Integration of a Hydrophilic Hyperbranched Polymer and a Quaternary Ammonium Compound to Mitigate Membrane Biofouling
Source abstract
Abstract
Membrane biofouling, adhesion of microorganisms on the surface and the subsequent formation of a biofilm, remains a persistent and inevitable issue, which results in a dramatic reduction of permeability and lifespan. Constructing a membrane with active bacteria-killing and passive anti-adhesion properties is still a challenge to mitigate membrane biofouling. Herein, an active–passive anti-biofouling membrane was originally fabricated by integration of hydrophilic hyperbranched poly(N-acryloylmorpholine) (HPA) and the dimethylaminoethyl acrylate–dodecylammonium bromide (DD) quaternary ammonium compound. Inspired by modern dopamine biomimetic adhesion chemistry, thiolated HPA was first immobilized on the polydopamine (PD)-modified poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane surface through Michael addition, followed by conjugation of DD via a thiol–ene click reaction. The membrane surface changes of the chemical structure, hydrophilicity, and zeta potential proved that bacteria-killing DD and the anti-adhesion HPA layer were successively conjugated. The initial contact angle of the M-PD/HPA/DD membrane was reduced from 120.5° for the pure membrane to 52.3°. Furthermore, the water flux of the M-PD/HPA/DD membrane increased from 318.9 L m–2 h–1 (0.02 MPa) for the pure membrane to 854.4 L m–2 h–1. In addition, the M-PD/HPA/DD membrane exhibited excellent active bacteria-killing property with inhibition rates of ∼90% for Escherichia coli and ∼95% for Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. Meanwhile, in the filtration of artificial bacteria wastewater, the M-PD/HPA/DD membrane showed a higher water flux recovery rate of 86.9% than 43.3% for the pure membrane, indicating an excellent anti-biofouling property. Therefore, this molecular-level design approach for the modification of the membrane surface could significantly enhance permeability and mitigate membrane biofouling, which provides a promising dimension for the preparation of the anti-biofouling membrane.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes/National Center for International Joint Research on Separation Membranes, School of Material Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fluorine Chemistry and Chemical Materials/Shandong Engineering Research Center for Fluorinated Material, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
Funding
Tianjin Education Scientific Research Projects
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0659910.1038/nature06599 ↗
2. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1810.1038/natrevmats.2016.18 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11786510.1016/j.memsci.2020.117865 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.06.03710.1016/j.jcis.2020.06.037 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.01710.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.017 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0077910.1021/acsapm.1c00779 ↗
7. 10.1039/b926440j10.1039/b926440j ↗
8. 10.1007/s00253-010-2463-010.1007/s00253-010-2463-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.08910.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.089 ↗
10. 10.1039/c8ew00206a10.1039/c8ew00206a ↗
11. 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.00410.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.004 ↗
12. 10.1081/ss-20006840910.1081/ss-200068409 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0012510.1021/acsapm.1c00125 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.04010.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.040 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0065410.1021/acsapm.1c00654 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12097610.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120976 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.07010.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.070 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.00410.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.01.03910.1016/j.memsci.2018.01.039 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.04810.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.048 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.02910.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.029 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20100121510.1002/adma.201001215 ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20080357010.1002/anie.200803570 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.04610.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.046 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.03.01810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.03.018 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.12.01410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.12.014 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.10473510.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104735 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.05510.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.055 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.04210.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.042 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11865810.1016/j.memsci.2020.118658 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.5b0664710.1021/acsami.5b06647 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.03.01110.1016/j.cherd.2020.03.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.00110.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.001 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.21710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.217 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20170532710.1002/adfm.201705327 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12401910.1016/j.cej.2020.124019 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20190750510.1002/adma.201907505 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.00210.1016/j.matt.2019.05.002 ↗
41. 10.1039/c9py00510b10.1039/c9py00510b ↗
42. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11767310.1016/j.memsci.2019.117673 ↗
43. 10.1039/c2tb00273f10.1039/c2tb00273f ↗
44. 10.1002/app.4154910.1002/app.41549 ↗
45. 10.1039/c7mh00488e10.1039/c7mh00488e ↗
46. 10.1080/09205063.2016.120749110.1080/09205063.2016.1207491 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.10988310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109883 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11777310.1016/j.memsci.2019.117773 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0323110.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03231 ↗
50. 10.1002/anie.20160150910.1002/anie.201601509 ↗
51. 10.1039/c2jm34825j10.1039/c2jm34825j ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0090210.1021/acs.est.6b00902 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b0000810.1021/acs.estlett.5b00008 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.10410.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.104 ↗