journal article·2026-02-13

Xolography for Volumetric 3D Printing of Thermoplastic Materials: Understanding of the Correlation between Solubility and Resolution

Emile Goldbach, Lucile Halbardier, Maxime Michelas, Nathaniel Corrigan, Céline Croutxé-Barghorn, Cyrille Boyer, Xavier Allonas

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 8· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigates the volumetric 3D printing of thermoplastic materials using xolography. Employing the Hoftyzer and Van Krevelen model to estimate solubility parameters, we explored various factors influencing the printing process, including resin viscosity and polarity, and polymer solubility in the resins. Three strategies were implemented to increase printing resolution in xolography by increasing the resin viscosity, enhancing the resin polarity, and incorporating monomers with strong hydrogen-bonding capabilities. These strategies promoted polymer precipitation at lower monomer conversions, enabling the fabrication of high-resolution thermoplastic 3D structures via xolography. Importantly, the printed materials demonstrated solubility in selected solvents, highlighting their potential for further processing or recycling.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Macromolecular Photochemistry and Engineering, Université de Haute Alsace, 3b rue Alfred Werner, Mulhouse 68093, France

Centre for Advanced Macromolecular Design (CAMD) and Australian Centre for NanoMedicine (ACN), School of Chemical Engineering

UNSW Sydney

Centre for Advanced Manufacturing Technology (CfAMT), School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment

Western Sydney University

Funding

Australian Research Council

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20180529010.1002/adfm.201805290 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20190385010.1002/adma.201903850 ↗
3. 10.1039/D1GC01489G10.1039/D1GC01489G ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10242310.1016/j.addma.2021.102423 ↗
5. Hull, C. W. Apparatus for Production of Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. US4575330A, 1986.
6. Shkolnik, A.; John, H.; El-Siblani, A. Process for the Production of a Three-Dimensional Object with Resolution Improvement by “Pixel-Shift.”. US7790093B2, 2010.
7. 10.1364/PRJ.45333810.1364/PRJ.453338 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aaa239710.1126/science.aaa2397 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.aau711410.1126/science.aau7114 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.10175510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.101755 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41586-020-3029-710.1038/s41586-020-3029-7 ↗
12. 10.1002/admt.20240016210.1002/admt.202400162 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20230671610.1002/adma.202306716 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20240235610.1002/smll.202402356 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20190397010.1002/adma.201903970 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20200717310.1002/adfm.202007173 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11233510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112335 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.1c0251310.1021/acsami.1c02513 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10226810.1016/j.addma.2021.102268 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.1c0887210.1021/acsami.1c08872 ↗
21. 10.1002/marc.20240026810.1002/marc.202400268 ↗
22. 10.1021/i360029a00210.1021/i360029a002 ↗
23. 10.1021/cr60137a00310.1021/cr60137a003 ↗
25. 10.1002/smsc.20240001910.1002/smsc.202400019 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20201652310.1002/anie.202016523 ↗