Mechanical Properties and Failure of Aerospace-Grade Epoxy Resins from Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Nanoscale Defects
Source abstract
Abstract
This study found that a scaled-down defect epoxy model with combined force fields with GAFF2 and Morse bond potential captured nonlinear brittle epoxy behavior including failure events by allowing covalent bond-breaking under deformation. We performed uniaxial tensile and shear testing, and epoxy brittle behavior became apparent by increasing amounts of defects. This computational methodology provides more physically realistic thermosetting models that can facilitate better description of epoxy behavior, especially brittle fracture, and improved quantitative prediction of mechanical properties. The computational efficiency is greater for large deformation simulations compared to the ReaxFF force field, which generally requires a lower time step of ∼0.1 fs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
KBR, Inc., Intelligent Systems Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, United States
Intelligent Systems Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, United States
Funding
Langley Research Center
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.03710.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.037 ↗
2. 10.1080/0026897031000164008510.1080/00268970310001640085 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41524-021-00509-510.1038/s41524-021-00509-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.08.04510.1016/j.polymer.2012.08.045 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00707-013-1064-210.1007/s00707-013-1064-2 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja962176010.1021/ja9621760 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0065-3233(03)66002-X10.1016/S0065-3233(03)66002-X ↗
8. 10.1021/ja00086a03010.1021/ja00086a030 ↗
9. 10.1021/jp980939v10.1021/jp980939v ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.01260110.1103/PhysRevE.90.012601 ↗
11. Jang C. J. · J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. · 2022
12. 10.1016/0032-3861(95)91446-E10.1016/0032-3861(95)91446-E ↗
13. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0008710.1021/acsapm.1c00087 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10781410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107814 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.012 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0150810.1021/acs.macromol.6b01508 ↗
17. 10.3390/polym1208173210.3390/polym12081732 ↗
18. EPON Resin 282 Technical Data Bulletin; HEXION, 2005. https://www.spacematdb.com/spacemat/manudatasheets/Epon828.pdf (accessed 2021-08-26).
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.015 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.011 ↗
21. 10.1002/polb.2453910.1002/polb.24539 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.02210.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.022 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.08310.1016/j.msea.2010.04.083 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:3(162)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:3(162) ↗
25. 10.1557/JMR.1992.335210.1557/JMR.1992.3352 ↗
26. Zimmerman R. S. · 1984
27. Zimmerman R. S. · 1985
28. Zimmerman R. S. · 1988