Furfural-Based Vinyl Ester Resins: Syntheses, Properties and Comparison to Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate-Based Vinyl Ester Resin
Source abstract
Abstract
The environmental impact of using fossil-based resources in polymer production has raised serious concerns in recent decades. As a response, the development of renewable alternatives has garnered significant interest. In this study, we report the syntheses of two renewable sulfur-bridged dimethacrylates via three-step routes starting from commercial 5-bromofurfural. The dialdehyde and aldehyde intermediates were obtained using sodium sulfide and 2-mercaptoethanol, respectively, followed by reduction to diols and subsequent methacrylation using methacrylic anhydride (MAA). The properties of the resulting biobased dimethacrylates were compared to those of a commercially available petroleum-based vinyl ester resin and its neat monomer, bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (BisGMA). The difuran-based monomer was a waxy solid at room temperature but exhibited low viscosity in its liquid state at elevated temperature, while the unsymmetrical monomer, containing a single furan ring, showed low viscosity already at room temperature – highlighting their favorable processing characteristics. Upon curing, both bioresins formed highly cross-linked networks with outstanding glass transition temperatures (183 and 162 °C), while thermal decomposition took place at 251 and 285 °C. Tensile strengths were approximately 46 and 16 MPa. Furthermore, both materials demonstrated chemical and water resistance comparable to that of their fossil-based counterpart. The results support the potential of these dimethacrylates as renewable alternatives to widely utilized fossil-based vinyl ester resins in various applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Unit of Sustainable Chemistry
University of Oulu
Funding
Business Finland · Opetus- ja Kulttuuriministeri?
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.11020910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110209 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14265910.1016/j.cej.2023.142659 ↗
3. 10.3390/molecules2624766310.3390/molecules26247663 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.00210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00043-X10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00043-X ↗
6. 10.1039/C5RA03254G10.1039/C5RA03254G ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.dental.2020.02.00510.1016/j.dental.2020.02.005 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x ↗
10. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0607410.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06074 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.09.01010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.09.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.11.01010.1016/j.wasman.2022.11.010 ↗
13. Vinyl Ester Resin (VER) Market Size, Share. Analysis Reports, 2030. https://www.chemanalyst.com/industry-report/vinyl-ester-resin-ver-market-661 (accessed 2025–03–13).
14. 10.1002/app.4381710.1002/app.43817 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.11347910.1016/j.enpol.2023.113479 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.01210.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.012 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.00210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.rser.2024.11523410.1016/j.rser.2024.115234 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.10648210.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106482 ↗
20. 10.1039/D4GC00883A10.1039/D4GC00883A ↗
21. 10.1016/B978-1-4557-3107-7.00005-110.1016/B978-1-4557-3107-7.00005-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00004-X10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00004-X ↗
23. Furfural Market - Size, Share & Industry Analysis. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/furfural-market (accessed 2025–03–13).
24. Furfural global market volume 2030. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1310459/furfural-market-volume-worldwide/ (accessed 2025–03–13).
25. 10.1002/pol.2023007410.1002/pol.20230074 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.09.01510.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.09.015 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.3795910.1002/app.37959 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0220710.1021/acsapm.3c02207 ↗
29. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0558810.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05588 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0036710.1021/acsapm.0c00367 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c0009710.1021/acs.biomac.2c00097 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.macromol.4c0100010.1021/acs.macromol.4c01000 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c0134210.1021/acs.macromol.3c01342 ↗
34. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics; ASTM D638–22; West Conshohocken, PA, 2022.
35. 10.1039/p1985000128510.1039/p19850001285 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00094-710.1016/S0142-9612(02)00094-7 ↗
37. 10.1002/pi.554210.1002/pi.5542 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.07.01410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.07.014 ↗
39. 10.1039/D2PY00598K10.1039/D2PY00598K ↗
40. 10.1002/macp.1969.02121011810.1002/macp.1969.021210118 ↗
41. 10.1039/C5PY00553A10.1039/C5PY00553A ↗
42. Arhangel‘skii I. V. · 2013
43. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.28310.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.283 ↗
44. 10.1016/B978-0-323-47357-6.00021-010.1016/B978-0-323-47357-6.00021-0 ↗
45. 10.1039/c3ta12918g10.1039/c3ta12918g ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0290110.1021/acs.iecr.7b02901 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0245710.1021/acs.macromol.7b02457 ↗
48. Lange N. A. · 2005
49. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14265910.1016/j.cej.2023.142659 ↗
50. Foreman J.
51. Whitcomb K.
52. 10.1002/app.2240010.1002/app.22400 ↗