Ultrasound-based separation of ethanol-water mixtures is economically advantageous and sustainable
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultrasonic separation of azeotropic mixtures has long been proposed as a promising separation technique, especially for ethanol-water mixtures. Since ultrasonic separation operates at ambient pressure, uses electricity as an energy source, and does not involve phase transitions, it is expected to have environmental advantages over conventional technologies. However, the economic and environmental potential of ultrasonic separation on a commercial scale remains unknown. We conduct a combined experimental and computational study leading to a data-driven techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of commercial-scale ultrasonic separation. We obtain experimental measurements of ethanol-water ultrasonic separation under room pressure, temperatures of 10°C to 55°C, and carrier gas flow rates of 1 to 5 L min−1 and use them to develop process simulations. Our economic and environmental evaluations show that commercial-scale ultrasonic separation can reduce total annualized cost by more than 10% and CO2-eq emissions by more than 40%, making it a potentially attractive alternative to conventional thermal separation technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Process Optimization and Integration · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it?10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.003 ↗
2. General technoeconomic analysis for electrochemical coproduction coupling carbon dioxide reduction with organic oxidation10.1038/s41467-019-12744-y ↗
3. Microbial| electrochemical CO2 reduction: To integrate or not to integrate?10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.005 ↗
4. Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of a biorefinery utilizing reductive catalytic fractionation10.1039/D1EE01642C ↗
5. Greening ammonia toward the solar ammonia refinery10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.017 ↗
6. Performance of a small-scale Haber process: A techno-economic analysis10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04313 ↗
7. Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen process in comparison with coal-to-hydrogen process10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.119 ↗
8. Cholinium dipeptide as the cornerstone to build promising separation processes: a simultaneous recovery strategy for microalgae biorefineries10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117288 ↗
9. Laboratory · 2005
10. Seven chemical separations to change the world10.1038/532435a ↗
11. Comparison of the Main Ethanol Dehydration Technologies through Process Simulation
12. Influence of multicomponent mass transfer on homogeneous azeotropic distillation10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00418-1 ↗
13. Modeling, simulation and control of an internally heat integrated pressure-swing distillation process for bioethanol separation10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.03.011 ↗
14. Simulation of pressure swing adsorption in fuel ethanol production process10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.07.011 ↗
15. Ethanol dehydration in a pressure swing adsorption process using canola meal10.1021/ef400897e ↗
16. Simulation and cost analysis of distillation and purification step in production of anhydrous ethanol from sweet sorghum10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01082 ↗
17. Improvements on anhydrous ethanol production by extractive distillation using ionic liquid as solvent10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.493 ↗
18. Anhydrous ethanol production by extractive distillation: A solvent case study10.1016/j.psep.2009.11.005 ↗
19. Vapor-liquid equilibrium of ethanol/water/N,N-dimethylformamide10.1021/je00049a024 ↗
20. Ethanol separation from ethanol-water solution by ultrasonic atomization and its proposed mechanism based on parametric decay instability of capillary wave10.1063/1.1336842 ↗
21. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
22. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions in aqueous mixtures of alcohols at a hydrophobic surface
23. Techno-economic comparison of energy usage between azeotropic distillation and hybrid system for water–ethanol separation10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.055 ↗
24. Comparison of complete extractive and azeotropic distillation processes for anhydrous ethanol production using Aspen Plus™ simulator
25. Raosaheb P.S. Steady state simulation of an azeotropic distillation system using Aspen Plus. 2015. Project report, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela. http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/7113/1/Steady_Raosaheb_2015.pdf
26. Vasconcelos C., Wolf M. (2002) Optimisation, dynamics and control of a complete azeotropic distillation: New strategies and stability considerations. In Proceedings of International Conference on Distillation and Absorption, Germany.
27. Economic and environmental comparison of bioethanol dehydration processes via simulation: reactive distillation, reactor–separator process and azeotropic distillation10.1007/s10098-019-01762-5 ↗
28. Separation of ethanol and water by extractive distillation with salt and solvent as entrainer: process simulation10.1590/S0104-66322008000100021 ↗
29. Cardona · 2009
30. Ethanol enrichment from ethanol-water mixtures using high frequency ultrasonic atomization10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.05.013 ↗
31. Ultrasound-assisted nonthermal, nonequilibrium separation of organic molecules from their binary aqueous solutions: Effect of solute properties on separation10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06793 ↗
32. A revisit to the separation of a binary mixture of ethanol–water using ultrasonic distillation as a separation process10.1016/j.cep.2014.11.004 ↗
33. Revealing the physicochemical mechanism for ultrasonic separation of alcohol–water mixtures10.1063/1.1495849 ↗
34. Simulation of ethanol extractive distillation with mixed glycols as separating agent10.1590/S0104-66322014000100024 ↗
35. Seider · 2016
36. Jenkins S. 2021 CEPCI Updates: September (prelim.) and August (final). 2021. https://www.chemengonline.com/2021-cepci-updates-september-prelim-and-august-final/?printmode=1
37. Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.024 ↗
38. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 ↗
39. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y ↗
40. ReCiPe 2016: A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y ↗
41. Steiner & Martins, Inc., Mist Generation Kit. https://www.steminc.com/PZT/en/mist-generation-kit-2-50-mhz