journal article·2022-01-14

Making Protein-Based Adhesives Water Resistant: Role of Protein Water Solubility, Galloyl Modification, and Complexation

Saeed Zajforoushan Moghaddam, Runtian Qie, Esben Thormann

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 4· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

There has been an ongoing interest in using proteins as more environmentally friendly substitutes for the existing synthetic adhesives. Poor water resistance is a particular shortcoming of protein-based adhesives, which negatively affects their outdoor functionality. In this study, we systematically investigated if water solubility of the protein, addition of a phenolic compound such as tannic acid, and protein–polyphenol complexation could improve the water resistance of protein-based adhesives. It was found that the synergetic effects of these parameters can yield commercial-level water resistance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

Funding

China Scholarship Council

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8GC03746A10.1039/C8GC03746A ↗
2. 10.1201/978131512094210.1201/9781315120942 ↗
3. 10.1533/978085709615910.1533/9780857096159 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20170464010.1002/adma.201704640 ↗
5. 10.1002/pola.2836810.1002/pola.28368 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0069810.1021/acsapm.9b00698 ↗
7. 10.1242/jeb.13405610.1242/jeb.134056 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-020-17597-410.1038/s41467-020-17597-4 ↗
9. 10.1038/ncomms973710.1038/ncomms9737 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.00710.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.007 ↗
11. 10.1038/ncomms1453910.1038/ncomms14539 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.152152111310.1073/pnas.1521521113 ↗
13. 10.1002/adsu.20190007710.1002/adsu.201900077 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10285810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102858 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10924-017-1090-610.1007/s10924-017-1090-6 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0682210.1021/acs.iecr.9b06822 ↗
17. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800350-3.00002-910.1016/B978-0-12-800350-3.00002-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.07710.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.077 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.04.01310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.04.013 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-017-10007-810.1038/s41598-017-10007-8 ↗
21. 10.1002/adsu.20170015910.1002/adsu.201700159 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.09.00810.1016/j.foodres.2010.09.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.02.01410.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.02.014 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.02410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.024 ↗
25. Ku K. · J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. · 2007 · 17 · 520
26. 10.1021/ma047629x10.1021/ma047629x ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.0c0203710.1021/acsami.0c02037 ↗
28. 10.1039/C7SM01735A10.1039/C7SM01735A ↗
29. 10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00064-910.1016/S0926-6690(00)00064-9 ↗
30. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0117910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01179 ↗