journal article·2024-01-12Open access

Polyethylene Blends for Improved Oxygen Barrier: Processing-Dependent Microstructure and Gas Permeability

Kyungtae Kim, Aristotle J. Zervoudakis, Jacob A. LaNasa, Greg Haugstad, Fang Zhou, Bongjoon Lee, Olivier Lhost, Yves Trolez, Frank S. Bates, Christopher W. Macosko

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 6· Issue 1

Abstract

This work demonstrates a greater than expected enhancement of oxygen barrier properties in linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE)-based materials by blending LLDPE with high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The films made by melt pressing the LLDPE/HDPE blends had a greater reduction in oxygen permeability coefficients ( P O 2 ) than predicted using common permeability reduction models, i.e., the harmonic average model and zero-permeability nanofiller model. The reduction of P O 2 was attributed to the presence of spherulite crystal structures, as revealed by atomic force microscopy combined with infrared spectroscopy (AFM-IR). The LLDPE matrix exhibited significant spherulite formation even at a relatively low addition of HDPEs, which likely formed tortuous pathways for diffusing oxygen molecules. Transport results from melt-pressed films contrast with the results from films with similar compositions prepared by film blowing, which did not show barrier enhancement beyond expectation. AFM-IR revealed that the blown films lacked spherulite crystals likely due to stretching in the machine direction followed by rapid cooling. These findings demonstrate the role of processing in controlling microstructures and thus the oxygen barrier performance. This work offers the possibility of achieving easily recyclable LLDPE-based packaging materials by simple blending of polyethylenes with different crystalline content.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Science and PVC · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Materials Physics and Applications Division, Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States

Characterization Facility, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

TotalEnergies OneTech Belgium, Seneffe 7181, Belgium

Funding

Total · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems · University of Minnesota · Division of Materials Research

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Verified Market Research · 2022
2. Transparency Market Research · 2022
3. 10.1088/1742-6596/2229/1/01200910.1088/1742-6596/2229/1/012009 ↗
4. Butler T. I. · 2016 · 28110.1016/B978-0-323-37100-1.00017-X ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.02010.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.020 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0103010.1021/acsapm.9b01030 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0104110.1021/acsapm.9b01041 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.10172210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.101722 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0191810.1021/acsapm.2c01918 ↗
10. PE Flexible Films Recycling: New Findings for Functional Barriers, 2023. https://recyclass.eu/news/pe-flexible-films-recycling-new-findings-for-functional-barriers/.
11. Dow Chemical Company Recycle Ready Technology from Dow Receives Recyclass Recyclability, 2023. https://www.packworld.com/supplier-news/news/22847355/dow-chemical-company-recycleready-technology-from-dow-receives-recyclass-recyclability-approval.
12. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0352310.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03523 ↗
13. 10.1002/pts.214610.1002/pts.2146 ↗
14. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.334-335.24910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.334-335.249 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10853-015-9296-210.1007/s10853-015-9296-2 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.2683910.1002/app.26839 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.09.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.09.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10788810.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107888 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0216810.1021/acs.iecr.6b02168 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.2c0858610.1021/acsami.2c08586 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0020610.1021/acs.macromol.8b00206 ↗
22. 10.1177/87560879990150010410.1177/875608799901500104 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.02910.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.029 ↗
24. ASTM D3985-17 · 1998
25. ASTM D1434-23 · 1998
26. 10.1063/5.006390210.1063/5.0063902 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0201910.1021/acs.macromol.7b02019 ↗
28. Haugstad G. · 201210.1002/9781118360668 ↗
29. 10.1002/polb.2047310.1002/polb.20473 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00305-110.1016/S0032-3861(02)00305-1 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0090710.1021/acs.macromol.7b00907 ↗
32. 10.1002/pol.1967.16005051410.1002/pol.1967.160050514 ↗
33. Smith B. C. · 1999
34. 10.1002/pen.1114510.1002/pen.11145 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.4221110.1002/app.42211 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.02510.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.025 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.00910.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.009 ↗
38. Oxygen Transmission Rate, 2023. https://www.polyprint.com/understanding-film-properties/flexographic-otr/.
39. Understanding OTR & MVTR Specifications for Barrier Food Packaging, 2023. https://blog.icpg.co/understanding-otr-mvtr-specifications-for-barrier-food-packaging.
40. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.03410.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.034 ↗