journal article·2019-08-09Open access

Interfacial Stereocomplexation To Strengthen Fused Deposition Modeled Poly(lactide) Welds

Varun Srinivas, Catharina S. J. van Hooy-Corstjens, Gavin B. M. Vaughan, Bas van Leeuwen, Sanjay Rastogi, Jules A. W. Harings

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 1· Issue 8

Abstract

The interlayer stiffness of fused deposition modeled (FDM) parts is significantly impaired by the slow diffusion and re-entangling of polymer chains across filament interfacial welds in the build direction. To mechanically reinforce FDM interfaces, an approach based on timing and spatial direction of stereocomplexation across weld interfaces is introduced via alternating deposition of enantiomerically opposite poly(lactides). Fundamental insight into the kinetics and spatial distribution of homo- and stereocrystallization at FDM interfaces was successfully reconstructed in 2 and 3 dimensions by micrometer resolved Fourier transform infrared microscopy and synchrotron wide-angle X-ray diffraction tomography. The rate of isothermal stereocomplexation and consequential interfacial stiffening increases with decreased absolute and relative molar masses. The spatial distribution of stereocrystals is governed by the relative molar masses and the extent of interdiffusion, under not only isothermal but also nonisothermal FDM conditions. The net local heat dosage, which depends on print speed, governs the length scales of stereocomplexation and thus mechanical reinforcement. Interfacial stereocomplexation of poly(lactides) in FDM leads to a distinct 40% increase in stiffness and nucleation of bulk filaments, aiding in thermodynamic and geometrical stability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Aachen-Maastricht Institute for Biobased Materials, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands

Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 550, 6400 AN Heerlen, The Netherlands

European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, CS40220, 38043 Grenoble, France

Corbion Purac Biomaterials, P.O. Box 21, 4200 AA Gorinchem, The Netherlands

Funding

Province of Limburg · Stichting Innovatie Alliantie

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
2. 10.1002/mame.20080012110.1002/mame.200800121 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.009 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12541-009-0106-010.1007/s12541-009-0106-0 ↗
5. 10.1038/nchem.25810.1038/nchem.258 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034 ↗
7. 10.3139/9783446431621.fm10.3139/9783446431621.fm ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.02910.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.029 ↗
9. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.07810.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.078 ↗
11. 10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-013510.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135 ↗
12. 10.1108/1355254961073203410.1108/13552549610732034 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-4 ↗
15. 10.1126/sciadv.170026210.1126/sciadv.1700262 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.06310.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.063 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.05710.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.057 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.03110.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.031 ↗
19. 10.1122/1.290123110.1122/1.2901231 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00170-016-8914-810.1007/s00170-016-8914-8 ↗
21. Alsoufi M. · Int. J. Mech. Mechatronics Eng. · 2017 · 17 · 7
22. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00425-510.1016/S0032-3861(99)00425-5 ↗
23. 10.3390/jcs201000710.3390/jcs2010007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.07410.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.074 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.05410.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.054 ↗
26. 10.1021/ma070082c10.1021/ma070082c ↗
27. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00004-X10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00004-X ↗
28. 10.1002/mabi.20050006210.1002/mabi.200500062 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.01710.1016/j.addr.2016.04.017 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.1994.07051021610.1002/app.1994.070510216 ↗
31. 10.1021/sc500464c10.1021/sc500464c ↗
32. 10.1002/mame.20100039710.1002/mame.201000397 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.12310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.123 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.4107310.1002/app.41073 ↗
35. 10.1107/S160057751800060710.1107/S1600577518000607 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.07.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.07.005 ↗
37. 10.1002/pen.76022040210.1002/pen.760220402 ↗
38. Piorkowska E. · 201310.1002/9781118541838 ↗
39. 10.1021/ma00244a01610.1021/ma00244a016 ↗
40. 10.1021/ma402653a10.1021/ma402653a ↗
41. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.01810.1016/j.addma.2018.10.018 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.05110.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.051 ↗
43. 10.1021/ma201906a10.1021/ma201906a ↗
44. 10.1021/ma070607110.1021/ma0706071 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.01010.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.010 ↗