Transparent and Multifunctional Biocomposites for Sustainable Packaging Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Transparent rigid packaging traditionally relies on fossil fuel-based polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), and polypropylene (PP), which contribute to the production of nonbiodegradable waste, landfills, and environmental pollution. Although they exhibit favorable light transmission, their nonbiodegradability raises significant sustainability concerns. In contrast, cellulosic plant fibers are biodegradable. We aim to utilize biomass waste to produce functional, transparent packaging material, thereby lowering the overall carbon footprint. This study explores transparent high-modulus rigid packaging materials using jute fibers. Transparent jute/thiol–ene composites were developed by using ultraviolet (UV) polymerization techniques, achieving light transmission as high as 80% at 550 nm with a 20% fiber content at 1 mm thickness. These composites showed almost a doubling in tensile modulus compared with commercial PET films. Copper nanoparticles were successfully added to provide antimicrobial properties. Hydrolytic degradation analysis confirmed composite biodegradability and its potential as sustainable solutions for packaging applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile and Fiber Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India
Department of Applied Physics, Photonics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Albanova University Centre
Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, Wallenberg Wood Science Center
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Funding
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/agriculture1110099210.3390/agriculture11100992 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.11179210.1016/j.foodres.2022.111792 ↗
3. Kim Y. T. · 2014 · 13
4. 10.1179/2055033215Y.000000000410.1179/2055033215Y.0000000004 ↗
5. 10.1016/0308-8146(82)90004-810.1016/0308-8146(82)90004-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.08210.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.082 ↗
7. 10.3390/recycling801002610.3390/recycling8010026 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11842110.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118421 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0456410.1021/acsomega.2c04564 ↗
10. Shankar S. · 2024 · 5310.1016/B978-0-323-90044-7.00004-5 ↗
11. 10.32604/jrm.2021.01552910.32604/jrm.2021.015529 ↗
12. 10.7603/s40707-013-0012-910.7603/s40707-013-0012-9 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1316274710.3390/polym13162747 ↗
14. Ashby M. · 2009
15. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.03610.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.036 ↗
16. Jahan M. S. · 2022 · 1
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.051 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.9b0469610.1021/acsami.9b04696 ↗
19. 10.56557/jobari/2024/v30i1855110.56557/jobari/2024/v30i18551 ↗
20. 10.1039/C7TA09973H10.1039/C7TA09973H ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.0c1250510.1021/acsami.0c12505 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.10629510.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106295 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.01410.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.014 ↗
24. 10.1002/cssc.20170108910.1002/cssc.201701089 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.11210.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.112 ↗
26. Clsi. M02-A11. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard. www.clsi.org.
27. 10.3390/ijerph1607115410.3390/ijerph16071154 ↗
28. 10.1039/D2GC04185E10.1039/D2GC04185E ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20090392410.1002/anie.200903924 ↗
30. 10.1002/pola.2036610.1002/pola.20366 ↗
31. 10.1039/c1lc20388f10.1039/c1lc20388f ↗
32. Tasci B. · Acta Hortic. · 2016 · 1143 · 13310.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1143.19 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.saa.2011.01.03910.1016/j.saa.2011.01.039 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12043-008-0063-710.1007/s12043-008-0063-7 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.10512910.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.105129 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c2136910.1021/acsami.0c21369 ↗
37. 10.1177/002199830933807810.1177/0021998309338078 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.025 ↗
39. 10.1080/15440478.2017.141051310.1080/15440478.2017.1410513 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.31310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.313 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.00310.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.003 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13852510.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138525 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.scp.2023.10140010.1016/j.scp.2023.101400 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11844810.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118448 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.01310.1016/j.psep.2020.12.013 ↗
46. 10.3390/coatings907043310.3390/coatings9070433 ↗
47. 10.4491/eer.2019.19110.4491/eer.2019.191 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.11276110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.112761 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14005110.1016/j.cej.2022.140051 ↗