journal article·2021-05-14

Process-Induced Microstructure in Viscose and Lyocell Regenerated Cellulose Fibers Revealed by SAXS and SEM of Acid-Etched Samples

Aakash Sharma, Parnashri Wankhede, Roopali Samant, Shailesh Nagarkar, Shirish Thakre, Guruswamy Kumaraswamy

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 3· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Regenerated cellulose fibers represent an important class of bioderived commercial fibers. The traditional viscose process requires the use of environmentally harmful carbon disulfide solvent to produce fibers. Lyocell fibers, produced using a more sustainable recent process, exhibit differences in properties from viscose. These differences arise from their semicrystalline microstructure, formed during fiber spinning. It is widely believed that regenerated cellulose fibers predominantly form fringed fibrillar crystals. We optimize acid etching, followed by SEM as an experimental tool to visualize this fibrillar structure. Acid etching provides sufficient topological contrast to directly visualize ∼O(10 nm) fibrils using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We combine SEM with small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to reveal other microstructural details. We observe a Bragg peak, indicating the coexistence of stacked lamellar structure with crystalline fibrils for viscose fibers, but not for lyocell. Viscose and lyocell fibers are characterized by partially oriented semicrystalline microstructure. We present a methodology to calculate the Lorentz correction for such microstructure and employ this to analyze the lamellar scattering from viscose fibers using a 1D correlation function approach. We characterize the lamellar microstructure after swelling viscose fibers with water and observe expansion of the Bragg spacing due to water absorption in the amorphous regions. Our data suggest that the water-induced plasticization of amorphous regions is inhomogeneous. Lamellar stacks that are more misoriented from the fiber direction exhibit lower swelling than those along the fiber direction. The experimental methods described in this work reveal interesting details of semicrystalline microstructure in regenerated cellulose fibers, with important implications for the mechanical response of dry and wet fibers. The methods developed here might find use in investigations of other polymer fibers as well.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India

Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India

Jülich Centre for Neutron Science (JCNS), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany

Chemical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India

Design for Manufacturability (DFM), Globalfoundries Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Manyata Embassy Business Park, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560045, India

Fiber and Textiles, Aditya Birla Science and Technology Company Pvt. Ltd., Plot no. 1 and 1A/1 MIDC Taloja, District Raigad, Taluka Panvel 410208, Maharashtra, India

Funding

Aditya Birla Science and Technology Company Pvt. Ltd.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1533/978185573758710.1533/9781855737587 ↗
2. Zhang S. · BioResources · 2018 · 13 · 457710.15376/biores.13.2.Zhang ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0065739010.1007/BF00657390 ↗
4. 10.1515/hfsg.1994.48.s1.7210.1515/hfsg.1994.48.s1.72 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.022 ↗
6. Röder T. · Lenzinger Berichte · 2013 · 91 · 7
7. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0048710.1021/acs.macromol.9b00487 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10570-019-02863-610.1007/s10570-019-02863-6 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10570-019-02352-w10.1007/s10570-019-02352-w ↗
10. Schuster K. C. · Lenzinger Berichte · 2003 · 82 · 107
11. Rous M. A. · Lenzinger Berichte · 2004 · 83 · 92
12. Abu-Rous M. · Lenzinger Berichte · 2006 · 85 · 31
13. 10.1177/00405175450150120110.1177/004051754501501201 ↗
14. 10.1177/00405175590290080710.1177/004051755902900807 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00433-410.1016/S0032-3861(99)00433-4 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.2672210.1002/app.26722 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-006-9052-510.1007/s10570-006-9052-5 ↗
18. 10.1021/bm061186i10.1021/bm061186i ↗
19. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00331-610.1016/S0032-3861(99)00331-6 ↗
20. 10.1002/apmc.1995.05229011210.1002/apmc.1995.052290112 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10570-012-9716-210.1007/s10570-012-9716-2 ↗
22. 10.1002/polc.507028011310.1002/polc.5070280113 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.06260110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.062601 ↗
24. Nemec H. · Lenzinger Berichte · 1994 · 9 · 69
25. 10.1007/s10570-004-2787-y10.1007/s10570-004-2787-y ↗
26. 10.1007/s10570-004-2786-z10.1007/s10570-004-2786-z ↗
27. 10.1002/pol.1958.120281172210.1002/pol.1958.1202811722 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.1963.07007040310.1002/app.1963.070070403 ↗
29. 10.1533/9781845697310.2.20110.1533/9781845697310.2.201 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00025-910.1016/S0079-6700(01)00025-9 ↗
31. 10.1021/ma60046a03710.1021/ma60046a037 ↗
32. 10.1002/app.1985.07030091810.1002/app.1985.070300918 ↗
33. 10.2115/fiber.56.40210.2115/fiber.56.402 ↗
34. 10.1021/ma60061a03910.1021/ma60061a039 ↗
35. 10.1002/pol.1956.120221020410.1002/pol.1956.1202210204 ↗
36. 10.1021/bm025772x10.1021/bm025772x ↗
37. 10.1002/actp.1992.01043060310.1002/actp.1992.010430603 ↗
38. 10.1002/pol.1973.18011060110.1002/pol.1973.180110601 ↗
39. 10.1016/0032-3861(82)90110-010.1016/0032-3861(82)90110-0 ↗
40. 10.1002/pol.1979.18017040610.1002/pol.1979.180170406 ↗
41. 10.1055/s-1996-426010.1055/s-1996-4260 ↗
42. 10.1021/ma00022a01310.1021/ma00022a013 ↗
43. Alexander L. E. · 1969
44. Klug H. P. · 1974
45. Stribeck N. · 2007
46. 10.1021/ma991150110.1021/ma9911501 ↗
47. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12<2527::AID-APP27>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12<2527::AID-APP27>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
48. 10.1021/ma991298k10.1021/ma991298k ↗
49. 10.1002/pol.1958.120281172210.1002/pol.1958.1202811722 ↗
50. 10.1002/app.1963.07007040110.1002/app.1963.070070401 ↗
51. Klemm D. · 1998
52. Northolt M. G. · Lenzinger Berichte · 1985 · 59 · 71
53. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12351010.1016/j.polymer.2021.123510 ↗
54. 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2005.tb00160.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.2005.tb00160.x ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0347010.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03470 ↗
56. 10.1021/ma300442310.1021/ma3004423 ↗