journal article·2024-06-14Open access

Immiscible Polymer Blends Made from Industrial Shredder Residue Mixed Plastic with and without Melt Blending

Kanjanawadee Singkronart, Jussi Virkajärvi, Kristian Salminen, Siti Ros Shamsuddin, Koon-Yang Lee

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 6· Issue 11

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The processing of an immiscible polymer blend using melt blending (i.e., extrusion) often results in a polymer material with inferior mechanical performance compared with its virgin counterparts. Here, we report and compare the properties of immiscible polymer blends produced from industrial mixed plastic waste from shredder residue comprising at least four different polymers (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polystyrene, polypropylene, and polyethylene) with and without a prior melt-blending step employed. As anticipated, mixed plastic blend produced with a prior melt-blending step exhibited a more homogeneous microstructure, resulting in brittleness, poor work of fracture, and single-edge notched fracture toughness with a flat R-curve. Without the intimate polymers mixing arising from melt blending, the resulting mixed plastic blend was found to possess a more heterogeneous concentric ellipsoid microstructure with large single polymer domains. This mixed plastic blend demonstrated progressive failure under uniaxial tensile loading, along with a more ductile single-edge notched fracture toughness response accompanied by a growing R-curve. Digital image correlation and fractographic analysis revealed that melt blending created a large number of incompatible polymer boundaries that acted as stress concentration points, leading to brittleness and earlier onset catastrophic failure. The more heterogeneous mixed plastic blend produced without using a prior melt-blending step contains a smaller number of incompatible polymer boundaries. Additionally, the presence of larger single polymer domains also implies that the mechanical characteristics of the single polymer can be exploited in the immiscible mixed plastic blend. Our work opens up a simple pathway to add value to mixed plastic waste from shredder residue for use in engineering applications, diverting them away from landfill or incineration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, FI-40101 Jyväskylä, Finland

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · National Science and Technology Development Agency

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. European Commission. European Green Deal; Brussels, 2019, https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en (accessed Sep 22, 2023).
2. Plastics Europe. A New Circular Economy Action Plan, 2021, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/ (accessed Jan 10, 2023).
3. European Commission. A New Circular Economy Action Plan; Brussels, 2020, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/ (accessed Dec 10, 2023).
4. Plastics Europe. Plastics-the Facts An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data; Brussel, 2022, https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/ (accessed Jan 10, 2024).
5. Eurostat. Recycling rate of municipal packaging waste in the European Union (EU-27) in 2022, by material. In Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1072637/recycling-of-municipal-waste-in-the-eu-by-material/ (accessed Jan 10, 2024).
6. 10.1002/marc.20200041510.1002/marc.202000415 ↗
7. WRAP. Defining What’s Recyclable and Best in Class Polymer Choices for Packaging, 2022, https://wrap.org.uk/resources/guide/design-guidance-recyclability-household-rigid-plastic-packaging (accessed Dec 10, 2023).
8. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0501310.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.10673410.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106734 ↗
10. Plastics Europe. Circular Economy for Plastics-Europe Plastic 2022, 2021 https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/the-circular-economy-for-plastics-a-european-overview-2/ (accessed Dec 10, 2023).
11. 10.1038/s41558-019-0459-z10.1038/s41558-019-0459-z ↗
12. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10588710.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105887 ↗
13. 10.1002/mame.20070039310.1002/mame.200700393 ↗
14. Van schaik A. · 2012 · 16310.1533/9780857096333.2.163 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.02810.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.028 ↗
16. Développement Durable, D.; Monier, V.; Benhallam, R.; Maccario, F.; Basciano, R. Annual Report the End-of-Life Vehicle Observatory 2017 Data; 2019.
17. 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00061-X10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00061-X ↗
18. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0185010.1021/acsapm.1c01850 ↗
19. 10.1039/D3GC02198J10.1039/D3GC02198J ↗
20. Utracki, L. A.; Wilkie, C. A. Polymer Blends Handbook, 2nd ed. 2014. 10.1007/978-94-007-6064-6.10.1007/978-94-007-6064-6 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10118-010-9150-610.1007/s10118-010-9150-6 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.1990.07039030310.1002/app.1990.070390303 ↗
23. 10.3390/recycling101008910.3390/recycling1010089 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10745810.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107458 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.02.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.02.006 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.46550510.1063/1.465505 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.172362110.1063/1.1723621 ↗
28. Shinoda K. · 1978 · 5
29. 10.3390/ma908065910.3390/ma9080659 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.76035170210.1002/pen.760351702 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.02210.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.022 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jaap.2006.10.00610.1016/j.jaap.2006.10.006 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.01010.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.010 ↗
34. 10.1038/pj.2010.8610.1038/pj.2010.86 ↗
35. Mark J. E. · 1999 · 1
36. 10.1002/pen.76026201610.1002/pen.760262016 ↗
37. 10.1016/0032-3861(96)87620-810.1016/0032-3861(96)87620-8 ↗
38. 10.1002/app.1047210.1002/app.10472 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.1993.07050060910.1002/app.1993.070500609 ↗
40. 10.1039/C5RA07193C10.1039/C5RA07193C ↗
41. 10.1080/1558372980854452910.1080/15583729808544529 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2018.12.00710.1016/j.jnnfm.2018.12.007 ↗
43. 10.1016/0032-3861(95)91438-D10.1016/0032-3861(95)91438-D ↗
44. 10.1002/pc.2234210.1002/pc.22342 ↗
45. 10.1007/s13726-014-0236-910.1007/s13726-014-0236-9 ↗
46. 10.1080/03602559.2016.125575210.1080/03602559.2016.1255752 ↗
47. 10.1002/pen.76024170810.1002/pen.760241708 ↗
48. 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90539-810.1016/0032-3861(94)90539-8 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00874-X10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00874-X ↗
50. Greenhalgh E. S. · 2009 · 279
51. Hull D. · 1999
52. 10.3390/su1213527210.3390/su12135272 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10853-009-3839-310.1007/s10853-009-3839-3 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41598-017-03884-610.1038/s41598-017-03884-6 ↗
55. 10.1007/s00289-020-03299-w10.1007/s00289-020-03299-w ↗
56. 10.1002/app.1995.07058010110.1002/app.1995.070580101 ↗
57. Corten H. T. · 197210.1520/STP514-EB ↗
58. 10.1295/polymj.8.18110.1295/polymj.8.181 ↗