Cotton Fabric Coated with Silver/Carbon Nanotubes and Iron Oxide/Chitosan-Modified Polyurethane for Enhanced Electromagnetic Shielding
Source abstract
Abstract
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials based on conventional polymer composites raised environmental concerns due to their nondegradability. Therefore, the development of environmentally friendly materials for EMI shielding applications is in great demand. In this work, biomass cotton fabric served as the skeleton, and silver nanoparticles (Ag)/carbon nanotubes (CNTs) conductive networks and a chitosan-blocked biodegradable polyurethane (CPU)/Fe 3 O 4 layer were formed on the surface of the cotton fabric through silver-plating and dip-coating methods. The Fe 3 O 4 /CPU surface layer enhanced the impedance matching at the sample–air interface and EM absorption ability through interior magnetic loss, while the synergistic Ag/CNTs conductive networks in the middle layer contributed to the multiple reflections and scattering of EM waves. As a result, the Fe 3 O 4 /CPU/Ag/CNTs coated cotton fabric achieved an impressive EMI shielding effectiveness of >73.77 dB over the X-band frequency range with an absorption coefficient of 0.24. Furthermore, the composite fabric also exhibited highly reliable EMI shielding ability during the bending, washing, and acid/alkali treatment tests. Consequently, the fabricated fabric will benefit the development of ecofriendly and sustainable EMI shielding materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Textiles and Clothing
Qingdao University
Qingdao Fiber Textile Inspection Institute
Funding
Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40820-023-01246-810.1007/s40820-023-01246-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2024.10161710.1016/j.mtphys.2024.101617 ↗
3. 10.1039/D3TA07181B10.1039/D3TA07181B ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20231068310.1002/adma.202310683 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.00810.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.008 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.adp658110.1126/science.adp6581 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20231585110.1002/adfm.202315851 ↗
8. 10.3390/molecules2822764710.3390/molecules28227647 ↗
9. 10.1002/smll.20240293810.1002/smll.202402938 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1509210110.3390/polym15092101 ↗
11. 10.1007/s40820-023-01218-y10.1007/s40820-023-01218-y ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2025.12009310.1016/j.carbon.2025.120093 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1515323510.3390/polym15153235 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0046210.1021/acsanm.4c00462 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.4c1118910.1021/acsami.4c11189 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2792810.1002/pc.27928 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0240110.1021/acsnano.0c02401 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13558710.1016/j.cej.2022.135587 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.10410.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.104 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11048910.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110489 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.08.02210.1016/j.jmst.2024.08.022 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10665210.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106652 ↗
23. 10.3390/molecules2815562810.3390/molecules28155628 ↗
24. 10.1007/s40820-024-01496-010.1007/s40820-024-01496-0 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20231442510.1002/adfm.202314425 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11006810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110068 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11356-020-09389-610.1007/s11356-020-09389-6 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11814-022-1289-710.1007/s11814-022-1289-7 ↗
29. 10.5254/rct.16.8481710.5254/rct.16.84817 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.00610.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.02910.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.029 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20230714810.1002/smll.202307148 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10837110.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108371 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11616610.1016/j.mseb.2022.116166 ↗