journal article·2020-05-08

Liquid-Phase Applications of Metal–Organic Framework Mixed-Matrix Membranes Prepared from Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate)

Jessica C. Moreton, Joseph M. Palomba, Seth M. Cohen

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 2· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) composed of a metal–organic framework (MOF, UiO-66) and a poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) copolymer were synthesized with a range of MOF loadings. The MOF pores in these MMMs are accessible by gas sorption measurements and susceptible to postsynthetic modification and exchange. In addition, the MMMs were tested for their utility in three potential aqueous applications: dye separation, sorption and removal of perfluoroalkanes, and catalytic breakdown of a chemical warfare agent simulant. These studies also show that choice of polymer binder for the MMM affects the composite performance, despite it being a minority component of these MOF-dominant MMM composites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States

Funding

Defense Threat Reduction Agency · Division of Materials Research · National Defense Education Program · USD/R&E · Basic Research in the Science Mathematics and Research for Transformation Scholarship Program

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
2. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.1810.1038/natrevmats.2015.18 ↗
3. 10.1039/C5CS00307E10.1039/C5CS00307E ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.7b1303710.1021/acsami.7b13037 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.7b1936510.1021/acsami.7b19365 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20150407710.1002/anie.201504077 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.9b0278910.1021/jacs.9b02789 ↗
8. 10.1039/C6CC07329H10.1039/C6CC07329H ↗
9. 10.1039/C5SC04368A10.1039/C5SC04368A ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20180156310.1002/smll.201801563 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20180843310.1002/anie.201808433 ↗
12. 10.1039/C7TA07294E10.1039/C7TA07294E ↗
13. 10.1039/C7SC04152G10.1039/C7SC04152G ↗
14. 10.1080/0002889680934298110.1080/00028896809342981 ↗
15. Jones, G. D.; Assink, R. A.; Dargaville, T. R.; Chaplya, P. M.; Clough, R. L.; Elliott, J. M.; Martin, J. W.; Mowery, D. M.; Celina, M. C. Characterization, performance and optimization of PVDF as a piezoelectric film for advanced space mirror concepts, Sandia National Laboratories, 2005.10.2172/876343 ↗
16. 10.1093/toxsci/kfm12810.1093/toxsci/kfm128 ↗
17. 10.1039/C9CC02252J10.1039/C9CC02252J ↗
18. 10.1039/C8CC03255F10.1039/C8CC03255F ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20181265510.1002/anie.201812655 ↗
20. Rouquerol, J.; Llewellyn, P.; Rouquerol, F. Is the BET Equation Applicable to Microporous Adsorbents?; Elsevier: 2007; Vol. 160, pp 49–56.10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80008-5 ↗
21. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0557210.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05572 ↗
22. Whelan A. · 199410.1007/978-94-011-1292-5 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja805795310.1021/ja8057953 ↗
24. 10.1039/C1SC00394A10.1039/C1SC00394A ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0473410.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04734 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b0026010.1021/acs.estlett.6b00260 ↗
27. 10.1289/ehp.130661510.1289/ehp.1306615 ↗
28. 10.1001/jama.2011.203410.1001/jama.2011.2034 ↗
29. 10.1039/C8NJ03312A10.1039/C8NJ03312A ↗
30. 10.1002/smll.20197005410.1002/smll.201970054 ↗