journal article·2020-09-11

Quantifying Drug Cargo Partitioning in Block Copolymer Micelle Solutions

Xiuli Li, Veera Venkata Shravan Uppala, Tyler J. Cooksey, Megan L. Robertson, Louis A. Madsen

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 2· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Understanding molecular partitioning in solution is crucial for the design of micelle-based formulations. We investigate PEO–PPO–PEO triblock copolymer micelles and their solubilization of three hydrophobic drugs: hydrochlorothiazide, indomethacin, and paclitaxel. Using NMR diffusometry, we quantify the diffusion coefficients of different species in solution, including polymers, drug cargo molecules, and solvent molecules. Polymer concentration and drug chemistry changes cause effects such as increasing partition percentages of hydrochlorothiazide and indomethacin within micelles as the F127 concentration increases from 1 to 5% w/v. This facile methodology enables quantification of drug distribution in micelles without perturbation of the solution, thus opening opportunities to understand broader processes of cargo partitioning.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Block Copolymer Self-Assembly

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, United States

Funding

Division of Chemistry · Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5GC02371H10.1039/C5GC02371H ↗
2. 10.1016/j.nantod.2012.08.00510.1016/j.nantod.2012.08.005 ↗
3. 10.1021/ma970108810.1021/ma9701088 ↗
4. 10.1021/j100098a03010.1021/j100098a030 ↗
5. 10.1021/la00003a01110.1021/la00003a011 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.03.01310.1016/j.jcis.2007.03.013 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2010.04.00210.1016/j.pnmrs.2010.04.002 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja036667d10.1021/ja036667d ↗
9. 10.1021/la010463y10.1021/la010463y ↗
10. 10.1021/js960233h10.1021/js960233h ↗
11. 10.1016/0021-9797(90)90119-910.1016/0021-9797(90)90119-9 ↗
12. 10.1021/ma971721u10.1021/ma971721u ↗
13. 10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00009-310.1016/S0168-3659(02)00009-3 ↗
14. 10.1681/ASN.200706069310.1681/ASN.2007060693 ↗
15. 10.1016/0014-2999(73)90012-510.1016/0014-2999(73)90012-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.07.00310.1016/j.jconrel.2004.07.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.12.01810.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.12.018 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b0002010.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00020 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0939-6411(99)00039-910.1016/S0939-6411(99)00039-9 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20160589210.1002/anie.201605892 ↗
21. 10.1016/0927-7757(94)03044-Z10.1016/0927-7757(94)03044-Z ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.10.02810.1016/j.jcis.2010.10.028 ↗
23. Karger J. · Ann. Phys. · 1971 · 482 · 10710.1002/andp.19714820113 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0122010.1021/acs.macromol.8b01220 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0257910.1021/acs.macromol.6b02579 ↗
26. 10.1002/cmr.a.1009210.1002/cmr.a.10092 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma00130a01610.1021/ma00130a016 ↗
28. 10.1080/02678292.2017.139079210.1080/02678292.2017.1390792 ↗
29. 10.1002/pola.2901510.1002/pola.29015 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.169569010.1063/1.1695690 ↗