journal article·2023-12-08Open access

Shear Piezoelectricity of Poly(l-lactide) Films Manufactured by Extrusion–Orientation: An Insight on Process–Structure–Property Relationships

Mohamed Aymen Ben Achour, Sophie Barrau, Jean-François Tahon, Mohamed Rguiti, Christian Courtois, Birgit Stubbe, Jean-Marie Raquez, Marie-France Lacrampe, Cédric Samuel

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 5· Issue 12

Abstract

Shear piezoelectric properties of uniaxially stretched poly( l -lactide) (US-PLA) films manufactured by an industrially relevant technique (i.e., extrusion–orientation without poling) are investigated, and specific insight on the process–structure–properties relationships is provided. Two commercially available PLA grades with d -isomer content between 2 and 4% are selected. The shear piezoelectric coefficient d 14 of US-PLA films tends to increase with the draw ratio applied during the orientation stage, and a maximal d 14 of 5.9 pC/N is reported. However, a dramatic degradation of piezoelectric properties could be observed at elevated draw ratios, in particular for PLA grades with low d -isomer content. Structures induced by the orientation stage are subsequently explored, and relations with shear piezoelectric properties are discussed. The mesophase is detected by DSC/WAXS up to draw ratio 4 after being replaced by strain-induced crystallization at higher draw ratios. The orientation state of the amorphous phase, mesophase, and α′-crystals is assessed by 2D-WAXS and polarized FTIR. Piezoelectric properties obtained at a moderate draw ratio are supported by the amount/orientation of each phase (partly oriented amorphous phase and fully oriented mesophase/α′-crystal phase). A model is proposed to evaluate the contribution of each phase. However, other structural parameters deserve careful attention at elevated draw ratios, in particular mechanical damage and formation of voids/cavities. 2D-SAXS analysis coupled with complementary characterizations indicates that the amount of voids/cavities controls the deterioration of shear piezoelectric performances at high draw ratios. This phenomenon is critical for highly crystalline PLA grades. A final discussion is dedicated to the quality of α′-crystals formed by current orientation conditions, a factor that could also limit the d 14 coefficient of US-PLA films. This work consequently demonstrates that environmentally friendly piezoelectric films could be manufactured by a straightforward process of the plastic industry and opens up several scientific/technological perspectives for their future implementation into practical applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, INSA Hauts-de-France, Laboratoire de Matériaux Céramiques et de Mathématiques (CERAMATHS), F-59313 Valenciennes, France

Université de Lille, CNRS, INRAE, Centrale Lille, UMR 8207, Unité Matériaux et Transformations (UMET), F-59000 Lille, France

Centexbel, Technologiepark 70, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium

University of Mons, Laboratory of Polymeric and Composite Materials (LPCM), Center of Innovation and Research in Materials and Polymers (CIRMAP), Place du Parc 20, B-7000 Mons, Belgium

IMT Nord Europe, Institut Mines-Télécom, Université de Lille, Centre for Materials and Processes, F-59000 Lille, France

Funding

Interreg · Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen · Service Public de Wallonie · Institut Chevreul · Interreg Vlaanderen-Nederland · R?gion Hauts-de-France · International Campus on Safety and Intermodality in Transportation · Minist?re de l?Enseignement Sup?rieur, de la Recherche et de l?Innovation

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1201/978148229545010.1201/9781482295450 ↗
2. 10.1080/0015019820821059310.1080/00150198208210593 ↗
3. 10.1121/1.38722510.1121/1.387225 ↗
4. 10.1016/0041-624X(76)90067-610.1016/0041-624X(76)90067-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.00610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.006 ↗
6. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/6/06501010.1088/0964-1726/19/6/065010 ↗
7. 10.1039/C8SM00268A10.1039/C8SM00268A ↗
8. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0035110.1021/acsapm.0c00351 ↗
9. 10.1002/app.4324810.1002/app.43248 ↗
10. 10.1002/mame.20180046310.1002/mame.201800463 ↗
11. 10.1002/adem.20210131210.1002/adem.202101312 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/3/03300110.1088/0964-1726/23/3/033001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.01110.1016/j.joule.2018.03.011 ↗
14. 10.1039/C6TA09590A10.1039/C6TA09590A ↗
15. 10.1002/admt.20190071610.1002/admt.201900716 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20200220810.1002/adma.202002208 ↗
17. 10.1002/advs.20210086410.1002/advs.202100864 ↗
18. 10.3390/s2013373010.3390/s20133730 ↗
19. 10.3390/jfb1204007110.3390/jfb12040071 ↗
20. 10.1016/0006-355X(95)00039-C10.1016/0006-355X(95)00039-C ↗
21. 10.1143/JJAP.37.337410.1143/JJAP.37.3374 ↗
22. 10.1002/polb.2234510.1002/polb.22345 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12509510.1016/j.polymer.2022.125095 ↗
24. 10.3390/proceedings104033510.3390/proceedings1040335 ↗
25. 10.1002/adsu.20170006810.1002/adsu.201700068 ↗
26. 10.1002/adsu.20200019210.1002/adsu.202000192 ↗
27. 10.7567/JJAP.52.09KD1710.7567/JJAP.52.09KD17 ↗
28. 10.1143/JJAP.48.09KE0610.1143/JJAP.48.09KE06 ↗
29. 10.1143/JJAP.51.09LD1610.1143/JJAP.51.09LD16 ↗
30. 10.7567/JJAP.52.09KE0210.7567/JJAP.52.09KE02 ↗
31. 10.7567/JJAP.55.04EA0710.7567/JJAP.55.04EA07 ↗
32. 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.274410.1109/TUFFC.2013.2744 ↗
33. 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.74610.1109/TUFFC.2008.746 ↗
34. 10.1080/00150193.2015.101241010.1080/00150193.2015.1012410 ↗
35. 10.7567/JJAP.53.09PC0210.7567/JJAP.53.09PC02 ↗
36. 10.1143/JJAP.49.09MC1110.1143/JJAP.49.09MC11 ↗
37. 10.1109/TUFFC.2002.100934410.1109/TUFFC.2002.1009344 ↗
38. 10.1088/1361-665X/acd97210.1088/1361-665X/acd972 ↗
39. Newnham R. E. · 2005
40. 10.1002/pat.594210.1002/pat.5942 ↗
41. 10.1021/ma048794f10.1021/ma048794f ↗
42. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.00210.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.002 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.11.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.11.010 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.01210.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.012 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.01.03110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.01.031 ↗
46. 10.1021/ma902436610.1021/ma9024366 ↗
47. 10.1021/ma101430c10.1021/ma101430c ↗
48. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12382210.1016/j.polymer.2021.123822 ↗
49. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0828210.1021/acssuschemeng.1c08282 ↗
50. 10.1021/ma051232r10.1021/ma051232r ↗
51. 10.1021/ma800343g10.1021/ma800343g ↗
52. 10.3390/polym901001810.3390/polym9010018 ↗
53. 10.1016/B978-0-323-37100-1.00011-910.1016/B978-0-323-37100-1.00011-9 ↗
54. 10.1016/B978-0-323-22136-8.00004-110.1016/B978-0-323-22136-8.00004-1 ↗
55. 10.3390/polym1102030610.3390/polym11020306 ↗
56. 10.3390/polym1202046310.3390/polym12020463 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.02110.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.021 ↗
58. 10.1021/am403443m10.1021/am403443m ↗
59. 10.1021/ma500846x10.1021/ma500846x ↗
60. 10.1021/ma061890r10.1021/ma061890r ↗
61. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.01010.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.010 ↗