Surface-Localized Chemically Modified Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites as Flexible Conductive Surfaces for Space Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Thermoplastic polymers are a compelling class of materials for emerging space exploration applications due to their wide range of mechanical properties and compatibility with a variety of processing methods, including additive manufacturing. However, despite these benefits, the use of thermoplastic polymers in a set of critical space applications is limited by their low electrical conductivity, which makes them susceptible to static charging and limits their ability to be used as active and passive components in electronic devices, including materials for static charge dissipation, resistive heaters, and electrodynamic dust shielding devices. Herein, we explore the microstructural evolution of electrically conductive, surface-localized nanocomposites (SLNCs) of chemically modified reduced graphene oxide and a set of thermoplastic polymers as a function of critical thermal properties of the substrate (melting temperature for semi-crystalline materials or glass transition temperature for amorphous materials). Selected offsets from critical substrate temperatures were used to produce SLNCs with conductivities between 0.6–3 S/cm and surface structures, which ranged from particle-rich, porous surfaces to polymer-rich, non-porous surfaces. We then demonstrate the physical durability of these electrically conductive SLNCs to expected stress conditions for flexible conductive materials in lunar applications including tension, flexion, and abrasion with lunar simulant. Small changes in resistance ( R / R 0 < 2) were measured under uniaxial tension up to 20% strain in high density polyethylene and up to 500 abrasion cycles in polysulfone, demonstrating the applicability of these materials as active and passive flexible conductors in exterior lunar applications. The tough, electrically conductive SLNCs developed here could greatly expand the use of polymeric materials in space applications, including lunar exploration, micro- and nano-satellites, and other orbital structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics (COPE), Georgia Tech Polymer Network (GTPN), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Defense · National Aeronautics and Space Administration
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/admt.20200002810.1002/admt.202000028 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.asr.2014.12.02710.1016/j.asr.2014.12.027 ↗
3. Calle, C. I.; Mazumder, M. K.; Immer, C. D.; Buhler, C. R.; Clements, S.; Lundeen, P.; Chen, A.; Mantovani, J. G. In Electrodynamic dust sheild for surface exploration activities on the Moon and Mars; In 57th International Astronautical Congress, 2006.10.2514/6.IAC-06-A5.2.07 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0017528410.1007/BF00175284 ↗
5. Farrell, W. M.; Jackson, T. L.; Marshall, J. R.; Delory, G. T. In The Need for Conductive Space Suits: a Summary of DREAM 2 Findings; NESF, 2015.
6. Farrell, W. M.; McLain, J. L.; Zimmerman, M. I.; Hartzell, C. M.; Fester, Z. T. In Lunar Dust-to-Suit Electrostatic Interactions: Insulating vs. Conducting Space Suits; Lunar Dust Workshop, 2020.
7. 10.1007/s10854-020-05178-610.1007/s10854-020-05178-6 ↗
8. 10.1021/am300783d10.1021/am300783d ↗
9. 10.1007/s12567-021-00361-910.1007/s12567-021-00361-9 ↗
10. 10.1088/2053-1583/aac05510.1088/2053-1583/aac055 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.5b0136710.1021/acsami.5b01367 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0049110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00491 ↗
13. 10.1021/nn100026n10.1021/nn100026n ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0197810.1021/acs.iecr.0c01978 ↗
15. 10.1021/la101827c10.1021/la101827c ↗
16. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0283510.1021/acsnano.0c02835 ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20150267010.1002/smll.201502670 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12227010.1016/j.polymer.2020.122270 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/1/01570410.1088/0957-4484/24/1/015704 ↗
20. 10.1039/c4nr05464d10.1039/c4nr05464d ↗
21. 10.1039/c9nr00117d10.1039/c9nr00117d ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.09210.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.092 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jsse.2019.10.00110.1016/j.jsse.2019.10.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.02.003 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0253910.1021/acsanm.0c02539 ↗
26. Gaier, J. A.; Meador, M. A.; Rogers, K. J.; Sheehy, B. H. In Abrasion of Candidate Spacesuit Fabrics by Simulated Lunar Dust; NASA/TM-2009-215800, 2009.10.4271/2009-01-2473 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.11763210.1016/j.epsl.2022.117632 ↗
28. Klapetek, P.; Necas, D.; Anderson, C. In Data processing and analysis; Gywddion User Guide, 2022.
29. 10.1002/adma.20130191210.1002/adma.201301912 ↗
30. Christoffersen, R.; Lindsay, J. F.; Noble, S. K.; Meador, M. A.; Kosmo, J. J.; Lawrence, J. A.; Brostoff, L.; Young, A.; McCue, T. In Lunar Dust Effects on Spacesuit Systems: Insights from the Apollo Spacesuits, NASA/TP-2009-214786; NASA, 2009.
31. Gaier, J. R.; Creel, R. A. In The Effects of Lunar Dust on Advanced EVA Systems: Lessons from Apollo, Advanced Extravehicular Vehicle Program; NASA, 2005.
32. Banks, B. A.; Demko, R. In Atomic Oxygen Protection of Materials in Low Earth Orbit; International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, 2002; pp 820–832.
33. 10.1002/app.1099910.1002/app.10999 ↗
34. 10.1002/lapl.20041007710.1002/lapl.200410077 ↗
35. Al-Rubaiai, M.; Tsuruta, R.; Nam, T.; Gandhi, U.; Tan, X. In Direct Printing of a Flexible Strain Sensor for Distributed Monitoring of Deformation in Inflatable Structures, ASME Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent System; ASME, 2019.10.1115/SMASIS2019-5713 ↗
36. Schaible, M. J.; Sjolund, K. G.; Ryan, E. A.; Shofner, M. L.; Reynolds, J. R.; Linsey, J. S.; Orlando, T. M. Performance of chemically modified reduced graphene oxide (CMrGO) in electrodynamic dust shield (EDS) applications 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01891.10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.07.003 ↗