journal article·2021-04Open access

Toward smart carbon capture with machine learning

Mohammad Rahimi, Seyed Mohamad Moosavi, Berend Smit, T. Alan Hatton

Cell Reports Physical Science· Volume 2· Issue 4

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a powerful approach that has recently shown potential to affect various frontiers of carbon capture, a key interim technology to assist in the mitigation of climate change. In this perspective, we reveal how ML implementations have improved this process in many aspects, for both absorption- and adsorption-based approaches, ranging from the molecular to process level. We discuss the role of ML in predicting the thermodynamic properties of absorbents and in improving the absorption process. For adsorption processes, we discuss the promises of ML techniques for exploring many options to find the most cost-effective process scheme, which involves choosing a solid adsorbent and designing a process configuration. We also highlight the advantages of ML and the associated risks, elaborate on the importance of the features needed to train ML models, and identify promising future opportunities for ML in carbon capture processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 C pathways10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 ↗
2. Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5 ↗
3. Public awareness: what climate change scientists should consider10.3390/su12208369 ↗
4. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward10.1039/C7EE02342A ↗
5. A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 ↗
6. Postcombustion capture or direct air capture in decarbonizing US natural gas power?10.1021/acs.est.0c00161 ↗
7. What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it?10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.003 ↗
8. Smit · 2014 · Volume 1
9. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture10.1126/science.1176731 ↗
10. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 ↗
11. Effectiveness of amino acid salt solutions in capturing CO2: A review10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.019 ↗
12. CO2 capture with potassium carbonate solutions: a state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.026 ↗
13. Ionic-liquid-based CO2 capture systems: structure, interaction and process10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00072 ↗
14. Ionic liquid-based CO2 capture in power plants for low carbon emissions10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.05.025 ↗
15. CO2 capture by supported ionic liquid phase: highlighting the role of the particle size10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02277 ↗
16. Metal-organic frameworks for separations10.1021/cr200190s ↗
17. Carbon dioxide capture in metal-organic frameworks10.1021/cr2003272 ↗
18. Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials10.1002/anie.201000431 ↗
19. A search for selectivity to enable CO2 capture with porous adsorbents10.1039/C7EE02110K ↗
20. Trends in solid adsorbent materials development for CO2 capture10.1021/acsami.9b08487 ↗
21. CO2 capture and separations using MOFs: computational and experimental studies10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 ↗
22. MOF-based membranes for gas separations10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00119 ↗
23. Data-driven design of metal-organic frameworks for wet flue gas CO2 capture10.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 ↗
24. Cooperative carbon capture and steam regeneration with tetraamine-appended metal-organic frameworks10.1126/science.abb3976 ↗
25. Machine learning for molecular and materials science10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
26. Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation10.1038/s41578-018-0005-z ↗
27. Learning to make chemical predictions: the interplay of feature representation, data, and machine learning methods10.1016/j.chempr.2020.05.014 ↗
28. Chemml: a machine learning and informatics program package for the analysis, mining, and modeling of chemical and materials data10.1002/wcms.1458 ↗
29. Alpaydin · 2020
30. Mohri · 2018
31. Big-data science in porous materials: materials genomics and machine learning10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00004 ↗
32. The role of machine learning in the understanding and design of materials10.1021/jacs.0c09105 ↗
33. Computational modeling and simulation of CO2 capture by aqueous amines10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00662 ↗
34. Gas solubility in ionic liquids10.1021/cr300497a ↗
35. Artificial neural network models for the prediction of CO2 solubility in aqueous amine solutions10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.005 ↗
36. Experimental data, thermodynamic and neural network modeling of CO2 absorption capacity for 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP)+ Methanol (MeOH)+ H2O system10.1016/j.jngse.2019.103060 ↗
37. Performance evaluation of the machine learning approaches in modeling of CO2 equilibrium absorption in Piperazine aqueous solution10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.156 ↗
38. Analysis of CO2 equilibrium solubility of seven tertiary amine solvents using thermodynamic and ANN models10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.088 ↗
39. Thermodynamics and ANN models for predication of the equilibrium CO2 solubility in aqueous 3-dimethylamino-1-propanol solution10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.05.007 ↗
40. A modeling-optimization framework for assessment of CO2 absorption capacity by novel amine solutions: 1DMA2P, 1DEA2P, DEEA, and DEAB10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.285 ↗
41. Modeling CO2 absorption in aqueous solutions of DEA, MDEA, and DEA+ MDEA based on intelligent methods10.1080/01496395.2019.1575415 ↗
42. Analyzing the experimental data of CO2 equilibrium absorption in the aqueous solution of DEA+ MDEA with Random Forest and Leverage method10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.028 ↗
43. A systematic review on CO2 capture with ionic liquids: Current status and future prospects10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.004 ↗
44. Ionic liquids: potential materials for carbon dioxide capture and utilization10.3389/fmats.2019.00042 ↗
45. Absorption of CO2-rich gaseous mixtures in ionic liquids: a computational study10.1016/j.supflu.2017.10.024 ↗
46. Accurate prediction of miscibility of CO2 and supercritical CO2 in ionic liquids using machine learning10.1016/j.jcou.2018.03.004 ↗
47. Application of decision tree learning in modelling CO2 equilibrium absorption in ionic liquids10.1016/j.molliq.2017.05.016 ↗
48. Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of diverse materials properties10.1021/cr200066h ↗
49. Predicting CO2 capture of ionic liquids using machine learning10.1016/j.jcou.2017.06.012 ↗
50. Prediction of CO2 solubility in ionic liquids using machine learning methods10.1016/j.ces.2020.115752 ↗
51. CO2 capture with aqueous solution of sodium glycinate: modeling using an ensemble method10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.029 ↗
52. Machine learning predictive framework for CO2 thermodynamic properties in solution10.1016/j.jcou.2018.04.025 ↗
53. Characterizing CO2 capture with aqueous solutions of LysK and the mixture of MAPA+ DEEA using soft computing methods10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.061 ↗
54. Mining the intrinsic trends of CO2 solubility in blended solutions.10.1016/j.jcou.2018.06.008 ↗
55. Prediction of CO2 absorption by physical solvents using a chemoinformatics-based machine learning model10.1007/s10311-019-00874-0 ↗
56. Viscosity of ionic liquids: an extensive database and a new group contribution model based on a feed-forward artificial neural network10.1021/ci500206u ↗
57. Evaluation of density, viscosity, surface tension and CO2 solubility for single, binary and ternary aqueous solutions of MDEA, PZ and 12 common ILs by using artificial neural network (ANN) technique10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.008 ↗
58. Rapid, comprehensive screening of ionic liquids towards sustainable applications10.1039/C9SE00472F ↗
59. Water-lean solvents for post-combustion CO2 capture: fundamentals, uncertainties, opportunities, and outlook10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00768 ↗
60. Quantitative structure-property relationship modelling of thermal decomposition temperatures of ionic liquids10.1016/j.molliq.2016.08.023 ↗
61. A review of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies from coal-fired power plants10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1209 ↗
62. The use of artificial neural network models for CO2 capture plants10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.013 ↗
63. Modelling of a post-combustion CO 2 capture process using extreme learning machine10.1007/s40789-017-0158-1 ↗
64. Modelling of a post-combustion CO2 capture process using neural networks10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.038 ↗
65. Modelling of a post-combustion CO2 capture process using deep belief network10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.078 ↗
66. Modelling of a post-combustion CO2 capture process using bootstrap aggregated extreme learning machines10.1016/B978-0-444-63428-3.50339-8 ↗
67. A machine learning approach for modeling and optimization of a CO2 post-combustion capture unit10.1016/j.energy.2020.119113 ↗
68. Cost reduction of CO2 capture processes using reinforcement learning based iterative design: A pilot-scale absorption–stripping system10.1016/j.seppur.2013.10.023 ↗
69. Performance-based screening of porous materials for carbon capture
70. Synergistic material and process development: application of a metal-organic framework, Cu-TDPAT, in single-cycle hydrogen purification and CO2 capture from synthesis gas10.1016/j.cej.2021.128778 ↗
71. Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption10.1039/c1ee01720a ↗
72. Evaluating different classes of porous materials for carbon capture10.1039/C4EE02636E ↗
73. Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture10.1002/anie.201101891 ↗
74. Exploring the limits of adsorption-based CO2 capture using MOFs with PVSA–from molecular design to process economics10.1039/C9ME00102F ↗
75. Screening the Effect of Water Vapour on Gas Adsorption Performance: Application to CO2 Capture from Flue Gas in Metal-Organic Frameworks10.1002/cssc.201601816 ↗
76. Carbon capture and conversion using metal-organic frameworks and MOF-based materials10.1039/C8CS00829A ↗
77. Development of a Cambridge Structural Database Subset: A Collection of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Past, Present, and Future10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00441 ↗
78. Targeted classification of metal-organic frameworks in the Cambridge structural database (CSD)10.1039/D0SC01297A ↗
79. Advances, Updates, and Analytics for the Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Framework Database: CoRE MOF 201910.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
80. Evaluating topologically diverse metal–organic frameworks for cryo-adsorbed hydrogen storage10.1039/C6EE02104B ↗
81. A generalized method for constructing hypothetical nanoporous materials of any net topology from graph theory10.1039/C6CE00407E ↗
82. Computational development of the nanoporous materials genome10.1038/natrevmats.2017.37 ↗
83. Understanding the diversity of the metal-organic framework ecosystem10.1038/s41467-020-17755-8 ↗
84. Quantifying similarity of pore-geometry in nanoporous materials10.1038/ncomms15396 ↗
85. Geometric landscapes for material discovery within energy–structure–function maps10.1039/D0SC00049C ↗
86. High-throughput screening approach for nanoporous materials genome using topological data analysis: application to zeolites10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00253 ↗
87. Atomic property weighted radial distribution functions descriptors of metal–organic frameworks for the prediction of gas uptake capacity10.1021/jp404287t ↗
88. Rapid and accurate machine learning recognition of high performing metal organic frameworks for CO2 capture10.1021/jz501331m ↗
89. A quantitative uncertainty metric controls error in neural network-driven chemical discovery10.1039/C9SC02298H ↗
90. Using collective knowledge to assign oxidation states
91. Identification schemes for metal–organic frameworks to enable rapid search and cheminformatics analysis10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01050 ↗
92. Deep neural network learning of complex binary sorption equilibria from molecular simulation data10.1039/C8SC05340E ↗
93. Do adsorbent screening metrics predict process performance? A process optimisation based study for post-combustion capture of CO210.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.033 ↗
94. Energy and cost estimates for capturing CO2 from a dry flue gas using pressure/vacuum swing adsorption10.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.033 ↗
95. Techno-economic assessment of optimised vacuum swing adsorption for post-combustion CO2 capture from steam-methane reformer flue gas10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117832 ↗
96. Exploring new sources of efficiency in process-driven materials screening for post-combustion carbon capture10.1039/C9EE03977E ↗
97. Cycle design and optimization of pressure swing adsorption cycles for pre-combustion CO2 capture10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113624 ↗
98. Machine learning-based multiobjective optimization of pressure swing adsorption10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04173 ↗
99. Too many materials and too many applications: an experimental problem waiting for a computational solution10.1021/acscentsci.0c00988 ↗
100. Prediction of mof performance in vacuum swing adsorption systems for postcombustion CO2 capture based on integrated molecular simulations, process optimizations, and machine learning models10.1021/acs.est.9b07407 ↗