journal article·2024-03-22Open access

Surfmer versus Polymer Effect toward Solubilization and Stabilization of Membrane Proteins

Floriane Mangin, Vinay Chauhan, Pierre Guillet, Marjorie Damian, Marine Soulié, Jean-Louis Banères, Grégory Durand

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 6· Issue 6

Abstract

We have synthesized four acrylamide-based monomers whose polar headgroup consists of one or two glucose or one maltose moieties and whose alkyl chain is made of a n -decyl or a n -octyl hydrophobic chain. These surface-active monomers, called surfmers, were polymerized by free-radical telomerization in the presence of a thiol-based transfer agent, leading to four new nonionic polymers that belong to the class of amphipols. A very good reproducibility and control of the polymerization was noted, leading to average polymerization degrees in perfect agreement with the initial ratio R 0 and to quite a narrow polydispersity index after purification. Surface tension (SFT) measurements indicate that the four surfmers self-assemble at concentrations ranging from ∼0.5 to 4 mM. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments suggest the formation of rather small homogeneous aggregates of 5 nm diameter for the monomers, while the size of the aggregates ranges from 5 to 16 nm diameter for the polymers. The ghrelin receptor GHSR, a typical rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), was used as a challenging model because of its conformational instability in vitro. The surfmers solubilized the receptor from membrane fractions more efficiently than their polymeric counterparts. In contrast, the polymers were significantly more efficient at stabilizing the functional fold of the isolated protein in solution. This demonstrates the opposite effect of surfmers and their polymer counterparts toward the solubilization and stabilization of a fragile membrane protein.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (UMR 5247 UM-CNRS-ENSCM) & Avignon Université, 301 rue Baruch de Spinoza, 84916 Avignon, Cedex 9, France

Equipe Synthèse et Systèmes Colloïdaux Bio-organiques, Unité Propre de Recherche et d’Innovation, Avignon Université, 301 rue Baruch de Spinoza, 84916 Avignon, Cedex 9, France

Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (UMR 5247 UM-CNRS-ENSCM), 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Fondation pour la Recherche M?dicale

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ijms2401046810.3390/ijms24010468 ↗
2. 10.1002/pmic.20080059710.1002/pmic.200800597 ↗
3. 10.1038/nrd219910.1038/nrd2199 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.04.01110.1016/j.bbamem.2004.04.011 ↗
5. 10.1074/jbc.R10003120010.1074/jbc.R100031200 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.01.00710.1016/j.ymeth.2007.01.007 ↗
7. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052208.11405710.1146/annurev.biochem.052208.114057 ↗
8. 10.1042/BST2021018110.1042/BST20210181 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.02.00710.1016/j.chempr.2022.02.007 ↗
10. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-15521910.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155219 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.93.26.1504710.1073/pnas.93.26.15047 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.050375010210.1073/pnas.0503750102 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02627-810.1016/S0014-5793(01)02627-8 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja027051b10.1021/ja027051b ↗
15. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.00710.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.007 ↗
16. 10.1002/bip.2168310.1002/bip.21683 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0092910.1021/acs.biomac.0c00929 ↗
18. 10.1002/1097-0282(2000)56:2<77::AID-BIP1053>3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/1097-0282(2000)56:2<77::AID-BIP1053>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
19. 10.1021/bm900938w10.1021/bm900938w ↗
20. 10.1021/la802305610.1021/la8023056 ↗
21. 10.1021/la205026r10.1021/la205026r ↗
22. 10.1021/bi201862v10.1021/bi201862v ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.01210.1016/j.cell.2017.07.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.18328110.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183281 ↗
25. 10.1042/BST2015028410.1042/BST20150284 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.18344110.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183441 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-0294(96)80095-110.1016/S1359-0294(96)80095-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/0033-0655(92)80022-O10.1016/0033-0655(92)80022-O ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b0087310.1021/acs.joc.9b00873 ↗
30. 10.1021/ma071748610.1021/ma0717486 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2011.05.01510.1016/j.jfluchem.2011.05.015 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-021-26735-510.1038/s41467-021-26735-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mce.2019.11057310.1016/j.mce.2019.110573 ↗
34. 10.1002/9783527621644.ch110.1002/9783527621644.ch1 ↗
35. 10.1002/open.20160004310.1002/open.201600043 ↗
36. 10.3762/bjoc.8.5110.3762/bjoc.8.51 ↗
37. 10.1002/chem.20120006910.1002/chem.201200069 ↗
38. 10.2174/15701780677496452110.2174/157017806774964521 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.02.00210.1016/j.ejmech.2010.02.002 ↗
40. Starks C. M. · 1974
41. 10.1002/pola.2030310.1002/pola.20303 ↗