Exploring Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose as a Substitute for Cellulose Acetate: Fabrication and Potential Applications of a Porous Membrane
Source abstract
Abstract
Cellulose, abundantly available on earth, offers numerous advantages that have spurred extensive research. Porous cellulose acetate is notably widely applied in diverse industries. Despite its benefits, cellulose acetate is limited by its relatively lower thermal stability and solubility restricted to organic solvents. This study presents a porous membrane composed of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (SCMC) as an alternative to cellulose acetate. SCMC, characterized by its remarkable thermal stability, facile film-forming capability, sustained dispersibility in aqueous solutions, and emulsion-forming ability, was utilized. The manufacturing process of the SCMC membrane employed a free-standing technique with lactic acid as an additive, yielding a film that generated unobstructed pores aided by nitrogen gas. Gas permeation began at 2.5 bar and achieved a peak performance of 1.5 GPU at 3 bar. The interaction between SCMC and lactic acid was confirmed through shifts in Fourier transform infrared spectral peaks, and the thermal stability was validated via thermogravimetric analysis. Thus, the development of a porous SCMC membrane heralds a range of potential applications, extending beyond lithium-ion batteries to various industrial sectors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Energy Engineering, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Republic of Korea
Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Soonchunhyang University · Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.01.00710.1016/j.ccr.2019.01.007 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10924-014-0694-310.1007/s10924-014-0694-3 ↗
3. 10.1080/1060132930802125910.1080/10601329308021259 ↗
4. 10.1021/cr900339w10.1021/cr900339w ↗
5. 10.1007/s10019005003110.1007/s100190050031 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10570-012-9784-310.1007/s10570-012-9784-3 ↗
7. Shokri J. · 2013 · 47
8. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.9010.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.90 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.01310.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.013 ↗
10. 10.1039/b415102j10.1039/b415102j ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0020910.1021/acsenergylett.6b00209 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11814-022-1130-310.1007/s11814-022-1130-3 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11697510.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116975 ↗
14. 10.1002/tcr.20190005410.1002/tcr.201900054 ↗
15. 10.1016/S2095-4956(15)60294-710.1016/S2095-4956(15)60294-7 ↗
16. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac2dca10.1149/1945-7111/ac2dca ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.27610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.276 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22881210.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228812 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.1141910jes10.1149/2.1141910jes ↗
20. Voicu S. I. · J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 16 · 903
21. 10.1039/C6CS00823B10.1039/C6CS00823B ↗
22. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13391410.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133914 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13558510.1016/j.electacta.2019.135585 ↗
24. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.671.27910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.671.279 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.016 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11818510.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118185 ↗
28. Feddersen R. L. · 1993 · 53710.1016/B978-0-08-092654-4.50024-3 ↗
29. 10.1155/2011/36949210.1155/2011/369492 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1503061910.3390/polym15030619 ↗