Transparent Polyisocyanurate-Polyurethane-Based Aerogels: Key Aspects on the Synthesis and Their Porous Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of the catalyst concentration on the synthesis and textural properties of polyisocyanurate-polyurethane aerogels is analyzed. The use of different catalyst amounts allows obtaining low-density aerogels (0.10–0.16 g/cm3) with high porosities (85–91%). Their porous structures were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm. A noticeable decrease in the size of the scattering centers, particles and pores, was achieved when reducing the catalyst amount. In some samples, the small size of these features, much smaller than the wavelength of visible light, causes a bare light dispersion, leading to the first transparent polyisocyanurate-polyurethane aerogels. Light transmittance measurements at 532 nm have been made showing high values (ca. 76% for 1 mm thick samples) for the formulations with the smallest particle and pore sizes. These aerogels presenting optical transparency have many potential applications such as solar collectors, glazing systems for insulating windows, and sensors, among others.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cellular Materials Laboratory (CellMat), Condensed Matter Physics Department, Faculty of Science, University of Valladolid, Campus Miguel Delibes, Paseo de Belén 7, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci??n y Universidades · Junta de Castilla y Le??n · Ente P??blico Regional de la Energ??a de Castilla y Le??n
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cis.2016.05.01110.1016/j.cis.2016.05.011 ↗
2. 10.1155/2013/40606510.1155/2013/406065 ↗
3. 10.1533/9781845699277.2.31910.1533/9781845699277.2.319 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.culher.2019.09.00710.1016/j.culher.2019.09.007 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12051710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120517 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.7b1885610.1021/acsami.7b18856 ↗
7. 10.1080/0032391050040296110.1080/00323910500402961 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.10.01710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.10.017 ↗
9. 10.1016/0741-983X(87)90069-510.1016/0741-983X(87)90069-5 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.00610.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.006 ↗
11. 10.1557/mre.2020.4010.1557/mre.2020.40 ↗
12. Aegerter M. A. · 201110.1007/978-1-4419-7589-8 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80464-810.1016/S0022-3093(05)80464-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00028-310.1016/0022-3093(95)00028-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0038-092X(01)00086-X10.1016/S0038-092X(01)00086-X ↗
16. 10.1016/S0038-092X(98)00063-210.1016/S0038-092X(98)00063-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11058710.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110587 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.02710.1016/j.energy.2015.02.027 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.9b1779610.1021/acsami.9b17796 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20200122810.1002/adma.202001228 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.02910.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.029 ↗
22. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0107910.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01079 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20140512310.1002/anie.201405123 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0227510.1021/acsanm.9b02275 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11708910.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117089 ↗
26. 10.1093/ijlct/cts00110.1093/ijlct/cts001 ↗
27. Burgaz, E. Polyurethane Insulation Foams for Energy and Sustainability 2019, Vol. 111.10.1007/978-3-030-19558-8 ↗
28. Hickel R. · Presse Med. · 1955 · 63 · 619
29. 10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00103-310.1016/S0022-3093(98)00103-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00010-610.1016/S0022-3093(98)00010-6 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.06.04910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.06.049 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.supflu.2015.05.01210.1016/j.supflu.2015.05.012 ↗
33. 10.1021/cm401623h10.1021/cm401623h ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.7b0334410.1021/acsami.7b03344 ↗
35. 10.1093/ijlct/cts00110.1093/ijlct/cts001 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00004-510.1016/S0306-2619(99)00004-5 ↗
37. ASTM D1622-08: Standard Test Method for Apparent Density of Rigid Cellular Plastics.
38. 10.1021/ja01145a12610.1021/ja01145a126 ↗
39. 10.1177/0021955×1350384710.1177/0021955×13503847 ↗
40. 10.1039/p2995000039510.1039/p29950000395 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.9b1075510.1021/acsami.9b10755 ↗
42. 10.1177/0021955X0505511510.1177/0021955X05055115 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00481-610.1016/S0032-3861(03)00481-6 ↗
44. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A. V.; Olivier, J. P.; Rodriguez-reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. S. W. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report), 2015. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117.10.1515/iupac.87.0731 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00454-910.1016/S0022-3093(01)00454-9 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0361010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03610 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.10310.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.103 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00131-810.1016/S0022-3093(98)00131-8 ↗
49. 10.1039/d0na00655f10.1039/d0na00655f ↗
50. 10.1016/0022-3093(94)90206-210.1016/0022-3093(94)90206-2 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.01010.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.010 ↗