journal article·2024-04-12

Additive Manufacturing of a Super Toughened Biodegradable Polymer Blend: Structure–Property-Processing Correlation and 3D Printed Prosthetic Part Development

Malik Hassan, Amar K. Mohanty, Manjusri Misra

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 6· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Super toughened polymer materials have garnered significant attention from the scientific and industrial communities due to their vast application potential. However, a notable gap exists in the exploration of additive manufacturing (AM) of biodegradable polymer blends with enhanced impact resistance. This research addresses this gap by investigating the AM of a resilient green blend comprising PLA, BioPBS, and PBAT to achieve an enhanced impact resistance. To characterize the blend, rheological analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, thermomechanical analysis, and mechanical testing were performed. The printing parameters varied were the nozzle temperature, infill density, top and bottom solid layer raster angles, and infill pattern. This study is the first attempt to investigate the impact of the raster angle of top and bottom solid layers, which is important for determining the structural integrity of printed objects. The study revealed that a nozzle temperature of 180 °C, a rectilinear infill pattern, 100% infill density, and solid layers raster angle of 0° resulted in high mechanical properties with a notched Izod impact strength of 489.75 ± 16.6 J/m. Additionally, the study compared the mechanical properties of 3D printed and injection-molded samples. The 3D printed samples demonstrated comparable tensile strength to injection-molded samples, with only a 2% difference, and exhibited higher tensile and flexural moduli, showcasing 8 and 10% increases, respectively. However, there was a 10% decrease in impact strength compared to that of the injection-molded counterparts. These findings indicate that the 3D printed blend offers mechanical properties comparable to injection molding, making it a promising alternative for biomedical applications. A 3D printed leg prosthesis prototype has been developed using the formulated blend at optimized printing conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering, Thornbrough Building, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada

Bioproducts Discovery and Development Centre, Department of Plant Agriculture, Crop Science Building, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada

Funding

Ontario Agri-Food Innovation Alliance · Ontario Research Foundation · Canada Research Chairs · University of Guelph · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Ministry of Colleges and Universities

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/003685041986720410.1177/0036850419867204 ↗
2. 10.3390/eng401004110.3390/eng4010041 ↗
3. 10.1002/pts.269910.1002/pts.2699 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10839910.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108399 ↗
5. 10.1002/mame.20140024110.1002/mame.201400241 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.04210.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.042 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.06.00610.1016/j.aiepr.2021.06.006 ↗
8. 10.1002/app.4627910.1002/app.46279 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.00210.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.002 ↗
10. 10.5772/intechopen.11017510.5772/intechopen.110175 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0027110.1021/acsapm.3c00271 ↗
12. 10.1021/sc500353v10.1021/sc500353v ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1107119310.3390/polym11071193 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10621110.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106211 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.00210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11130410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111304 ↗
17. 10.1515/epoly-2021-007210.1515/epoly-2021-0072 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0119510.1021/acsapm.9b01195 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0217110.1021/acsapm.2c02171 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0025210.1021/acsapm.1c00252 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11255810.1016/j.matdes.2023.112558 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0178410.1021/acsapm.3c01784 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0254910.1021/acsomega.8b02549 ↗
24. 10.1002/masy.20200015710.1002/masy.202000157 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1305074010.3390/polym13050740 ↗
26. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab06cf10.1088/2053-1591/ab06cf ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.42510.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.425 ↗
28. 10.2147/DDDT.S16544010.2147/DDDT.S165440 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41529-022-00277-710.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 ↗
30. 10.1108/RPJ-04-2021-009010.1108/RPJ-04-2021-0090 ↗
31. 10.3390/cryst1005039810.3390/cryst10050398 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10361110.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103611 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0258710.1021/acsomega.8b02587 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10425410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104254 ↗
35. 3D Printer Layer Height Vs Nozzle Size Explained - MakerShop. https://makershop.co/layer-height-vs-nozzle-size/ (accessed 2023–06–20).
36. 10.1038/s41598-020-68331-510.1038/s41598-020-68331-5 ↗
37. 3D Printing PLA, PETG and ABS while Protecting Your Lungs with an Encl – 3D UP Fitters. https://www.3dupfitters.com/blogs/news/managing-temperature-in-a-passive-3d-printer-enclosure (accessed 2023–08–23).
38. 10.1177/0892705721105303610.1177/08927057211053036 ↗
39. 10.3390/polym1311175810.3390/polym13111758 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00396-016-3830-x10.1007/s00396-016-3830-x ↗
41. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0167510.1021/acsomega.8b01675 ↗
42. 10.1520/E0831-19.210.1520/E0831-19.2 ↗
43. Materials, P.; Materials, E. I.; Matrix, P.; Materials, C.; Specimens, P. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics 1. 2006, No. January 2004, 1–15. 10.1520/D0638-14.1.10.1520/D0638-14.1 ↗
44. 10.1520/D0790-17.210.1520/D0790-17.2 ↗
45. American Society for Testing & Mater. Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics. 1987, i (Reapproved). 10.1520/D0256-10R18.N.10.1520/D0256-10R18.N ↗
46. Method, S. T. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Adhesive Bonded Laminated. 2004, 98 (Reapproved), 98–100. 10.1520/D1184-98R20.1.10.1520/D1184-98R20.1 ↗
47. 10.1520/D1621-16.210.1520/D1621-16.2 ↗
48. 10.3390/polym1209191610.3390/polym12091916 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10194410.1016/j.addma.2021.101944 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0122810.1021/acsapm.0c01228 ↗
51. 10.3390/polym1409175410.3390/polym14091754 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10165810.1016/j.addma.2020.101658 ↗
53. 10.1039/D1SM00417D10.1039/D1SM00417D ↗
54. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c0056310.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00563 ↗
55. 10.3390/polym1422498810.3390/polym14224988 ↗
56. 10.3390/polym1212305610.3390/polym12123056 ↗
57. 10.3390/molecules2614416410.3390/molecules26144164 ↗
58. 10.1007/s00170-017-1340-810.1007/s00170-017-1340-8 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.31010.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.310 ↗
60. 10.1007/s40430-020-02742-310.1007/s40430-020-02742-3 ↗
61. 10.1089/3dp.2015.003610.1089/3dp.2015.0036 ↗
62. 10.1177/095440621985638310.1177/0954406219856383 ↗
63. 10.1002/pc.2523010.1002/pc.25230 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.04210.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.042 ↗
65. 10.1007/s11665-021-05889-910.1007/s11665-021-05889-9 ↗
66. 10.3390/polym1509201910.3390/polym15092019 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.10196510.1016/j.jcou.2022.101965 ↗