journal article·2025-07-25Open access

Origins of Electromechanical Behavior in Surface-Localized Nanocomposites: Insights into Crack Network Dynamics and Particle Network Rearrangements

Emily A. Ryan, Natalie E. Raia, John R. Reynolds, Meisha L. Shofner

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 7· Issue 14

Abstract

There is a critical need for new technologies to support lunar and Martian exploration efforts, particularly for flexible, durable, and environmentally stable materials that can weather challenging space conditions. Electrically conductive thin films are critical for numerous applications, including structural health monitoring, charge dissipation, micrometeoroid and orbital debris impact detection, and electrodynamic dust shielding. Surface-localized nanocomposites (SLNCs) offer a promising alternative to metallic and ceramic films as flexible, durable, thin film conductors. This study examines the electromechanical properties in tension and bending of SLNCs produced via melt infiltration with chemically modified reduced graphene oxide (CMrGO) as the conductive component with three polymer materials which serve as both the substrate and the composite matrix in the SLNC: olefin block copolymer (OBC), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and poly-(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF). Monotonic electromechanical tensile testing revealed a substrate independent, linear piezoresistive response in the elastic regime and highly substrate dependent nonlinear piezoresistive response beyond yield. Substrate ductility strongly affected the measurable gauge factor (GF) in these systems, with OBC and HDPE SLNCs having GFs of 20-100, compared to only 2 for PVDF. Static bending tests showed small changes in resistance even at sharp bending radii. The low GF in the elastic regime and at sharp bending radii is beneficial for both active and passive electronic applications for inflatable structures, drapeable covers, and flexible robotics. In situ microscopy during uniaxial tensile deformation identified crack network development as a key mechanism contributing to the nonlinear piezoresistive response after yield. Optical profilometry revealed the formation of partial thickness cracks at low strains which grew deeper and wider with increasing strain. Finally, cyclic testing indicated that in addition to crack formation and closure, particle network rearrangement associated with matrix relaxation plays a significant role in the piezoresistive response, particularly in the elastic regime.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering

Georgia Institute of Technology

School of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Funding

Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems · Georgia Tech Foundation · National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/app.5522510.1002/app.55225 ↗
2. Kessler, P.; Prater, T.; Nickens, T.; Harris, D. Artemis deep space habitation: enabling a sustained human presence on the Moon and beyond. In 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO); IEEE: Big Sky, MT, 2022, pp 01–12.10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843393 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41526-024-00363-x10.1038/s41526-024-00363-x ↗
4. Palmieri, P.; Gaidano, M.; Troise, M.; Salamina, L.; Ruggeri, A.; Mauro, S. A deployable and inflatable robotic arm concept for aerospace applications. In 2021 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace); IEEE, 2021, pp 453–458.10.1109/MetroAeroSpace51421.2021.9511654 ↗
5. Cadogan, D.; Scheir, C.; Dixit, A.; Ware, J.; Cooper, E.; Kopf, P. Intelligent flexible materials for deployable space structures (InFlex). In 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 14th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, 7th, 2006.10.2514/6.2006-1897 ↗
6. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab98eb10.1088/1361-665X/ab98eb ↗
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/08501610.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085016 ↗
8. 10.1002/2017SW00168910.1002/2017SW001689 ↗
9. 10.1002/admt.20200002810.1002/admt.202000028 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.07.00310.1016/j.actaastro.2023.07.003 ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-6501/acd13510.1088/1361-6501/acd135 ↗
12. Finckenor, M. M.; de Groh, K. K. Space enviromental effects The International Space Station (ISS) Researcher’s Guide; NASA, 2015. https://www.nasa.gov/science-research/for-researchers/a-researchers-guide-to-space-environmental-effects/.
13. Finckenor M. M. · 2018 · 255 · 40310.2514/5.9781624104893.0403.0434 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.4c1112610.1021/acsami.4c11126 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11340-019-00534-y10.1007/s11340-019-00534-y ↗
16. Wei-Quan F. · 2013 · 32 · 18710.1007/978-3-642-30229-9_17 ↗
17. de Groh K. K. · 2013 · 32 · 1310.1007/978-3-642-30229-9_2 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.281723410.1063/1.2817234 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.156568310.1063/1.1565683 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20160071310.1002/adfm.201600713 ↗
21. 10.1002/smll.20210787910.1002/smll.202107879 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.04.06010.1016/j.carbon.2020.04.060 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.10064210.1016/j.mtla.2020.100642 ↗
24. 10.1088/2058-8585/aca98a10.1088/2058-8585/aca98a ↗
25. 10.1088/2058-8585/ac414c10.1088/2058-8585/ac414c ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0402510.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04025 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20130474210.1002/adma.201304742 ↗
28. 10.1002/smll.20150267010.1002/smll.201502670 ↗
29. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng101220-09383610.1146/annurev-chembioeng101220-093836 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0058810.1021/acsapm.3c00588 ↗
31. 10.1002/admi.20200142110.1002/admi.202001421 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0253910.1021/acsanm.0c02539 ↗
33. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM D638-14: West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.
34. 10.1002/adma.20200315510.1002/adma.202003155 ↗
35. 10.1021/nl302959a10.1021/nl302959a ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-019-41989-210.1038/s41598-019-41989-2 ↗
37. 10.1116/6.000236210.1116/6.0002362 ↗
38. 10.1002/admi.20190003410.1002/admi.201900034 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.12347810.1063/1.123478 ↗
40. 10.3390/ma1215249010.3390/ma12152490 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.tsf.2023.13992010.1016/j.tsf.2023.139920 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.498280210.1063/1.4982802 ↗
43. 10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60210-310.1016/S1672-2515(07)60210-3 ↗
44. 10.1088/2058-8585/ac124310.1088/2058-8585/ac1243 ↗
45. 10.1039/D0TC04346J10.1039/D0TC04346J ↗
46. 10.1007/s11661-009-9988-910.1007/s11661-009-9988-9 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.00610.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.006 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10853-012-6620-y10.1007/s10853-012-6620-y ↗
49. Hyatt, M.; Greenberg, P.; Pines, V.; Chait, A.; Farrell, W.; Stubbs, T.; Feighery, J. Lunar and Martian dust: evaluation and mitigation. In 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2007.10.2514/6.2007-347 ↗