Fiber Engineering Trifecta of Spinnability, Morphology, and Properties: Centrifugally Spun versus Electrospun Fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Designing application-ready fibers involves multifaceted challenges related to correlating the formulation properties and processing parameters to the fiber engineering trifecta of spinnability, morphology, and properties. Here, we characterize the influence of macromolecular and solvent properties on the trifecta for poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) fibers produced using a bespoke centrifugal force spinning (CFS) setup and matched processing parameters. We illustrate the influence of changing solvent on spinnability, morphology, and properties (thermal and mechanical) by varying the acetonitrile (AcN) fraction in the spinning dope formulated with PEO dissolved in AcN/H2O mixtures. We contrast the numerical values of measured diameter, tensile strength, elongation-at-break, and crystallinity of centrifugally spun PEO fibers with the published data sets for electrospun fibers using the Berry number (or the overlap parameter) as the ordinate. We compile, analyze, and replot ES and CFS data sets obtained for various solvents, PEO (Mw and c), and processing parameters. Even though distinct forces determine the jet trajectory and fiber formation for ES and CFS, we find that centrifugally spun PEO fibers emulate electrospun fiber properties, morphology, and spinnability. We discuss the mechanism underlying volatile-entangled spinnability, displayed here by PEO solutions in certain AcN/H2O mixtures, in contrast to extensibility-enriched spinnability of multicomponent formulations, enabled by the addition of an ultrahigh Mw polymer fraction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Materials Research (IMO-IMOMEC), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek B-3590, Belgium
IMEC vzw−Division IMOMEC, Wetenschapspark 1, Diepenbeek B-3590, Belgium
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60608, United States
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Gupta V. B. · 199710.1007/978-94-011-5854-1 ↗
2. Ziabicki A. · 1976
3. 10.1002/adma.20040071910.1002/adma.200400719 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0086410.1021/acs.macromol.7b00864 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.06.01510.1016/j.apmt.2019.06.015 ↗
6. 10.1080/15583724.2021.190111510.1080/15583724.2021.1901115 ↗
7. 10.1080/20550324.2017.139391910.1080/20550324.2017.1393919 ↗
8. 10.1385/abab:125:3:14710.1385/abab:125:3:147 ↗
9. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.119710.1089/ten.2006.12.1197 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.0c1241010.1021/acsami.0c12410 ↗
11. Filatov, Y.; Budyka, A.; Kirichenko, V., Electrospinning of Micro-and Nanofibers: Fundamentals in Separation and Filtration Processes. 2007; Vol. 3, p 488.
12. 10.1039/b804128h10.1039/b804128h ↗
13. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0085310.1021/acsapm.0c00853 ↗
14. 10.1039/b809074m10.1039/b809074m ↗
15. Ding B. · 201410.1007/978-3-642-54160-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.08.00210.1016/j.ensm.2018.08.002 ↗
17. 10.3390/molecules2204058510.3390/molecules22040585 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.02610.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.026 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.02910.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.029 ↗
20. 10.1049/mnl.2018.526710.1049/mnl.2018.5267 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.02810.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.028 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.02310.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/0032-3861(90)90246-u10.1016/0032-3861(90)90246-u ↗
24. 10.1021/ma201263z10.1021/ma201263z ↗
25. 10.1063/1.219046910.1063/1.2190469 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00397-010-0500-710.1007/s00397-010-0500-7 ↗
27. 10.1039/c4sm01661k10.1039/c4sm01661k ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.05010.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.050 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b0039310.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00393 ↗
30. 10.1002/polb.2438810.1002/polb.24388 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.182027711610.1073/pnas.1820277116 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0007610.1021/acs.macromol.0c00076 ↗
33. 10.1039/d1sm00335f10.1039/d1sm00335f ↗
34. 10.1039/c6ra16986d10.1039/c6ra16986d ↗
35. 10.1016/s1369-7021(10)70199-110.1016/s1369-7021(10)70199-1 ↗
36. 10.1021/nl101355x10.1021/nl101355x ↗
37. 10.1080/15583724.2014.93585810.1080/15583724.2014.935858 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c0045610.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00456 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.04.01210.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.04.012 ↗
40. 10.1002/anie.20025080010.1002/anie.200250800 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.00910.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.009 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.03710.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.037 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.476988610.1063/1.4769886 ↗
44. 10.1017/jfm.2020.19610.1017/jfm.2020.196 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0029210.1021/acs.macromol.5b00292 ↗
46. 10.1021/ma035689h10.1021/ma035689h ↗
47. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.02110.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.021 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.01110.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.011 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.02.05210.1016/j.polymer.2010.02.052 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.04710.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.047 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.05.00110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.05.001 ↗
52. 10.3390/ijms1711179010.3390/ijms17111790 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.00610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.006 ↗
54. 10.1021/bm300407q10.1021/bm300407q ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0068710.1021/acs.macromol.7b00687 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.01.01010.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.01.010 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.00210.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.002 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.04510.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.045 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.mseb.2020.11502410.1016/j.mseb.2020.115024 ↗
60. 10.1021/nl080124q10.1021/nl080124q ↗
61. 10.3390/polym1203057510.3390/polym12030575 ↗
62. 10.1002/pol.2021042410.1002/pol.20210424 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0179910.1021/acs.macromol.1c01799 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0216410.1021/acs.macromol.1c02164 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.493639110.1063/1.4936391 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.366201510.1063/1.3662015 ↗
67. 10.1002/adem.20210015310.1002/adem.202100153 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.msec.2012.11.03010.1016/j.msec.2012.11.030 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.01510.1016/j.renene.2012.09.015 ↗
70. 10.1021/ma402627j10.1021/ma402627j ↗
71. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.10043910.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100439 ↗
72. 10.3390/polym1109138410.3390/polym11091384 ↗
73. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0087310.1021/acsapm.0c00873 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.01710.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.017 ↗
75. 10.1039/c6lc01155a10.1039/c6lc01155a ↗
76. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0007710.1021/acs.macromol.0c00077 ↗
77. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0014810.1021/acs.macromol.8b00148 ↗
78. 10.1063/1.512825410.1063/1.5128254 ↗
79. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0275110.1021/acs.macromol.0c02751 ↗
80. 10.1039/d0sm02248a10.1039/d0sm02248a ↗
81. 10.1002/app.3642010.1002/app.36420 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.09.01710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.09.017 ↗
83. Rubinstein M. · 200310.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.0001 ↗
84. 10.1039/b808479c10.1039/b808479c ↗
85. McKinley G. H. · Rheol. Rev. · 2005 · 1
86. Yarin A. L. · 1993
87. 10.1002/polb.2359610.1002/polb.23596 ↗
88. Wu Q. · 2018
89. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.010 ↗
90. 10.3390/pr712094810.3390/pr7120948 ↗
91. 10.1002/app.5000110.1002/app.50001 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.01.01310.1016/j.ejpb.2019.01.013 ↗
93. 10.1021/ma061735c10.1021/ma061735c ↗
94. Grothe, T.; Brikmann, J.; Ehrmann, A. In PEO as spinnable polymer and spinning-agent for non-spinnable materials.Proceedings of Aachen–Dresden–Denkendorf International Textile Conference; Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, 2016.
95. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.19510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.195 ↗
96. 10.3390/polym1206140310.3390/polym12061403 ↗
97. 10.1177/004051751454296910.1177/0040517514542969 ↗
98. 10.1002/pen.2475410.1002/pen.24754 ↗
99. 10.1063/1.511096510.1063/1.5110965 ↗
100. 10.3390/polym1110155010.3390/polym11101550 ↗