journal article·2023-01-13

Humidity Sensors Based on Magnetic Ionic Liquids Blended in Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene)

João P. Serra, Liliana C. Fernandes, Nelson Pereira, Arkaitz Fidalgo-Marijuan, José M. Porro, Carlos M. Costa, Daniela M. Correia, Senentxu Lanceros-Mendez

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 5· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) films incorporating 40 wt % of different types of imidazolium ionic liquids (ILs) comprising different magnetic anions (tetrachloroferrate [FeCl4]−, tetrathiocyanatocobaltate [Co(SCN)4]2–, and tetrachlorocobaltate [CoCl4]2−) and imidazolium cation chain lengths (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium) have been developed for humidity-sensing applications. The influence of the different ILs on the morphology of the IL/PVDF-HFP composites has been evaluated, with a porous structure observed independently of the IL anion type and cation chain length. The inclusion of the ILs into PVDF-HFP induces polymer crystallization into the electroactive β phase, with the increase more noticeable for PVDF-HFP/[Bmim][FeCl4], which reaches a β phase content of 85%. The degree of crystallinity slightly decreases with the incorporation of the filler and the incorporation of [Bmim]2[CoCl4], [Bmim]2[Co(SCN)4], and [Emim]2[Co(SCN)4], leading to a degree of crystallinity between 11 and 13%. A decrease in the thermal stability and yield strength is observed in the hybrid samples with respect to neat PVDF-HFP, with this decrease being more noticeable for the PVDF-HFP/[Bmim]2[Co(SCN)4] samples. Further, the highest magnetization has been obtained for the PVDF-HFP/[Bmim]2[Co(SCN)4] and PVDF-HFP/[Bmim][FeCl4] composites with similar filler concentrations. The suitability of the developed materials for humidity sensing has been evaluated by analyzing the impedance variation with varying relative humidity from 30 to 85%. [Bmim]2[CoCl4]/PVDF-HFP displays the highest relative humidity (RH) sensing response of −2245 ± 240 Ω/RH. Finally, the applicability of the developed hybrid IL/polymer composites has been demonstrated by the development of a real-time breathing monitoring device.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physics Centre of Minho and Porto Universities (CF-UM-UP), University of Minho, 4710-057Braga, Portugal

BCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, UPV/EHU Science Park, 48940Leioa, Spain

Centro ALGORITMI, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058Guimarães, Portugal

Department of Organic and Inorganic Chemistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940Leioa, Spain

Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, 48009Bilbao, Spain

Laboratory of Physics for Materials and Emergent Technologies, LapMET, University of Minho, 4710-057Braga, Portugal

Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, 4710-053Braga, Portugal

Centre of Chemistry, University of Minho, 4710-053Braga, Portugal

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigaci?n · European Regional Development Fund · Eusko Jaurlaritza · Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.21384610.1016/j.ccr.2021.213846 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.05.00110.1016/j.aiepr.2021.05.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.smaim.2020.07.00110.1016/j.smaim.2020.07.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.10.00710.1016/j.mattod.2019.10.007 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.scp.2021.10041110.1016/j.scp.2021.100411 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.01210.1016/j.addma.2018.03.012 ↗
7. 10.1108/AA-10-2013-09410.1108/AA-10-2013-094 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.11059110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110591 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.smaim.2020.07.00510.1016/j.smaim.2020.07.005 ↗
10. Zarras P. · 2014 · 32810.1533/9780857096883.2.328 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11104710.1016/j.msec.2020.111047 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sna.2019.11156510.1016/j.sna.2019.111565 ↗
13. Guyomar, D.; Cottinet, P.J.; Lallart, M. In Energy Harvesting in Electroactive Materials: A Comparison between Ferroelectrics and Electrostrictive Polymers, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems; SPIE, 2011; p 79841L.10.1117/12.880762 ↗
14. 10.1039/C1CS15092H10.1039/C1CS15092H ↗
15. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.03.08010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.03.080 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1381-5148(03)00055-510.1016/S1381-5148(03)00055-5 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11696-019-00982-910.1007/s11696-019-00982-9 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10853-021-06260-y10.1007/s10853-021-06260-y ↗
20. Costa C. M. S. · 2020 · 1
21. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0067510.1021/acsapm.9b00675 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.00610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e0010410.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00104 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20190973610.1002/adfm.201909736 ↗
25. 10.1007/s12551-018-0419-210.1007/s12551-018-0419-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11499410.1016/j.molliq.2020.114994 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12356410.1016/j.polymer.2021.123564 ↗
28. 10.1039/C8NR03259A10.1039/C8NR03259A ↗
29. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.02.08610.1016/j.molliq.2016.02.086 ↗
30. 10.1021/ac504260t10.1021/ac504260t ↗
31. 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.08.00710.1016/j.chroma.2016.08.007 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.08.01310.1016/j.chroma.2018.08.013 ↗
33. 10.1007/s12274-020-3172-310.1007/s12274-020-3172-3 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.13113610.1016/j.snb.2021.131136 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12363510.1016/j.polymer.2021.123635 ↗
36. 10.1088/1361-665x/abcca110.1088/1361-665x/abcca1 ↗
37. 10.1039/C8NR03259A10.1039/C8NR03259A ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.9b0064510.1021/acsami.9b00645 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10092810.1016/j.apmt.2020.100928 ↗
40. 10.1038/nprot.2017.15710.1038/nprot.2017.157 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10876910.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108769 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2011.11.00510.1016/j.vibspec.2011.11.005 ↗
43. 10.1002/polb.1994.09032050910.1002/polb.1994.090320509 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.01810.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.018 ↗
45. 10.3390/polym1202036110.3390/polym12020361 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e0017610.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00176 ↗
47. 10.1366/00037020778329200010.1366/000370207783292000 ↗
48. 10.1039/c2cp23920e10.1039/c2cp23920e ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0086810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00868 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12399510.1016/j.polymer.2021.123995 ↗
51. 10.1002/chem.20130360210.1002/chem.201303602 ↗
52. 10.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.10221110.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.102211 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.06010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.060 ↗
54. 10.1016/S0167-2738(96)00614-510.1016/S0167-2738(96)00614-5 ↗
55. Cameron, G. G. Polymer Electrolyte Reviews; MacCallum, J. R.; Vincent, C. A., Eds. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers: London, 1987; Vol. 20, pp 299–300.10.1002/pi.4980200325 ↗
56. 10.1002/elan.20140053010.1002/elan.201400530 ↗