journal article·2019-01-11Open access

Confined Ionic Liquid in an Ionic Porous Aromatic Framework for Gas Separation

Ziqi Tian, Sheng Dai, De-en Jiang

ACS Applied Polymer Materials· Volume 1· Issue 1

Abstract

Ionic liquids (ILs) and porous frameworks are commonly employed in gas separation, but rarely together. To leverage their combined advantages, we designed a novel system comprising an ionic liquid inside a charged porous-polymer framework. A positively charged ionic porous aromatic framework was impregnated with an ionic liquid to confine the cations and anions inside the polymeric framework via electrostatic interactions. Molecular dynamics and free energy simulations were performed to determine the solubility, diffusivity, and hence permeability of CO2 and CH4 through the composite material. We found that the polymeric framework introduces nanoscale space in the confined IL, improving gas solubility, while the IL promotes gas transport in the porous structure. The confinement impacts CO2 and CH4 very differently regarding their solubility and diffusivity. Through tuning of the ionic-liquid loading, both high CO2 permeability and high CO2/CH4 selectivity could be achieved, overcoming the Robeson upper bound. This work highlights the advantages of confined ionic liquids in an ionic porous-polymer framework in enhancing selective gas separation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology & Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1219 Zhongguan West Road, Zhenhai District, Ningbo 315201, P.R. China

Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ie010808810.1021/ie0108088 ↗
2. 10.1021/ie801903210.1021/ie8019032 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20170495310.1002/adma.201704953 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cherd.2015.03.00210.1016/j.cherd.2015.03.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.03010.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 ↗
6. 10.1039/C6NR08417F10.1039/C6NR08417F ↗
7. 10.1038/nnano.2017.7210.1038/nnano.2017.72 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.03610.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.036 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.03.01510.1016/j.cogsc.2017.03.015 ↗
10. 10.1039/C5CS00510H10.1039/C5CS00510H ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007210.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00072 ↗
12. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.7810.1038/natrevmats.2016.78 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.00410.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.004 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0062610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20170518910.1002/adma.201705189 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.12.01010.1016/j.ccr.2015.12.010 ↗
17. 10.1080/15583724.2014.96323510.1080/15583724.2014.963235 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4MH00163J10.1039/C4MH00163J ↗
19. 10.1039/C7EE01872J10.1039/C7EE01872J ↗
20. 10.1039/C7EE00830A10.1039/C7EE00830A ↗
21. 10.1038/nmat411310.1038/nmat4113 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5CC06742A10.1039/C5CC06742A ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-017-00544-110.1038/s41467-017-00544-1 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.125422710.1126/science.1254227 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20170395910.1002/anie.201703959 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0512110.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05121 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0050910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00509 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0001910.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00019 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp208361p10.1021/jp208361p ↗
30. 10.1039/c2cp23972h10.1039/c2cp23972h ↗
31. 10.1021/la400226g10.1021/la400226g ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0794310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07943 ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.20150550810.1002/anie.201505508 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.6b1108710.1021/acsami.6b11087 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0084810.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00848 ↗
36. 10.1039/C6TA02611G10.1039/C6TA02611G ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0412310.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04123 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.8b0580210.1021/jacs.8b05802 ↗
39. 10.1021/ma300278d10.1021/ma300278d ↗
40. 10.1039/C4TA02022G10.1039/C4TA02022G ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20150336210.1002/anie.201503362 ↗
42. 10.1039/C6CS00597G10.1039/C6CS00597G ↗
43. 10.1038/nchem.277110.1038/nchem.2771 ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20090463710.1002/anie.200904637 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
48. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
49. Padua, A. FFtool. https://github.com/agiliopadua/fftool (accessed Oct 15, 2017).
50. 10.1021/j100031a03410.1021/j100031a034 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.188410810.1063/1.1884108 ↗
52. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
53. 10.1039/C3CP54326A10.1039/C3CP54326A ↗
54. 10.1021/ie501501k10.1021/ie501501k ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.jced.5b0099010.1021/acs.jced.5b00990 ↗
56. 10.1021/jacs.5b0626610.1021/jacs.5b06266 ↗
57. 10.1002/cssc.20170071610.1002/cssc.201700716 ↗