journal article·2024-01-12

Grafting of Polymer Brushes on MOF Surface to Achieve Proton-Conducting Membranes

Nilanjan Mukherjee, Anupam Das, Subhabrata Mukhopadhyay, Samar K. Das, Tushar Jana

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 6· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In recent years, postsynthetic modification (PSM) of a metal–organic framework (MOF) has gained immense interest for the synthesis of hybrid materials with improved functionality. However, further improvement in the PSM strategies to make them scalable and yield a synthetically tunable MOF surface can create polymer chain-grafted MOF hybrid materials in which polymer chains provide the stability, robustness, and desired functional performances and MOF offers interesting physical properties. Toward these goals, in this work we have developed a simple and effective method to functionalize the UiO-66-NH 2 MOF surface by grafting functional polymer brushes using surface-initiated reversible addition–fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization. At first, the MOF surface was transformed into a polymerizable surface by attaching a trithiocarbonate-based chain-transfer agent (CTA) and then, three different sets of polymer brushes consisting of (i) a neutral but basic nitrogen functionality (PGM-N), (ii) a trimethyl-substituted quaternary ammonium functionality (PGM-C), and (iii) a quaternary ammonium along with sulfonate functionality (PGM-Z) were grown on the activated MOF surface. The uniqueness of this work has additionally been enhanced by utilizing these synthesized PGMs as nanofillers into the oxypolybenzimidazole (OPBI) membrane matrix to obtain homogeneous mixed matrix membranes (OPBI@PGM) that show brilliant thermomechanical and tensile properties and exceptional thermal stability. Interestingly, these membranes exhibit superior proton conductivity when doped with H 3 PO 4 (PA) and minimal acid leaching. Grafting of functional polymer brushes on the MOF surface induces strong H-bonding and acid–base interactions with OPBI chains and H 3 PO 4 molecules, which are responsible for such high acid uptake and excellent acid retention, thereby displaying a proton conductivity as high as 0.241 S cm –1 at 160 °C (∼4-fold increase when compared to OPBI), which is among the highest values reported till date for an MOF-based proton exchange membrane with excellent mechanical vigor.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500046, India

Funding

University Grants Commission · Science and Engineering Research Board · University of Hyderabad · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr300014x10.1021/cr300014x ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20170430310.1002/adma.201704303 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.0c2155410.1021/acsami.0c21554 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0011910.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00119 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0306010.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03060 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0047110.1021/acsaem.2c00471 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0154010.1021/acsenergylett.8b01540 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.9b1801810.1021/acsami.9b18018 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.3c0217110.1021/acsami.3c02171 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.7b1652210.1021/acsami.7b16522 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.1c0108910.1021/acsami.1c01089 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0097810.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00978 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.2c0050010.1021/acsami.2c00500 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0297210.1021/acsaem.2c02972 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.9b0112110.1021/acsami.9b01121 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0132210.1021/acsaem.0c01322 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c0059710.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00597 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0939610.1021/acsnano.2c09396 ↗
19. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0069010.1021/acscentsci.0c00690 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.1c0718810.1021/acsami.1c07188 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0482010.1021/acs.iecr.9b04820 ↗
22. 10.1002/smtd.20220141310.1002/smtd.202201413 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.9b0750010.1021/acsami.9b07500 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12374210.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123742 ↗
25. 10.1039/D2GC00208F10.1039/D2GC00208F ↗
26. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0015610.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00156 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.9b0262210.1021/acsami.9b02622 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12831210.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128312 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.02.00510.1016/j.chempr.2017.02.005 ↗
30. Divya K. · 2020 · 3710.1016/B978-0-12-819158-3.00003-3 ↗
31. Rana D. · 2008 · 1
32. Muthumeenal A. · 2018 · 2018 · 35110.1201/9781315105666-17 ↗
33. 10.1039/c3cc46105j10.1039/c3cc46105j ↗
34. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0460310.1021/acsanm.2c04603 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0083410.1021/acsanm.3c00834 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12431510.1016/j.polymer.2021.124315 ↗
37. 10.1039/D0SC03318A10.1039/D0SC03318A ↗
38. 10.1039/C5CC02339D10.1039/C5CC02339D ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.7b0627410.1021/acsami.7b06274 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0050010.1021/acsapm.2c00500 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.04.00610.1016/j.polymer.2014.04.006 ↗
42. 10.1038/s42004-020-00361-610.1038/s42004-020-00361-6 ↗
43. 10.1021/jacs.0c0877310.1021/jacs.0c08773 ↗
44. 10.3390/nano1311174210.3390/nano13111742 ↗
45. 10.1039/C6RA25959F10.1039/C6RA25959F ↗
46. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980919)69:12<2441::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-#10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980919)69:12<2441::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
47. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991031)74:5<1169::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991031)74:5<1169::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
48. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000624)76:13<1950::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000624)76:13<1950::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00066-510.1016/S0032-3861(00)00066-5 ↗