254/aa92b410.1088/2043-6254/aa92b4 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym910048710.3390/polym9100487 ↗
15. 10.1039/D1BM02015C10.1039/D1BM02015C ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.07110.1016/j.msec.2016.03.071 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.02010.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.020 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6RA08339K10.1039/C6RA08339K ↗
19. 10.1155/2013/35181010.1155/2013/351810 ↗
20. 10.1515/bglass-2016-001110.1515/bglass-2016-0011 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0169710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01697 ↗
22. 10.1252/jcej.11we24910.1252/jcej.11we249 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.08510.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.085 ↗
24. 10.3390/nano604007510.3390/nano6040075 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00275-610.1016/S0032-3861(02)00275-6 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.a.3061710.1002/jbm.a.30617 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.03.02010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.03.020 ↗
28. 10.1021/la102845k10.1021/la102845k ↗
29. 10.1002/polb.2049110.1002/polb.20491 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.03.02010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.03.020 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.01010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.010 ↗
32. 10.1023/A:102447502293710.1023/A:1024475022937 ↗
33. 10.1023/A:102026821346710.1023/A:1020268213467 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10971-007-1558-210.1007/s10971-007-1558-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.10602110.1016/j.ejps.2021.106021 ↗
36. 10.1023/A:102073882970710.1023/A:1020738829707 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.13510.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.135 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.08310.1016/j.msec.2016.01.083 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.04.02510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.04.025 ↗
40. 10.1039/b003047n10.1039/b003047n ↗
41. 10.1155/2013/40957210.1155/2013/409572 ↗
42. 10.1163/15685620577457665510.1163/156856205774576655 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.05310.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.053 ↗
44. 10.1023/A:100868561455910.1023/A:1008685614559 ↗
45. 10.1021/cm980353l10.1021/cm980353l ↗
46. 10.1038/s41598-022-13141-010.1038/s41598-022-13141-0 ↗
47. 10.5923/j.ajps.20130304.0210.5923/j.ajps.20130304.02 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0566810.1021/acsanm.3c05668 ↗
49. 10.1023/A:101603280913110.1023/A:1016032809131 ↗
50. 10.1021/jp710797310.1021/jp7107973 ↗
51. 10.1111/jace.1310010.1111/jace.13100 ↗
52. 10.1007/s00339-014-8369-410.1007/s00339-014-8369-4 ↗
53. 10.1021/jp034048l10.1021/jp034048l ↗
54. 10.1023/A:100873351169710.1023/A:1008733511697 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10971-005-2498-310.1007/s10971-005-2498-3 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0022-3093(87)80332-010.1016/S0022-3093(87)80332-0 ↗
57. 10.1016/0022-3093(88)90160-310.1016/0022-3093(88)90160-3 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.03610.1016/j.msec.2008.09.036 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsami.9b0503210.1021/acsami.9b05032 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.02210.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.022 ↗
61. 10.1039/c0jm04502k10.1039/c0jm04502k ↗
62. 10.1002/slct.20170312410.1002/slct.201703124 ↗
63. 10.1177/088391150505746910.1177/0883911505057469 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.12.02310.1016/j.msec.2017.12.023 ↗
65. 10.3390/ijms2020517410.3390/ijms20205174 ↗
66. 10.1021/am401861w10.1021/am401861w ↗
67. 10.1515/bglass-2018-001010.1515/bglass-2018-0010 ↗
68. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10993–5 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 5: Tests for in Vitro Cytotoxicity ; International Standard, 2009.
69. 10.1002/jbm.a.3701210.1002/jbm.a.37012 ↗
70. 10.1021/acsabm.2c0038410.1021/acsabm.2c00384 ↗