Facile Solvent Treatment of PEDOT:PSS toward High Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Effectiveness
Source abstract
Abstract
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials combining high flexibility, exceptional electrical conductivity, lightweight properties, and superior shielding performance remain crucial for modern microelectronic applications. This study presents a secondary doping approach employing dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid (DBSA) and concentrated sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) to engineer highly conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) films. While DBSA treatment induced gelation of the PEDOT:PSS matrix and achieved a 6-fold lower conductivity compared to H 2 SO 4 -treated samples (reaching 63.6 dB), it yielded exceptional EMI shielding performance with a remarkable specific shielding effectiveness of 12,960 dB cm 2 g –1 . This outstanding performance was attributed to the synergistic interplay between the development of a layered architecture within the film and the significant enhancement in film thickness. Furthermore, the PEDOT:PSS/DBSA films demonstrated exceptional environmental stability, maintaining shielding effectiveness above 60 dB under harsh conditions, a performance benchmark meeting stringent military-grade requirements. This study underscores the critical balance between conductivity and microstructure attributes in governing shielding performance and presents a promising avenue for the development of highly efficient, flexible EMI shielding materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Dielectric materials and actuators · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangzhou Liby Group Co., Ltd.
School of Materials and Energy
Foshan University
Department of Polymeric Materials and Engineering, School of Materials and Energy
Guangdong University of Technology
Guangdong Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy Laboratory (Guangzhou)
Funding
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province · Pazhou Lab
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aag242110.1126/science.aag2421 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20170236710.1002/adma.201702367 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0364110.1021/acsomega.9b03641 ↗
4. 10.1186/cc611510.1186/cc6115 ↗
5. 10.1039/C8TC04795B10.1039/C8TC04795B ↗
6. 10.1007/s10853-020-05635-x10.1007/s10853-020-05635-x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.10120410.1016/j.nantod.2021.101204 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20210625310.1002/adma.202106253 ↗
9. Kondawar, S. B.; Modak, P. R. Materials for Potential EMI Shielding Applications; Elsevier: New York, 2020; pp 9–25.10.1016/B978-0-12-817590-3.00002-6 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.8b2167110.1021/acsami.8b21671 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10965210.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109652 ↗
12. 10.1007/s40820-023-01203-510.1007/s40820-023-01203-5 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0250410.1021/acsomega.2c02504 ↗
14. Liu, L. F.; Zhang, Q. S. Analysis of Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of metal material, 2nd International Conference on Advanced Engineering Materials and Technology (AEMT), Zhuhai, PEOPLES R CHINA, Jul 06–08; Trans Tech Publications Ltd: Zhuhai, PEOPLES R CHINA, 2012; pp 655–659.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.538-541.655 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20110230610.1002/adma.201102306 ↗
16. 10.1007/s12274-024-6486-810.1007/s12274-024-6486-8 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20190676910.1002/adma.201906769 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2024.11759110.1016/j.synthmet.2024.117591 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfin.2025.10576110.1016/j.surfin.2025.105761 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.08010.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.080 ↗
21. 10.1002/adhm.20210006110.1002/adhm.202100061 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.03310.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.033 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12034510.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120345 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12953310.1016/j.cej.2021.129533 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20231518810.1002/adfm.202315188 ↗
26. 10.1039/C6TC01619G10.1039/C6TC01619G ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.7b0101710.1021/acsami.7b01017 ↗
28. 10.1007/s40843-020-1557-310.1007/s40843-020-1557-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12692210.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126922 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.8b1834710.1021/acsami.8b18347 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jiec.2021.05.01910.1016/j.jiec.2021.05.019 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20240540010.1002/smll.202405400 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20130461110.1002/adma.201304611 ↗
34. 10.1002/admi.20200064110.1002/admi.202000641 ↗
35. 10.1002/aelm.20180080410.1002/aelm.201800804 ↗
36. 10.1126/sciadv.abj166310.1126/sciadv.abj1663 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20160331310.1002/adma.201603313 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20190475210.1002/adma.201904752 ↗
39. 10.1039/C4TC01593B10.1039/C4TC01593B ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0074010.1021/acs.macromol.6b00740 ↗
41. 10.1142/S025676790500006010.1142/S0256767905000060 ↗
42. 10.1088/1361-6528/abd1a910.1088/1361-6528/abd1a9 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.12.05710.1016/j.orgel.2016.12.057 ↗
44. 10.1038/srep4507910.1038/srep45079 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20200457910.1002/adma.202004579 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.10640510.1103/PhysRevLett.109.106405 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41428-023-00784-710.1038/s41428-023-00784-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11810410.1016/j.carbon.2023.118104 ↗
49. 10.1109/15.329710.1109/15.3297 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.09.01210.1016/j.matt.2022.09.012 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20210990410.1002/adma.202109904 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13079510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130795 ↗
53. 10.1002/adma.20231068310.1002/adma.202310683 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.00310.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.003 ↗
55. 10.1002/adfm.20200088310.1002/adfm.202000883 ↗
56. 10.1039/C5TC00525F10.1039/C5TC00525F ↗
57. 10.1021/acsami.1c1330310.1021/acsami.1c13303 ↗
58. 10.1002/admi.20190135310.1002/admi.201901353 ↗
59. 10.1039/D3TA01021J10.1039/D3TA01021J ↗
60. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0027810.1021/acsanm.1c00278 ↗
61. 10.1021/jp972010110.1021/jp9720101 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsami.9b0732510.1021/acsami.9b07325 ↗