Preparation of Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose–Chitosan Complex Membranes through Sustainable Aqueous Phase Separation
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The aqueous phase separation (APS) technique has recently been introduced as one of the more sustainable methods to produce polymeric membranes. So far, almost all the APS membranes are produced on the basis of synthetic polyelectrolytes that are typically obtained from petroleum sources. In this work, we utilized natural polyelectrolytes to produce even more sustainable membranes via APS. Two natural polyelectrolytes, polyanionic sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and polycationic chitosan (CS), were used to fabricate the polyelectrolyte complex membranes. By changing the solution pH and monomer ratio of polyelectrolytes, a desired homogeneous casting solution was prepared at pH ∼1 where CMC was uncharged. Exposing this solution to an acetate buffer coagulation bath at pH ∼5 caused CMC to acquire negative charges, leading to the formation of a polyelectrolyte complex with the positively charged CS. The structure and properties of the resultant membranes could be tuned by changing the concentration and pH of the acetate buffer. All the membranes showed an asymmetric structure with a dense top layer and porous inner structure. The membranes possessed tunable pure water permeability and were able to effectively (∼99%) remove oil droplets from an oil-in-water emulsion. This work demonstrates that natural polyelectrolytes can indeed be used to produce more sustainable APS membranes that can be directly applied for water treatment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Molecules & Materials, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands
Faculty of Science and Technology, Membrane Science and Technology, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands
Funding
China Scholarship Council
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c5ew00159e10.1039/c5ew00159e ↗
2. Baker, R. W. Membrane Technology and Applications; John Wiley & Sons, 2012, pp 1–575.
3. Nunes, S. P.; Peinemann, K.V. Membrane Technology: In the Chemical Industry; John Wiley & Sons, 2006, pp 1–340.10.1002/3527608788.ch1 ↗
4. 10.1021/ie101928r10.1021/ie101928r ↗
5. 10.1039/c4gc00613e10.1039/c4gc00613e ↗
6. 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.00810.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.008 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0100610.1021/acsapm.9b01006 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0025510.1021/acsapm.0c00255 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11911410.1016/j.memsci.2021.119114 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11863210.1016/j.memsci.2020.118632 ↗
11. 10.1002/adem.20200140110.1002/adem.202001401 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.9b0211510.1021/acsami.9b02115 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20190734410.1002/adfm.201907344 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11850210.1016/j.memsci.2020.118502 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.11001510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110015 ↗
16. 10.1179/174328408x34176210.1179/174328408x341762 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.09310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.093 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.01410.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.014 ↗
19. 10.1021/bm034345w10.1021/bm034345w ↗
20. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0200310.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.07910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.079 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0364810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03648 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.030 ↗
24. 10.1002/pat.501010.1002/pat.5010 ↗
25. 10.1007/s13762-017-1554-110.1007/s13762-017-1554-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.10042910.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100429 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.07.03310.1016/j.apsusc.2011.07.033 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.2813310.1002/app.28133 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12025610.1016/j.memsci.2022.120256 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10856-009-3720-610.1007/s10856-009-3720-6 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b0037110.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00371 ↗
32. 10.1002/app.2155210.1002/app.21552 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.02.00110.1016/j.memsci.2009.02.001 ↗
34. 10.1177/088391150708132910.1177/0883911507081329 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10570-022-04753-w10.1007/s10570-022-04753-w ↗
36. 10.1039/c8sm00476e10.1039/c8sm00476e ↗
37. 10.1007/s10924-012-0458-x10.1007/s10924-012-0458-x ↗
38. 10.5539/jfr.v3n2p7110.5539/jfr.v3n2p71 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.12810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.128 ↗
40. 10.1039/f1986820235310.1039/f19868202353 ↗
41. 10.1016/s0011-9164(00)82092-510.1016/s0011-9164(00)82092-5 ↗
42. 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00281-210.1016/0376-7388(95)00281-2 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.01310.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.013 ↗
44. 10.1002/tcr.20210032010.1002/tcr.202100320 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.04510.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.045 ↗
46. 10.3390/membranes1102008010.3390/membranes11020080 ↗
47. Charcosset, C. Membrane Processes in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutics; Elsevier, 2012, pp 1–336.10.1016/B978-0-444-56334-7.00001-0 ↗
48. 10.1039/d1gc01998h10.1039/d1gc01998h ↗