journal article·2025-01-10

Transparent and Multifunctional Biocomposites for Sustainable Packaging Applications

Utkarsh Agarwal, Advitiya Kumar, Zheheng Song, Ilya Sychugov, Rajiv K. Srivastava, Lars A. Berglund, Archana Samanta

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 7· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Transparent rigid packaging traditionally relies on fossil fuel-based polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), and polypropylene (PP), which contribute to the production of nonbiodegradable waste, landfills, and environmental pollution. Although they exhibit favorable light transmission, their nonbiodegradability raises significant sustainability concerns. In contrast, cellulosic plant fibers are biodegradable. We aim to utilize biomass waste to produce functional, transparent packaging material, thereby lowering the overall carbon footprint. This study explores transparent high-modulus rigid packaging materials using jute fibers. Transparent jute/thiol–ene composites were developed by using ultraviolet (UV) polymerization techniques, achieving light transmission as high as 80% at 550 nm with a 20% fiber content at 1 mm thickness. These composites showed almost a doubling in tensile modulus compared with commercial PET films. Copper nanoparticles were successfully added to provide antimicrobial properties. Hydrolytic degradation analysis confirmed composite biodegradability and its potential as sustainable solutions for packaging applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Textile and Fiber Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India

Department of Applied Physics, Photonics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Albanova University Centre

Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, Wallenberg Wood Science Center

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Funding

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/agriculture1110099210.3390/agriculture11100992 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.11179210.1016/j.foodres.2022.111792 ↗
3. Kim Y. T. · 2014 · 13
4. 10.1179/2055033215Y.000000000410.1179/2055033215Y.0000000004 ↗
5. 10.1016/0308-8146(82)90004-810.1016/0308-8146(82)90004-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.08210.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.082 ↗
7. 10.3390/recycling801002610.3390/recycling8010026 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11842110.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118421 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0456410.1021/acsomega.2c04564 ↗
10. Shankar S. · 2024 · 5310.1016/B978-0-323-90044-7.00004-5 ↗
11. 10.32604/jrm.2021.01552910.32604/jrm.2021.015529 ↗
12. 10.7603/s40707-013-0012-910.7603/s40707-013-0012-9 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1316274710.3390/polym13162747 ↗
14. Ashby M. · 2009
15. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.03610.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.036 ↗
16. Jahan M. S. · 2022 · 1
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.051 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.9b0469610.1021/acsami.9b04696 ↗
19. 10.56557/jobari/2024/v30i1855110.56557/jobari/2024/v30i18551 ↗
20. 10.1039/C7TA09973H10.1039/C7TA09973H ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.0c1250510.1021/acsami.0c12505 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.10629510.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106295 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.01410.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.014 ↗
24. 10.1002/cssc.20170108910.1002/cssc.201701089 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.11210.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.112 ↗
26. Clsi. M02-A11. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard. www.clsi.org.
27. 10.3390/ijerph1607115410.3390/ijerph16071154 ↗
28. 10.1039/D2GC04185E10.1039/D2GC04185E ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20090392410.1002/anie.200903924 ↗
30. 10.1002/pola.2036610.1002/pola.20366 ↗
31. 10.1039/c1lc20388f10.1039/c1lc20388f ↗
32. Tasci B. · Acta Hortic. · 2016 · 1143 · 13310.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1143.19 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.saa.2011.01.03910.1016/j.saa.2011.01.039 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12043-008-0063-710.1007/s12043-008-0063-7 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.10512910.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.105129 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c2136910.1021/acsami.0c21369 ↗
37. 10.1177/002199830933807810.1177/0021998309338078 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.025 ↗
39. 10.1080/15440478.2017.141051310.1080/15440478.2017.1410513 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.31310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.313 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.00310.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.003 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13852510.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138525 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.scp.2023.10140010.1016/j.scp.2023.101400 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11844810.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118448 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.01310.1016/j.psep.2020.12.013 ↗
46. 10.3390/coatings907043310.3390/coatings9070433 ↗
47. 10.4491/eer.2019.19110.4491/eer.2019.191 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11276110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.112761 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14005110.1016/j.cej.2022.140051 ↗