High Tg Poly(ester-co-vinyl)s with Compositional Homogeneity by Radical Ring-Opening Polymerization
Source abstract
Abstract
The synthesis of polyesters by radical ring-opening polymerization (RROP) holds some major advantages over conventional methods such as polycondensation, such as a variety of possible reaction conditions, simple initiators, and the possibility of copolymerization with vinyl monomers. This offers a broad spectrum of potential products. The obtained functionalized poly(ester- co -vinyl)s have so far been mainly discussed for biomedical applications. However, they could also be of interest as polyolefin alternatives in the context of increasing plastic pollution. In this work, a comonomer system consisting of 2-methylene-4-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane (MPDL) and syringyl methacrylate (SM) was explored, as high glass transition temperature polymers with predetermined breaking points are required for degradation. Due to the wide difference in the reactivity of the two monomers (copolymerization parameters r MPDL = 0.004 and r SM = 5.407), the homogeneous distribution of ester moieties in the copolymer was achieved by semibatch copolymerization. The compositional homogeneity and degradation of ester units were studied by basic hydrolysis in KOH.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Bayreuth, Macromolecular Chemistry II, Universitätsstraße 30, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
University of Bayreuth, Bavarian Polymer Institute, Universitätsstraße 30, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-1-4615-6740-0_410.1007/978-1-4615-6740-0_4 ↗
2. 10.1002/marc.20220094110.1002/marc.202200941 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.02.01510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.02.015 ↗
4. 10.1021/bm500689g10.1021/bm500689g ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0121210.1021/acs.macromol.6b01212 ↗
6. 10.1002/macp.20110037510.1002/macp.201100375 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0047610.1021/acs.biomac.5b00476 ↗
8. 10.1002/macp.20120022010.1002/macp.201200220 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0031910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00319 ↗
10. 10.1039/c0py00040j10.1039/c0py00040j ↗
11. 10.1038/s41598-018-36172-y10.1038/s41598-018-36172-y ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.19010.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.00610.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.006 ↗
14. 10.1371/journal.pone.009583910.1371/journal.pone.0095839 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-1-4613-8486-1_1010.1007/978-1-4613-8486-1_10 ↗
16. Bullimore B. · Fishery Bulletin · 2001 · 99 · 247
17. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.04.01710.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.04.017 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00236-310.1016/S0025-326X(01)00236-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00264-310.1016/S0025-326X(02)00264-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.02510.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025 ↗
21. 10.1201/978042919081010.1201/9780429190810 ↗
22. 10.1002/macp.1982.02183081110.1002/macp.1982.021830811 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b0027010.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00270 ↗
24. 10.1039/C6PY00778C10.1039/C6PY00778C ↗
25. 10.1080/0022233810806323510.1080/00222338108063235 ↗
26. 10.1002/978352762655710.1002/9783527626557 ↗
27. 10.1080/0022233760806076810.1080/00222337608060768 ↗
28. Brandrup J. · 1999